The Relation Between Social Learning and Visual Culture

Main Article Content

Meliha Yılmaz Uğur Yılmaz Ece Nur Demir Yılmaz



With the developing technology, acceleration of visual production and increasing of peoples’ relation with generated visuals (painting, photograph, video, computer games, poster, etc.), is a situation which affect perceptual and behavioral characteristic of people. As a result of connection with generated visuals, changes at the perception and behavior of people remind social learning and visual culture terms which have relation with seeing and visuality fields. Relation between the social learning theory, which states that learning occurs through observation in social environment, and visual culture subject is a mystery. Due to this reason, the research aims to investigate relation between social learning and visual culture. Theoretical structures of the social learning and visual culture terms were pointed out in this research, and relation between these two terms were argued at theoretic level. In consequence of this research, it was seen that experiences, people obtain from connection with visual culture forms in their daily life, and social learning have connections. It was realized that visual culture forms supply vicarious livings to the observers prone to observe and imitate of behaviors that have model characteristic. It was seen that the livings, acquired observational learning from visual culture forms, is a shaping factor for individuals’ attitudes and actions. In the study, it was seen that examining the visual culture as an environmental factor in the context of social learning will help to understand and illuminate the changing, transforming and deriving aspects of human behavior in the 21st century.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
YILMAZ, Meliha; YILMAZ, Uğur; DEMIR YILMAZ, Ece Nur. The Relation Between Social Learning and Visual Culture. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 421-427, mar. 2019. ISSN 1307-9298. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 19 sep. 2020.


Aristoteles. (2010). Politika (M. Tunçay, Trans.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21-41.
Barnard, M. (1998). Art, design and visual culture: An introduction. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Bayrakcı, M. (2007). Sosyal öğrenme kuramı ve eğitimde uygulanması. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 198–210. Retrieved from
Berger, J. (1977). Ways of seeing. New York, NY: Penguin.
Bigge, M. L. & Shermis, S. S. (2004). Learning theories for teachers (6th ed). Boston: Pearson.
Çakır, M. (2014). Görsel kültür ve küresel kitle kültürü. Ankara: Ütopya.
Dewey, J. (2004). Democracy and education an introduction to the philosophy of education. İndia: Aakar.
Dolu, O., Büker, H., & Uludağ, Ş. (2010). Şiddet içerikli video oyunlarının çocuklar ve gençler üzerindeki etkileri: saldırganlık, şiddet ve suça dair bir değerlendirme. Adli Bilimler Dergisi / Turkish Journal of Forensic Sciences, 9(4). 54-75. Retrieved fromŞiddet_İçerikli_Video_Oyunlarının_Çocuklar_ve_Gençler_Üzerindeki_Etkileri_Saldırganlık_Şiddet_ve_Suça_Dair_Bir_Değerlendirme
Duncum, P. (2001). Visual culture: Developments, definitions, and directions for art education. Studies in Art Education, 42(2), 101-112.
Duncum, P. (2002). Clarifying visual culture art education. Art Education, 55(3), 6-11.
Erjem, Y. & Çağlayandereli, M. (2006). Televı̇zyon ve gençlı̇k: yerlı̇ dı̇zı̇lerı̇n gençlerı̇n model alma davranışı üzerindeki etkisi̇. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (C.Ü.), 30(1), 15–30. Retrieved fromçlik,_yerli_diziler.._gençlik.._model_alma..,_m._ça-layandereli,_2006.pdf
Freedman, K. (2000). Social perspectives on art education in the U.S.: Teaching visual culture in a democracy. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 314-329.
Gredler, M. (2009). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Howells, R. & Negreiros, J. (2015). Visual culture (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Kalkan, M. (2011). Sosyal öğrenme kuramı. In Y. Özbay & S. Erkan (Eds.), Eğitim psikolojisi (pp. 245-270). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Leppert, R. (2009). Sanatta anlamın görüntüsü imgelerin toplumsal işlevi (İ. Türkmen, Trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
Miller, N. & Dollard, J. (1979). Social learning and imitation. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Mirzoeff, N. (2009). An introduction to visual culture (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Özbay, Y. (2011). Bilişsel gelişim. In Y. Özbay & S. Erkan (Eds.), Eğitim psikolojisi (pp. 131-148). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Senemoğlu, N. (2012). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Tavin, K. & Hausman, J. (2004). Art education and visual culture in the age of globalization. Art Education, 57(5), 47-53. doi:10.1080/00043125.2004.11653568
Tavin, K. M. (2005). Opening re-marks: Critical antecedents of visual culture in art education. Studies in Art Education, 47(1), 5-22. doi:10.1080/00393541.2005.11652810
Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: experimental studies. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between Learning and Development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Woolfolk, A. (2015). Eğitim psikolojisi (D. Özen, Trans.). İstanbul: Kaknüs.