The impact of notebooking on teacher candidates’ construction of knowledge
Keywords:
Observation, Curriculum, Constructivist, Teacher CandidatesAbstract
Teacher education preparation programs must adapt to changing science education reform
movements that identify notebooking as an effective means to increase children’s’ science process
skills and content knowledge. This study addresses the question, “What are the structures and
thinking processes that teacher candidates utilize when writing in notebooks?” Specifically, how do
they express their thoughts during an observational-based prompt writing experience in an
undergraduate, integrated science and mathematics methods course? Sixteen teacher candidates at a
Midwestern university in the United States completed an eight-week assignment during the spring
2012 semester using notebooks. Results indicate the participants could be placed into three distinct
categories of processing and formatting the notebooks which are described in detail with supporting
examples.
Downloads
References
states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS.
Aschbacher, P., & Alonzo, A. (2006). Examining the utility of elementary science notebooks for
formative assessment purposes. Educational Assessment, 11(3-4), 179-203
Campbell, B., & Fulton, L. (2003). Science notebooks: Writing about inquiry. Heinemann: Portsmouth, NH.
Endreny, A. (2010). Urban 5th graders conceptions during a place-based inquiry unit on watersheds.
Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 47(5), 501-517.
Fulton, L., & Campbell, B. (2004). Student centered notebooks. Science and Children, 42(3), 26-29.
Glynn, S., & Muth, K. D. (2008). Using drawing strategically. Science and Children , 45(9), 48-51.
Matsumura, L. C., Patthey-Chavez, G. G., Valdes, R., & Garnier, H. (2002). Teacher feedback, writing
assignment quality, and third-grade students’ revision in lower- and higher-achieving urban
schools. Elementary School Journal 103(1), 3–25.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Edition).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Science Teachers Association (2002). NSTA Position Statement: Elementary School Science.
National Science Teachers Association. Arlington: VA.
NRC, N. R. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRSC, N. S. (2011). (N. A. Science, Editor) Retrieved August 22, 2013, from http://www.nsrconline.org/
Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn science: Implications for practice and research. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching 31(9), 969–983.
Rowell, P. M. (1997). Learning in school science: The promises and practices of writing. Studies in
Science Education, 30(1), 19-56.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1985). Helping students become better writers. School Administrator
42(4), 16–26.
Shepardson, D. P., & Britsch, S. J. (2001). The role of children's journals in elementary school science
activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 43-69.
Tomkins, S. P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Looking for ideas: Observation, interpretation and
hypothesis-making by 12-year-old pupils undertaking science investigations. International Journal
of Science Education, 23(8), 791-813.
