Published
September 28, 2025
| Pages: 674-689 | Views: 538
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the differentiated instruction approach implemented at the first-grade level within the scope of the Century of Türkiye Education Model (CTEM), based on the perspectives of primary school teachers. The study examines the classroom reflections of the support and enrichment dimension structured under the CTEM. Designed as a case study, one of the qualitative research designs, the study involved 10 primary school teachers working in public schools during the 2024-2025 academic year, each of whom had at least one student with special educational needs (SEN) in their classroom. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the descriptive analysis method. The findings were presented within the framework of the following themes: content structure, instructional practices, assessment and evaluation processes, and support and enrichment practices. The teachers stated that they generally viewed the simplification of the content positively; however, they also emphasized that the new arrangements in the Turkish, Life Sciences, and Mathematics curricula have led to some challenges in students’ learning processes. Activity-based approaches were generally supported by the teachers; however, challenges related to the implementation process—such as crowded classrooms and lack of materials—were also highlighted. Although the diversity of assessment and evaluation practices has increased, teachers have pointed out certain limitations regarding time management and ease of implementation. While the theoretical framework for support and enrichment practices appears to be strong, there were deficiencies in implementation support and availability of materials. In conclusion, although the differentiated instruction framework within the CTEM offers an inclusive theoretical structure, the conditions for practical implementation need to be improved. In order to support the implementation of the model, it may be beneficial to provide guidance on differentiated content and offer material support in addition to teacher training.
Keywords: Century of Türkiye Education Model, inclusion, differentiation, support, enrichment, students with special educational needs.
Listen -
References
- Akyol, H., Çakıroğlu, A., & Kuruyer, H. G. (2017). A study on the development of reading skills of the students having difficulty in reading: Enrichment reading program. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 199–212. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/41
- Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
- Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
- Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056
- Başar, M. (2019). İlkokul öğrencilerinin gelişim özellikleri ve öğrenme. Pegem Akademi.
- Bhat, R. A. (2023). Inclusive education: Strategies for enhancing participation and achievement of students with special needs. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration, 3(1), 1625–1630. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373252189_INCLUSIVE_EDUCATION_STRATEGIES_FOR_ENHANCING_PARTICIPATION_AND_ACHIEVEMENT_OF_STUDENTS_WITH_SPECIAL_NEEDS
- Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment: Principles and practices. Pearson.
- Bural, B., & Öztürk, B. (2024). Özel gereksinimli bireylerle kavram öğretimi çalışılan araştırmaların belirli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi: Sistematik derleme [Examination of studies on concept teaching for individuals wıth special needs in terms of certain variables: a systematic review]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 70, 211–238. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1265401
- CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Çakmak, Z., & Işık, A. D. (2020). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin farklılaştırılmış öğretimi uygulama yeterlikleri ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar. Eğitim ve Bilim, 45(204), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8780
- Çetinkaya, E., & Kılıç, Ç. (2023). Öğretmen adaylarının üstün yetenekli bireylerin eğitimi konusundaki farkındalıkları. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 11(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.51383/gerjournal.2023.43
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
- Deunk, M. I., Doolaard, S., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Differentiation within and across classrooms: A systematic review of studies using direct classroom observations. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
- Deveci, Ö. ve Aykaç, N. (2018). Temel eğitimde yaşanan sorunları inceleyen çalışmaların değerlendirilmesi: Bir meta-sentez çalışması. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi – Journal of Qualitative Research Education, 7(1), 277-301. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c1s.13m
- Firman, E., & Sandiarsa, K. D. (2024). The effect of learning environment on students’ motivation in learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 10(4), 123–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jime.v10i4.7614
- Florian, L. (2019). On the necessary co-existence of special and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(5), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1622801
- Florian, L. (Ed.). (2014). The SAGE handbook of special education (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Florian, L., & Beaton, M. (2018). Inclusive pedagogy in action: Getting it right for every child. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(8), 870–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1412513
- Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
- Florian, L., & Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.778111
- Gaitas, S., & Alves Martins, M. (2017). Relationships between primary teachers’ beliefs and their practices in relation to differentiated instruction. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(5), 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1177983
- Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications. Guilford Press.
- Hanini Anne, N., & Mohd Rashid, S. M. (2024). Understanding and enhancing special education teachers’ competencies for inclusive practice: A comprehensive analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(6), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.6.9
- Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press.
- Karaman, P. (2021). The effect of formative assessment practices on student learning outcomes: A meta-analytical review. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(3), 802–820. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.870300
- Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. J., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A.-M. (2019). Flexible learning spaces facilitate interaction, collaboration and behavioural engagement in secondary school. PLOS ONE, 14(10), e0223607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223607
- Kaya, N. G., Mertol, H., Turhan, G., Araz, D., & Uçar, H. (2022). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitiminde farklılaştırma ve zenginleştirme uygulamalarına ilişkin yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi [Examination of postgraduate thesis on applications of differentiation and enhancement in education of gifted students]. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41, 102–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.2022.189
- Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
- Kupers, E., de Boer, A., Loopers, J., Bakker, A., & Minnaert, A. (2023). Differentiation and students with special educational needs: Teachers’ intentions and classroom interactions. In A. T. Bakker (Ed.), Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers (pp. 433–448). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31678-4_36
- Kurnaz, A. (2025). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilere okuma becerilerinin kazandırılması açısından Türkçe öğretim programı ve BİLSEM modülünün incelenmesi [Investigation of the Turkish teaching program and BİLSEM module in terms of developing reading skills for gifted]. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 9(1), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1619546
- Lo, C. O., & Feng, L.-C. (2020). Teaching higher order thinking skills to gifted students: A meta-analysis. Gifted Education International, 36(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420917854
- Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation] (S. Turan, Trans.). Nobel Yayıncılık. (Original work published 2009)
- Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Özel eğitim hizmetleri yönetmeliği. MEB Yayınları.
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2023). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli tanıtım kılavuzu. MEB Yayınları.
- Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (3 Mart, 2025). Hayat Bilgisi Dersi- 1. sınıf-1. öğrenme alanı: Ben ve okulum. Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/hayat-bilgisi-dersi/unite/96
- Muksalmina, M., Istiarsyah, I., Kamarullah, K., & Sabaruddin, S. (2024). How effective is differentiated instruction model for special needs students? Perspectives of inclusive teachers. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Special Education in South East Asia Region (ICSAR 2024), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.57142/picsar.v3i1.586
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- Ok, M. W., & Kim, W. (2017). Use of iPads and iPods for academic performance and engagement of PreK–12 students with disabilities: A research synthesis. Exceptionality, 25(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196446
- Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Özdemir, L. (2021). Türkiye’de hizmet içi eğitim süreci ve öğretmenlerin hizmet içi eğitim gereksinimlerinin nedenleri ile uygulamada karşılaşılan sorunlar hakkında literatür taraması [Problems with the application of the literature about causes of Türkiye in the in-service training of teachers in-service training process and requirements]. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 8(2), 495–522. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atdd/issue/63005/910421
- Paris, S. G., & Hamilton, E. E. (2009). The development of children’s reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 32–53). Routledge.
- Pianta, R. C., & Kraft-Sayre, M. (2003). Successful kindergarten transition: Your guide to connecting children, families, and schools. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
- Pozas, M., Letzel, V., Lindner, K.-T., & Schwab, S. (2021). DI (Differentiated Instruction) does matter! The effects of DI on secondary school students’ well-being, social inclusion and academic self-concept. Frontiers in Education, 6, 729027. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.729027
- Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012
- Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901
- Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for talent development. Prufrock Press.
- Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2013). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Prufrock Press.
- Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. ASCD.
- Strogilos, V. (2018). The value of differentiated instruction in the inclusion of students with special needs/disabilities in mainstream schools. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200003
- Silveira-Zaldivar, T., & Curtis, H. (2019). “I’m not trained for this!” And other barriers to evidence-based social skills interventions for elementary students with high functioning autism in inclusion. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(5), 429–436. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/933
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
- Topal, B., & Özsoy, G. (2025). Opinions and suggestions about teaching mathematics from teachers who support pupils with special learning difficulties in primary schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 17(1), 115–134. https://dx.doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2024.367
- UNESCO. (2024). Inclusion in education: All means all – Global education monitoring report 2020. Paris: UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/inclusion-education
- VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_5
- Wijekumar, K., Hudson, A., Lambright, K., Owens, J. K., Binks-Cantrell, E., Beerwinkle, A., & Stack, A. (2023). Knowledge acquisition and transformation (KAT) using text structures. The Reading League Journal, 4(2), 34–45. https://www.literacy.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Wijekumar_et_al_2023_KAT_article_The_Reading_League_Journal.pdf
- Whitmore, K. F., & Meyer, R. J. (2020). Literacy as meaning making: Reconceptualizing what counts in literacy learning. In K. F. Whitmore & R. J. Meyer (Eds.), Reclaiming literacies as meaning making: Literacy learning across time and space (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
- Yaman, E. (2010). Kalabalık sınıfların etkileri: Öğrenciler ne düşünüyor? [The effects of the crowded classrooms: What are the students thinking?]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 18(2), 403–414. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/817861
- Zhang, K., Yılmaz, R., Ustun, A. B., & Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G. (2022). Learning analytics in formative assessment: A systematic literature review [Special Issue]. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 14, 383–400. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1272054
Keywords
Century of Türkiye Education Model, inclusion, differentiation, support, enrichment, students with special educational needs, gifted
Affiliations
Ezgi Tozak
Ordu University
Ömer Faruk Tamul
Ordu University
Aycan Kaşık
Ordu University
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.