References
Adams, M. J. (1990). Learning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students’ science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 1-21.
Almasi, J. F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders’ sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schematic-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., & Mullis, I. V. S. (1988). Who reads best? Factors related to reading achievement in grades 3, 7, and 11. Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading, and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Atwell, P., & Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15, 1–10.
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Inviting students into the pursuit of meaning. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 225-241.
Bell, M. (2009/2010). Major new literacy initiative proposed in US Congress. Reading Today, 27(3), 1, 4.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., & Congdon, R. T. (1996). HLM. Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L Programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Bus, A. G. (2003). Socio-emotional requisites for learning to read. In A. van Kleeck, S. A. Stahl & E. B. Bauer (Eds.), On reading storybooks to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 3-15). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cadima, J., Leal, T., & Burchinal, M. (2010). The quality of teacher-student interactions: Associations with first graders’ academic and behavioral outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 457-482.
Calkins, L., Montgomery, K., Santman, D., & Falk, B. (1998). A teacher's guide to standardized tests: Knowledge is power. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Center on Education Policy. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
Center on Education Policy (2010). Policy implications for trends for Asian American students. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chambliss, M., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children's minds. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Chapman, M., Filipenko, M., McTavish, M., & Shapiro, J. (2007). First graders’ preferences for narrative and/or information books and perceptions of other boys’ and girls’ book preferences. Canadian Journal of Education, 30, 531‐553.
Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V., & Kober, N. (2009). State test score trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are all achievement gaps closing and is achievement rising for all? Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
Coiro, J. (2011). Talking about reading as thinking: Modeling the hidden complexities of online reading comprehension. Theory into Practice, 50, 107-115.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 214-257.
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. Routledge: New York.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, U.S. Government Printing Office.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). What happens to a dream deferred?: The continuing quest for equal educational opportunity. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 607-630). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dearing, E., Wimer, C., Simpkins, S. D., Lund, T., Bouffard, S. M., Caronongan, P., Kreider, H., & Weiss, H. (2009). Do neighborhood and home contexts help explain why low-income children miss opportunities to participate in activities outside of school? Developmental Psychology, 45, 1545–1562.
Delpit, L. (1998). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
Dreher, M. J. (2000). Fostering reading for learning. In L. Baker, M. J. Dreher, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.),
Engaging Young Readers: Promoting Achievement and Motivation (pp. 68-93). New York: Guilford Press.
Dreher, M. J. & Kletzien, S. B. (2015). Teaching informational text in K-3 classrooms: Best practices to help children read, write, and learn from nonfiction. New York: Guilford Press.
Dudley-Marling, C., & Lucas, K. (2009). Pathologizing the language and culture of poor children. Language Arts, 86, 362-370.
Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202-224.
Duke, N. K., & Roberts, K. M. (2010). The genre-specific nature of reading comprehension. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 74–86). London: Routledge.
Durkin, D. (1978/1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.
Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. Journal of Educational Research, 103, 262-273.
Feitelson, D., & Goldstein, Z. (1986). Patterns of book ownership and reading to young children in Israeli school-oriented and non-school-oriented families. The Reading Teacher, 39, 924-930.
Fleener, C. E., Morrison, S. L., Linek, W. M., & Rasinski, T. V. (1997). Recreational reading choices: How do children select books? In W. M. Linek & E. G. Sturtevant (Eds.), Exploring literacy (pp. 75-84). Commerce, TX: College Reading Association.
Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1986). Types of texts: The match between what students read in basals and what they encounter in tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 284-297.
Goatley, V. J., Brock, C. H., & Raphael, T. E. (1995). Diverse learners participating in regular education "book clubs.” Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 352-380.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1998). Role of cognitively stimulating home environment in children’s academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 69, 1448-1460.
Green-Powell, P. A., Hilton, A. A., & Joseph, C. L. (2011). Creating collaborative partnership with local churches to improve academic performance of K-12 public schools. US-China Education Review, 8, 64-69.
Guthrie, J. T., Anderson, E., Alao, S. & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of concept-oriented reading instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 343-355.
Guthrie, J. T., & McCann, A. D. (1996) Idea circles: Peer collaborations for conceptual learning. In L. B. Gambrell & J. F. Almasi (Eds.). Lively discussions! Fostering engaged reading (pp. 87-105). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Guthrie, J. T., & McRae, A. (2011). Reading engagement among African American and European American students. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 115-142). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., Coddington, C. S., Klauda, S. L., Wigfield, A., & Barbosa, P. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 195-214.
Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42, 237-250.
Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C. (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 145-162.
Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A. D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C. C., Rice, M. E., Fabisch, F., Hunt, B., & Mitchell, A. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly. 31, 306-332.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 331-341.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., Scafiddi, N. T., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 403-423.
Hall, C., & Coles, M. (1999). Children's reading choices. New York: Routledge.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe. Education Review, 17, 110-118.
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development 74, 1368–78.
Jeong, J., Gaffney, J. S., & Choi, J.-O. (2010). Availability and use of informational texts in second-, third-, and fourth-grade classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 44, 435-456.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989/1990). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47, 29-33.
Kamil, M., & Lane, D. (1998). Researching the relationship between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D. Reinking, L. McKenna, L. Labbo & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kellett, M. (2009). Children as researchers: What can we learn from them about the impact of poverty on literacy opportunities? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13, 395-408.
Ketch, A. (2005). Conversation: The comprehension connection. The Reading Teacher, 59, 8-15.
Kletzien, S. B. (1999, December). Children’s reading preferences and information books. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
Langer, J. A. (1986). Children reading and writing: Structures and strategies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Lee, V. E., Croninger, R. G., & Smith, J. B. (1997). Course-taking, equity, and mathematics learning: Testing the constrained curriculum hypothesis in U.S. secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 99-121.
Ly, C. (2010). More than a library?: Urban poverty and an exploratory look at the role of a neighborhood institution. Perspectives on Urban Education, 7, 22-33.
Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J., & Lord, H. (2005). Organized activities as developmental contexts for children and adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson & J. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development (pp. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Many, J., Fyfe, R., Lewis, G., & Mitchell, E. (1996). Traversing the topical landscape: Exploring students' self-directed reading-writing-research processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 122-135.
Martinez, M. G., Roser, N. L., Worthy, J., Strecker, S., & Gough, P. (1997). Classroom libraries and children's book selections: Redefining "access" in self-selected reading. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 46, 265-272.
McGill-Franzen, A., & Allington, R. L. (1999). Putting books in the classroom seems necessary but not sufficient. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 67.
Meyer, K. E. (2010). A collaborative approach to reading workshop in the middle years. Reading Teacher, 63, 501-507.
Moje, E. B., Stockdill, D., Kim, K., & Kim, H. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. A. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 453-486). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Moll, L.C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzales, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 132-141.
Morrow, L. M., Pressley, M., Smith, J. K., & Smith, M. (1997). The effect of a literature-based program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse background. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 54-76.
Morrow, L. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (1986). Increasing children's use of literature through program and physical design changes. Elementary School Journal, 83, 131-137.
Moss, B. (2003). Exploring the literature of fact: Children's nonfiction trade books in the elementary classroom. New York: Guilford Press.
Moss, B. (2008). The information text gap: The mismatch between non-narrative text types in basal readers and 2009 NAEP recommended guidelines. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 201-209.
Moss, G., & McDonald, J. W. (2004). The borrowers: Library records as unobtrusive measures of children's reading preferences. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 401-412.
Mullens, J. E., & Gaylor, K. (1999). Measuring classroom instructional processes: Using survey and case study field test results to improve item construction (Working Paper No. 1999-08). Washington, DC: Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA’s Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in primary schools in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. [Available at http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2006/intl_rpt.html]
Murphy, P., Wilkinson, I. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740-764.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Reading framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (2007). The nation’s report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (2009). The nation’s report card: Reading 2009 (NCES 2010-458). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (2010a). How the samples of schools and students are selected for the main assessments: State and national. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/nathow.asp on August 18, 2010.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (2010b). Reading: What does the NAEP reading assessment measure? Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/whatmeasure.asp on August 16, 2010.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (2011). Interpreting NAEP reading results. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/interpret-results.asp on December 31, 2011.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Ness, M. (2011). Teachers' use of and attitudes toward informational text in K-5 classrooms. Reading Psychology, 32, 28-53.
Neuman, S. B. (1999). Books make a difference: A study of access to literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 286-311.
Neuman, S. B. (2006). The knowledge gap: Implications for early education. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 29-40). New York: Guilford.
Neuman, S. B. (2010). Lessons from my mother: Reflections on the National Early Literacy Panel report. Educational Researcher, 39, 301-304.
Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 8-27.
Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. C. (2012). Giving our children a fighting chance: Poverty, literacy, and the development of information capital. New York: Teachers College Press.
Nippold, M. A., Duthie, J. K., & Larsen, J. (2005). Literacy as a leisure activity: Free-time preferences of older children and young adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 93-102.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. P.L. 107–110. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
Oakes, J., & Saunders, M. (2002). Access to textbooks, instructional materials, equipment, and technology: Inadequacy and inequality in California's public schools. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles.
Orfield, G. (2001). Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation [Electronic Version]. Rethinking Schools, 16. Retrieved from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/16_01/Seg161.shtml
Palardy, G. J. (2008). Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: A multiple group, multilevel latent growth curve analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 21-49.
Pappas, C. C. (2006). The information book genre: Its role in integrated science literacy research and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 226-250.
Pease-Alvarez, L., & Samway, K. D. (2008). Negotiating a top-down reading program mandate: The experiences of one school. Language Arts, 86, 32–41.
Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pincus, A. R. H. (2005). What’s a teacher to do? Navigating the worksheet curriculum. Reading Teacher, 59, 75-79.
Portes, P., & Salas, S. (2009). Poverty and its relation to development and literacy. In L. M. Morrow, R. Rueda & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy and diversity (pp. 97-113). New York: Guilford.
Pressley, M. (2002). Effective beginning reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 165-188.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). Literacy instruction in 10 fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159-194.
Project for Excellence in Journalism (2004). The state of the news media 2004: An annual report on American journalism. Retrieved from http://stateofthemedia.org/2004/newspapers-intro/audience/
Purcell-Gates, V. (1995). Other people’s words: The cycle of low literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N. K., & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 8-45.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murnane & G. Duncan (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children (pp. 91-116). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1992). A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 545-554.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35, 185-205.
Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 107 –117.
Sheldon, W. D., & Carrillo, R. (1952). Relation of parent, home and certain developmental characteristics to children's reading ability. Elementary School Journal, 52, 262-270.
Singer, H., McNeil, J. D., & Furse, L. L. (1984). Relationship between curriculum scope and reading achievement in elementary schools. The Reading Teacher, 37, 608-612.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453.
Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
Smith, M. C. (2011). Which in- and out-of-school factors explain variations in learning across different socio economic groups? Findings from South Africa. Comparative Education, 47, 79-102.
Smith, M. S., Chudowsky, N., Ginsburg, A., Hauser, R., Jennings, J., & Lewis, S. (2012). NAEP background questions: An underused national resource. Retrieved from http://www.nagb.org/publications/expert-panel-naep-bq-report.pdf
Smith, N. B. (1986). American reading instruction. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
Sonnenschein, S., & Schmidt, D. (2000). Fostering home and community connections to support children's reading development. In L. Baker, M. J. Dreher, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 264-284). NY: Guilford Press.
Southern Education Foundation. (2013). A new majority: Low income students in the south and west. Retrieved from http://www.southerneducation.org/cmspages/getfile.aspx?guid=0bc70ce1-d375-4ff6-8340-f9b3452ee088
Spear-Swerling, L., Brucker, P. O., & Alfano, M. P. (2010). Relationships between sixth-graders’ reading comprehension and two different measures of print exposure. Reading and Writing, 23, 73-96.
Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121-165.
Timion, C. S. (1992). Children's book selection strategies. In J. W. Irwin & M. A. Doyle (Eds.), Reading and writing connections: Learning from research (pp. 204-222). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2011). National school lunch program. Retrieved from http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/lunch/
United States Department of Education (USDE) (2002). Public law 107-110: The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (pp. 670). Washington, DC: Department of Education.
United States Department of Education (USDE), Institute of Educational Sciences (IES), and National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (2007). 2005 NAEP data companion. Washington DC: Department of Education.
Valli, L., Croninger, R., Chambliss, M., Graeber, A., & Buese, D. (2008). Test driven: High-stakes accountability in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Venezky, R. L. (2000). The origins of the present-day chasm between adult literacy needs and school literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 19-39.
Vitale, M. R., & Romance, N. R. (2011). Adaptation of a knowledge-based instructional intervention to accelerate student learning in science and early literacy in grades 1 and 2. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5, 79-93.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children's vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37, 265-279.
White, S., Chen, J., & Forsyth, B. (2010). Reading-related literacy activities of American adults: Time spent, task types, and cognitive skills used. Journal of Literacy Research, 42, 276-307.
Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1998). Dealing with diversity: Achievement gaps in reading literacy among New Zealand students. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 144-167.
Williams, J. P. (2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure. Journal of Special Education, 39, 6-18.
Willson, V. L., & Rupley, W. H. (1997). A structural equation model for reading comprehension based on background, phonemic and strategy knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 45-63.
