Published
August 4, 2017
| Pages: 229-256 | Views: 248
References
Allen, W. (1983). Classroom management: students’ perspectives, goals, and strategies.
American educational research journal, 23(3), p. 437-459.
Becker, H. S. (1961). Boys in white: student culture in medical school. New Brunswick:
Transaction.
Biklen, S. K. (2004). Trouble on memory lane: adults and self-retrospection in researching
youth. Qualitative inquiry, 10 (5), p. 715-730.
Blase, J. & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development:
teachers’ perspectives. Educational administration quarterly, 35(3), p. 349-78.
Butler, K. (2008). Principal preparation programs. District administration, 44 (10), p. 66-68.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2d
ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Elden, M. & Levin, M. (1991). “Cogenerative learning: bringing participation into action
research,” In W. F. Whyte (ed.), Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gentilucci, J., & Muto, C. (2007). Principals' influence on academic achievement: the student
perspective. NASSP bulletin, 91(3), 219-236.
Gossen, D. (1992). Restitution: Restructuring school discipline. Chapel Hill, NC: New view
publications.
Hess, F. (2007). What innovators can, and cannot do: Squeezing into local markets and cutting
deals. Education next, 7 (2).
Jones, K. R. & Perkins, D. F. (2004). Youth and adult perceptions of their relationships within
community-based youth programs. Youth society, 38 (1), p. 90-109.
Kirchner, G. (2005). Towards cooperative learning in elementary school physical education.
Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
Lambert, L. (2002). A framework for shared leadership. Beyond instructional leadership, 59 (8),
p. 37-40.
Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: can increasing ‘student voice’ lead to gains in
youth development. Teachers college record, 106 (4), p. 651-688.
Mitra, D. L. (2008). Student voice in school reform: building youth-adult partnerships that
strengthen schools and empower youth. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Panitz, T. (1996). Collaborative vs. cooperative learning: comparing the two definitions helps
understand the nature of interactive learning. Cooperative learning and college teaching, 8
(2).
Schneider, E. (1996). Giving students a voice in the classroom. Creating a climate for learning
54 (1), p. 22-26.
Shultz, J. J. & Cook-Sather, A. (2001). In our own words: students’ perspectives on school.
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Spillane et al. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective.
Educational researcher, 30 (3), p. 23-28.
Talbert, J. E. (1995). “Boundaries of teachers’ professional communities in U. S. high schools:
power and precariousness of the subject department,” In L. S. Siskin & J. W. Little (Eds.),
The subjects in question. New York: Teachers College Press.
Warner, D. (2010). Using student voice for school transformation. Eltham, AU: Eltham College
of Education Press.
Waters et al. (2003). Balanced leadership: what 30 years of research tells us about the effect of
leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: mid-continent research for education and
learning.
Wilkinson, A. (1998). Empowerment: Theory and practice. Personnel review, 27(1), p. 40-56.
Keywords
Cogenerative Dialogue, Student Voice, Educational Leadership, Elementary Education, Student Agency
Affiliations
Jonathan Damiani
Syracuse University-School of Education, United States
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.