References
Akama, K. (2006). Relations among self-efficacy, goal setting, and metacognitive experiences in problem-solving. Psychological Reports, 98(3), 895-907. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.98.3.895-907.
Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalization method affect learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9009-6.
Billingsley, F., White, O.R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment. 2(2), 229-241.
Carpenter, T. P., Ansell, E., Franke, M. L., Fennema, E., & Weisbeck, L. (1993). Models of problem solving: A study of kindergarten children's problem-solving processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 428-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/749152.
Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds‐Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(6), 583-595. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080605.
Çelik, D., & Güler, M. (2013). Examination of realistic problem solving skills of sixth grade students. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Educational Faculty, 12(20), 180-195.
Daniel, G. E. (2003). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 61-82). Routledge.
Desoete, A. (2009). Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: How you test is what you get. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9026-0.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Huylebroeck, A. (2006). Metacognitive skills in Belgian third grade children (age 8 to 9) with and without mathematical learning disabilities. Metacognition and Learning, 1(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-8152-9.
Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2002). Off-line metacognition: A domain-specific retardation in young children with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 123-139. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511279
Efklides, A., & Petkaki, C. (2005). Effects of mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction, 15,415–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.010.
Efklides, A. (1999). Feelings as subjective evaluation of cognitive processing: how reliable are they? Keynote address at 5th European Conference on Psychological Assessment, Patras, Greece.
Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297–323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?. Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Hamlett, C. L., Finelli, R., & Courey, S. J. (2004). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.635.
Geary, D. C. (2010). Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 130-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.008.
Güzel-Özmen, R. (2006). The effectiveness of modified cognitive strategy instruction in writing on mildly mentally retarded Turkish students. Exceptional Children, 72, 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200302.
Hanich, L. B., Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.615.
House, A. W., House, B. G., & Campbell, M. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formula and distribution effect. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3, 37-57.
Johnstone, C. J., Bottsford-Miller, N. A., & Thompson, S. J. (2006). Using the think-aloud method (cognitive labs) to evaluate test design for students with disabilities and English language learners Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using Cognitive Tools to Represent Problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391.
Karabulut, A., & Özkubat, U. (2019). Problem Solving. In Alptekin, S. (Eds), Mathematics in Special Education (pp. 263-293). Eğiten.
Karabulut, A., & Özmen, E. R. (2018). Effect of “understand and solve!” strategy ınstruction on mathematical problem solving of students with mild ıntellectual disabilities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018245314
Karasar, N. (2014). Research method. Nobel.
Küçük- Özcan, Z. Ç. (2000). Teaching metacognitive strategies to 6th grade students. Master thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
Lucangeli, D., & Cabrele, S. (2006). The relationship of metacognitive knowledge, skills and beliefs in children with and without mathematical learning disabilities. In A. Desoete & M. V. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in Mathematics Education (pp. 103-133) Nova Science.
Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003088013286.
Montague, M., & Applegate, B. (1993). Middle school students mathematical problem solving: An analysis of think-aloud protocols. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511157.
Montague, M., & Applegate, B. (2000). Middle school students' perceptions, persistence, and performance in mathematical problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(3), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511165.
Montague, M., & Dietz, S. (2009). Evaluating the evidence base for cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem solving. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500302.
Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949202500404.
Montague, M. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000204.
Montague, M. (2003). Solve it!: A practical approach to teaching mathematical problem solving skills. Exceptional Innovations.
Montague, M. (2007). Self‐regulation and mathematics instruction. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00232.x.
Montague, M. (2008). Self-regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035524.
Montague, M., Applegate, B., & Marquard, K. (1993). Cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8(4), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000204.
Montague, M., Warger, C, & Morgan, H. (2000). Solve It!: Strategy instruction to improve mathematical problem solving. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15(2), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP15027.
Ostad, A., & Sorensen, P.M. (2007). Private speech and strategy-use patterns: Bidirectional comparisons of children with and without mathematical difficulties in a developmental perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400010101.
Özdemir, İ. E., & Pape, S. J. (2012). Supporting students’ strategic competence: A case of a sixth-grade mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0033-8
Özkubat, U. (2019). An examination of the relationships between cognitive strategies and metacognitive functions used during mathematical problem solving by the students with learning disabilities, low achieving, and average achieving. Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara.
Özkubat, U., & Karabulut, A. (2021). Cognitive Strategy Instruction for Mathematical Problem Solving In Kargın, T. Güldenoğlu, B. İ. (Eds), Teaching Mathematics in Special Education (pp. 142-171). Pegem Academy Publishing.
Özkubat, U., Karabulut, A., & Özmen, E. R. (2020). Mathematical problem-solving processes of students with special needs: A cognitive strategy instruction model 'Solve It!'. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(5), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020562131
Özkubat, U., & Özmen, E. R. (2018). Analysis of mathematical problem solving process of students with learning disability: Implementation of think aloud protocol. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 19(1), 155-180. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.299494.
Özkubat, U., & Özmen, E. R. (2020). Turkish Adaptation of the Metacognitive Experiences Questionnaire in Solving Math Problems. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(31), 3958-3984. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.736793.
Özkubat, U., & Özmen, E. R. (2021). Determining the cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by students with learning disabilities and low- and average-achieving during mathematical problem solving. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.736761
Özsoy, G. (2005). The relationship between problem solving skills and mathematical achievement. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 25(3), 179-190.
Özsoy, G. (2017). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 67-82. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/278
Pape, S. J., & Smith, C. (2002). Self-regulating mathematics skills. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102-5.
Passolunghi, M. C., Marzocchi, G. M., & Fiorillo, F. (2005). Selective effect of inhibition of literal or numerical irrelevant information in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or arithmetic learning disorder (ALD). Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 731-753. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2803-1.
Pressley, M., Borkwski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(8), 857-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90069-4.
Rosenzweig, C., Krawec, J., & Montague, M. (2011). Metacognitive strategy use of eighth-grade students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving: a think-aloud analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6) 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410378445.
Choenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.
Schudmak, W. (2014). Metacognitive strategies employed during mathematical problem solving: a comparative case study of fifth graders who are gifted and have ADHD. Doctoral Dissertations, George Mason University, Fairfax.
Soydan, Ş. (2001). Development of instruments for the assessment of metacognitive skills in mathematics: an alternative assessment attempt. Master thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306-314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.306.
Sweeney, C. M. (2010). The metacognitive functioning of middle school students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving. Doctoral dissertation, University of Miami, Florida.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
Whitby, P. J. S. (2012). The effects of Solve It! on the mathematical word problem solving ability of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 28(2) 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612468764.
Wilson, J., & Clarke, D. (2002). Towards the modelling of mathematical metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217394.
Wong, B. Y. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(4), 300-322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510212.
