Abstract
As qualitative research undertakings are not independent of the researcher, the “indissoluble interrelationship between interpreter and interpretation” (Thomas & James, 2006, p. 782) renders it necessary for researchers to understand that their text is a representation, a version of the truth that is the product of writerly choices, and that it is discursive. Endlessly creative, artistic and political, as there is no single interpretative truth, the interpretative process facilitates the refashioning of representations, the remaking of choices and the probing of discourses. As a consequence of the particularity of any researcher’s account, issues pertaining to researcher identity and authorial stance always remain central to research endeavours (Kamler & Thomson, 2006, p. 68; Denzin & Lincoln 2011, pp. 14-15). Therefore, researchers are encouraged to be reflexive about their analyses and research accounts (Elliott, 2005, p. 152), as reflexivity helps spotlight the role of the researcher as narrator. In turn, spotlighting the researcher as narrator foregrounds a range of complex issues about voice, representation and interpretive authority (Chase, 2005, p. 657; Genishi & Glupczynski, 2006, p. 671; Eisenhart, 2006). In essence, therefore, this paper is reflective of the challenges of “doing” qualitative research in educational settings. Its particular focus-the shaping of beginning primary teachers’ identities, in Ireland, throughout the course of their initial year of occupational experience, post-graduation- endeavours to highlight issues pertaining to the researcher as narrator (O’Sullivan, 2014).
Listen -
References
Akkerman, S.F. & Meijer, P.C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 308-319.
Borko, H., Liston, D. & Whitcomb, J.A. (2007). Genres of Empirical Research in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 3-11.
Borman, K.M., Clarke, C., Cotner, B. & Lee, R. (2006). Cross-Case Analysis. In: Green, J.L., Camilli, G. & Elmore, P.B. (Eds.) Complementary Methods in Education Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 123-139.
Brenner, M.E. (2006). Interviewing in Educational Research. In: Green, J. L., Camilli, G. & Elmore, P. B. (Eds.). Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 357-370.
Carlsen, A. (2005). Only when I laugh? Notes on the becoming interview. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 239-255.
Chase, S.E. (2005). Narrative Inquiry - Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Voices. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd Edition. London: Sage, 651-679.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education, 6th Edition. London: Routledge.
Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J (2006). Narrative Inquiry. In: Green, J.L., Camilli, G. & Elmore, P.B. (Eds.). Complementary Methods in Education Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 477-487.
Conway, P. F., Murphy, R. & Rutherford, V. (2014). ‘Learningplace’ Practices and Pre-service Teacher Education in Ireland: Knowledge Generation, Partnerships and Pedagogy.In: McNamara, O, Murray, J. & Jones, M. (Eds.). Workplace Learning in Teacher Education: International Practice and Policy. Amsterdam: Springer, 221-241.
Curry, M., Jaxon, K., Russell, J. L., Callahan, M. A. & Bicais, J. (2008). Examining the practice of beginning teachers’ micropolitical literacy within professional inquiry communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 660-673.
Day, C. & Gu, Q. (2010). The New Lives of Teachers. London: Routledge.
Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2011). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th Edition. London: Sage, 1-19.
Eisenhart, M. (2006). Representing qualitative data. In: Green, J.L., Camilli, G. & Elmore, Erlbaum Associates, 567-581.
Elliott, J. (2005). Using Narrative in Social Research. London: Sage.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From Preparation to Practice: Designing a Continuum to Strengthen and Sustain Teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2010). Multiple Meanings of New Teacher Induction. In: Wang, J., Odell, S. J. & Clift, R.T. (Eds.) Past, Present and Future Research on Teacher Induction: An Anthology for Researchers, Policy Makers, and Practitioners, Plymouth (UK): Rowman & Littlefield, 15-30.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
Genishi, C. & Glupczynski, T. (2006). Language and literacy research: Multiple methods and perspectives. In: Green, J.L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P.B. (Eds.) Complementary Methods in Education Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 657-679.
Goos, M. (2005). A Sociocultural Analysis of the Development of Pre-Service and Beginning Teachers’ Pedagogical Identities as Users of Technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 35-59.
Hatt, B. (2007). Street smarts vs. book smarts: The figured world of smartness in the lives of marginalized, urban youth. The Urban Review, 39(2), 145-166.
Hermans, H.J.M. (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 31-50.
Hermans, H.J.M. (2012). Dialogical Self Theory and the Increasing Multiplicity of I-Positions in a Globalizing Society: An Introduction. In: Hermans, H.J.M. (Ed.) Applications of Dialogical Self Theory. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 137, 1-21.
Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G. & James, D. (2008). Understanding Learning Culturally: Overcoming the Dualism Between Social and Individual Views of Learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27-47.
Holland, D., Lachiocotte, W. D., Skinner, D. & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. London: Harvard University Press.
Kamler, B. & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping Doctoral Students Write - Pedagogies for Supervision. London: Routledge.
Kardos, S.M. & Johnson, S.M. (2007). On Their Own and Presumed Expert: New Teachers’ Experience with Their Colleagues. Teachers College Record, 109(9), 2083-2106.
Kelchtermans, G. & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction. A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialisation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 105-120.
Kelchtermans, G. (2008). Study, stance, and stamina in the research on teachers’ lives: A rejoinder to Robert V. Bullough, Jr. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 27-36.
Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd Ed., London: Sage.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning - Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacMahon, B. (1992). The Master. Dublin: Poolbeg.
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods, 3rd Edition. London: Sage.
Norman, P. J. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2005). Mind activity in teaching and mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 679-697.
O’Sullivan, Daniel J. (2014). Beginning primary teachers’ perspectives on becoming a teacher in the workplace: Contextual, emotional, and temporo-spatial dimensions of identity shaping, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University College Cork.
Available: Cork Open Research Archive (CORA): http://cora.ucc.ie/bitstream/ handle/10468/1320/O%27SullivanDJ_%20PhD2014.pdf?sequence=2
Schempp, P. G., Sparkes, A. C., & Templin, T. J. (1993). The micropolitics of teacher induction. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 447-472.
Stake, R.E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. London: The Guilford Press.
Thomas, G. & James, D. (2006). Reinventing grounded theory: some questions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal, 32(6), 767-795.
Thomas, G. (2009). How to do your Research Project. London: Sage.
Thomas, G. (2011). The case: generalisation, theory and phronesis in case study. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 21-35.
Thomas, G. (2012). Changing our landscape of inquiry for a new science of education. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 26-51.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice - Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yin, R.K. (2006). Case Study Methods. In: Green, J.L., Camilli, G. & Elmore, P.B. (Eds.). Complementary Methods in Education Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 111-122.
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research, 4th Edition. London: Sage.
Zembylas, M. (2003). Interrogating “Teacher Identity”: Emotion, Resistance, and Self-Formation. Educational Theory, 53(1), 107-127.
