Evaluation of the Intensive English Language Teaching Programme for the Fifth Grade according to Students’ Views

References

1. REFERENCES
2. Abat, E. Z. Ç. (2016). The evaluation of 9th grade Mathematics curriculum according to CIPP evaluation model (Unpublished Master Thesis). Akdeniz University, Antalya.
3. Aksoy, E., Bozdoğan, D., Akbaş, U., Seferoğlu, G. (2018). Old wine in a new bottle: Implementation of intensive language program in the 5th grade in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 301-324.
4. Anh, V. T. K. (2018). Evaluation models in educational program: Strengths and weaknesses. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(2).
5. Arap, B. (2016). An investigation into the implementation of English preparatory programs at tertiary level in Turkey. (Master's thesis). Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
6. Aslan, M., & Saglam, M. (2017). Methodological investigation of the curriculum evaluation theses completed between 2006 and 2015 in Turkey. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(9), 1468-1478.
7. Berkant, H. G., Özaslan, D., & Doğan, E. (2019). The vıews of englısh language teachers about ıntensıve foreıgn language educatıon program. Journal of National Education, 48(1), 553-570.
8. Darama, E., Karaduman, F., Kahraman, K. & Gündoğdu, K. (2018). Evaluation of 5th grade English curriculum according to Shufflebeam’s context, input, process, product (CIPP) model. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 73-86.
9. Demirtaş, Z., & Erdem, S. (2015). Fifth grade English course curriculum: Comparison of the revised curriculum with the previous curriculum and teachers’ views related to the new curriculum. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 55-80.
10. Dilekli, Y. (2018). Evaluation of pilot scheme of secondary schools English preparatory class curriculum according to teachers’ views. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 8 (15) , 1399-1425.
11. Dinçer, A., & KOÇ, H. K. (2020). The implementation of an intensive English language program in the fifth grade in Turkey: A qualitative evaluation. The Journal of Theoretical Educational Science (JTES) 13(1), 25-43.
12. Erdem, S., & Yücel Toy, B. (2017). Determınatıon of the needs for foreıgn language orıented fıfth grade English currıculum. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(28).
13. Haznedar, B. (2010). Türkiye’de yabancı dil eğitimi: Reformlar, yönelimler ve öğretmenlerimiz [Foreign language education in Turkey: Reforms, trends and our teachers]. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 11–13.
14. Kambur, S. (2018). An evaluation of 5th grade intensive English language curriculum in terms of teacher opinions. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
15. Kayabaşı, O. & Köse, E. (2019). Investigation of English Language Teachers and School Principals’ Views on the Foreign Language-Based Implementation in 5th Grades in Secondary Schools. International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences, 1(2), 101-120.
16. Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice. Sage Publishing.
17. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned 4th edition-Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford University Press.
18. Macalister, J., & Nation, I. P. (2019). Language curriculum design. Routledge.
19. Madaus, G. F., Stufflebeam, D. L., Osterlind, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Evaluation in education and human services. Springer.
20. MONE (2013). Primary schools (primary and secondary schools) English course (2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades) curriculum. Journal of Communiqués dated March 2013 and numbered 2666.
21. MONE (2017). Ortaokul 5. sınıflarda yabancı dil ağırlıklı eğitim uygulaması [The implementation of foreign language intensive education in the fifth grades of secondary school]. April, 2021.
22. Özkan, M., Özdemir, E. B., & Tavşancıl, E. (2018). Opinions Regarding Giving Foreign Language Weighted Training at Fifth Grade Level. Journal of History School (JOHS), 11(34), 1293-1311.
23. Sağlam, D., & Akdemir, E. (2018). Opinions of students on the curriculum of English preparatory program Journal of Higher Education & Science, 8(2).
24. Şahin, F., & Göksoy, S. (2019). The problems ın the schools where foreıgn language educatıon ıs applıed for secondary schools fıfth grades and the solutıon recommendatıons. TURAN Center for Strategic Researches, 11(42), 180-189.
25. White, R. V. (1989). Curriculum studies and ELT. System, 17(1), 83–93.
26. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of research and development in education.
27. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model For Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Springer.
28. Thorpe, M. (1988). Handbook of education technology. Ellington, Percival and Race.
29. Yalçınkaya, D.G. & Taşdemir, M. (2019). Evaluatıon of foreıgn language ıntensıve currıculums ın the secondary school level Journal of Turkish Studies – Educational Sciences, 14(6), 2977-2994.
30. Yaman, İ. (2018). Learning English in Turkey: Challenges and Opportunities. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Research, (11), 161-175.
31. Yolcu, E., & Dimici, K. (2020). An analysis of foreign language oriented fifth grade English curriculum: Opinions of students, teachers and administrators. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 48-69.
32. White, J.P. (1971) The concept of curriculum evaluation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3:2, 101-112,
33. Wiles, J. (2008). Leading curriculum development. Corwin Press.
34. Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
35. Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation. Alternative approaches and practical guidelines, 2.

Keywords

Program evaluation, foreign language teaching, CIPP model

Affiliations