Published
February 7, 2019
| Pages: 273-278 | Views: 317
References
Gardner, D. G., Dukes, R. L., & Discenza, R. (1993). Effects of computer use on computer attitudes and computer confidence: A causal modeling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 427-440.
Gerick, J., Eickelmann, B., & Bos, W. (2017). The international computer and information literacy study from a European perspective: Introduction to the Special Issue. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 707–715.
Güzeller, C. O. (2011). PISA 2009 Türkiye örnekleminde öğrencilerin bilgisayar öz-yeterlik inançları ve bilgisayar tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 183-203.
Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and application. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. California: Sage Publications Inc.
Huang, H. Y. (2016). Mixture random-effect IRT models for controlling extreme response style on rating scales. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1706), 1-15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01706.
Maij-de Meij, A. M., Kelderman, H., & Van der Flier, H. (2008). Fitting a mixture item response theory model to personality questionnaire data: Characterizing latent classes and investigating possibilities for improving prediction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 611–631.
Ölmez, İ. B. & Cohen, A. S. (2018). A mixture partial credit analysis of math anxiety. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(4), 611–630. DOI: 10.21449/ijate.455175.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework adresinden alındı.
Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R. & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students' ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers & Education, 102, 103-116. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.08.001.
Scherer, R., Rohatgi, A. & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Students' profiles of ICT use: Identification, determinants, and relations to achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 486-499.
The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2014). Press release. https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/studies/IEA%20ICILS%202013%20Press%20Release.pdf
Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st-century skills: Learning for life in our times. Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
von Davier, M. & Rost, J. (2017). Logistic mixture-distribution response models. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory, volume one: Models (p. 393-406). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Yalçın, S. (2018). Data fit comparison of mixture item response theory models and traditional models. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(2), 301-313. doi: 10.21449/ijate.402806.
Keywords
graded response model, mixture item response theory, latent class analysis, mixture graded response model, information and communication technologies
Affiliations
Seher Yalçın
Ankara University
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.