Seeing the wood from the trees: A critical policy analysis of ıntersections between social class inequality and education in twenty-first century Ireland

Kevin Cahill

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015) IEJEE Special Issue Contemporary Irish Education

Seeing the wood from the trees: A critical policy analysis of ıntersections between social class inequality and education in twenty-first century Ireland

Kevin Cahill

Published August 22, 2017 | Pages: 301-316 | Views: 1835

Download PDF

SHARE

Abstract

This paper is a critical policy analysis of intersections between social class inequality and education policy in Ireland. The focus is upon contemporary policy and legislation such as The Irish Constitution and equality legislation; social inclusion policies such as the DEIS scheme; literacy and numeracy policy documents; as well as current government policy statements on education. It utilises Stephen Ball’s policy analysis tools of policy as text, policy as discourse and policy effects to examine the social, cultural and political constructs of policy and legislation influencing social class inequality in education in Ireland (Ball, 1993). The focus is upon the refusal to name social class as a significant issue despite the weight of evidence showing the key influence class position and access to economic and cultural resources has on one’s educational opportunities, experiences and outcomes. The approach taken here is discursive in the sense that the documents are the data and the findings are infused with detailed theoretical discussion of contemporary issues around inequality in education in Ireland. The analysis finds that the absence of social class in official policy and legislative discourses is indicative of a growing neoliberalisation of education policy in Ireland where increased foci on international comparisons and a consumer-driven philosophy of educational provision militate against equality for students from lower socio-economic groups.

<p>This paper is a critical policy analysis of intersections between social class inequality and education policy in Ireland. The focus is upon contemporary policy and legislation such as The Irish Constitution and equality legislation; social inclusion policies such as the DEIS scheme; literacy and numeracy policy documents; as well as current government policy statements on education. It utilises Stephen Ball’s policy analysis tools of policy as text, policy as discourse and policy effects to examine the social, cultural and political constructs of policy and legislation influencing social class inequality in education in Ireland (Ball, 1993). The focus is upon the refusal to name social class as a significant issue despite the weight of evidence showing the key influence class position and access to economic and cultural resources has on one’s educational opportunities, experiences and outcomes. The approach taken here is discursive in the sense that the documents are the data and the findings are infused with detailed theoretical discussion of contemporary issues around inequality in education in Ireland. The analysis finds that the absence of social class in official policy and legislative discourses is indicative of a growing neoliberalisation of education policy in Ireland where increased foci on international comparisons and a consumer-driven philosophy of educational provision militate against equality for students from lower socio-economic groups.</p>

Listen -

References

Apple, M. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1 2), 11-29.
Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 13(2), 10-17.
Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. Oxon: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 36(3), 306-313.
Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). 'I heard it on the grapevine': 'Hot' knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377-400.
Beckett, L. (2014). Raising teachers’ voice on achievement in urban schools in England: An introduction. The Urban Review, 1-17.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1996). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. California: Stanford University Press.
Cahill, K., & Hall, K. (2014). Choosing schools: Explorations in post-primary school choice in an urban Irish working class community. Irish Educational Studies, 33(4), 383-397.
Codd, J. A. (1988). The construction and deconstruction of educational policy documents. Journal of Education Policy, 3(3), 235-247.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Conway, P. F. (2013). Cultural flashpoint: The politics of teacher education reform in Ireland. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 51-72.
DES. (2005). DEIS: An action plan for educational inclusion. Dublin: The Stationery Office
Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P.-L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068-1090.
Education (Admission to Schools) Bill (2015). Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Elwood, J., & Murphy, P. (2015). Assessment systems as cultural scripts: A sociocultural theoretical lens on assessment practice and products. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 182-192.
Equal Status Act (2000,2004). Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Equality Act (2004). Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Foucault, M., Faubion, J. D., Gordon, C., Rabinow, P., & Hurley, R. J. (2000). Power: Essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984, Volume III. London: Penguin.
Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis. Oxon: Routledge.
Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q., & Smith, G. N. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Habermas, J. (1970). Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry, 13(1), 360-375.
Ireland, G. o. (1965). Investment in Education Report. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Ireland, G. o. (2011). Government for National Recovery 2011-2016. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Irish Constitution (1937). Dublin: The Stationery Office
Kenway, J., Kraack, A., & Hickey-Moody, A. (2006). Masculinity beyond the metropolis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kitching, K. (2010). An excavation of the racialised politics of viability underpinning education policy in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 29(3), 213-229.
Lynch, K. (2000, 15 December 2000). Realising change: Structural and ideological considerations. Paper presented at the 10th Anniversary conference of the Equality Studies Centre, University College Dublin.
Lynch, K. (2014). Control by numbers: new managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education(ahead-of-print), 1-18.
Lynch, K., & Baker, J. (2005). Equality in education: An equality of condition perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 3(2), 131-164.
Lynch, K., & Lodge, A. (2002). Equality and power in schools: Redistribution, recognition and representation. London: Routledge Falmer.
Lynch, K., & Moran, M. (2006). Markets, schools and the convertibility of economic capital: The complex dynamics of class choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(2), 221-235.
Mac Ruairc, G. (2009). ‘Dip, dip, sky blue, who's it? NOT YOU’: children's experiences of standardised testing: A socio-cultural analysis. Irish Educational Studies, 28(1), 47-66.
McCoy, S., Smyth, E., Watson, D., & Darmody, M. (2014). Leaving school in Ireland: A longitudinal study of post-school transitions Research Series. Dublin: ESRI.
Mills, S. (2003). Michel Foucault. London: Routledge.
O'Connor, N., & Staunton, C. (2015). Cherishing all equally: Economic inequality in Ireland. Dublin: TASC.
O'Sullivan, D. (2005). Cultural politics and Irish education since the 1950s: Policy paradigms and power. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Ozga, J. (1990). Policy research and policy theory: A comment on Fitz and Halpin. Journal of Education Policy, 5(4), 359-362.
Reay, D. (2007). ’Unruly Places’: Inner-city comprehensives, middle-class imaginaries and working-class children. Urban Studies, 44(7), 1191-1201.
Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365.
Spring, N. (2007). Tracing the language of educational disadvantage. In P. D. a. L. Gilligan (Ed.), Beyond Educational Disadvantage (pp. 3-9). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Thrupp, M. (2006). Taking school contexts more seriously: The social justice challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(3), 308-328. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00348.x
Thrupp, M., Lauder, H., & Robinson, T. (2002). School composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5), 483-504.
Tormey, R. (2010). The silent politics of educational disadvantage and the national anti-poverty strategy. Irish Educational Studies, 29(2), 189-199.
UNICEF. (2002). A league table of educational disadvantage in rich nations Innocenti Report Card (Vol. 4). Florence, Italy.
Weir, S., & Archer, P. (2005). A review of procedures to select schools for support to deal with educational disadvantage. The Irish Journal of Education/Iris Eireannach an Oideachais, 36, 63-85.
Weir, S., McAvinue, L., Moran, E., & O'Flaherty, A. (2014). A report on the evaluation of DEIS at second level. Dublin: Education Research Centre.
Wilkinson, I. A. G., Hattie, J. A., Parr, J. M., Townsend, M. A. R., Fung, I., Ussher, C., Robinson, T. (2000). Influence of peer effects on learning outcomes: A review of the literature. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies nearly always do better. London: Allan Lane/Penguin Press.
Youdell, D. (2011). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. Oxon: Routledge.

Keywords

Critical policy analysis, Educational inequality, Social class and education, Irish education policy. Introduction

Affiliations

Kevin Cahill

University College Cork, Ireland

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Cahill, K. (2017). Seeing the wood from the trees: A critical policy analysis of ıntersections between social class inequality and education in twenty-first century Ireland. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 301–316. Retrieved from https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/114