Teacher variables as predictors of academic achievement of primary school pupils mathematics

Main Article Content

Adedeji Tella


This study examined the relationship between Teacher self- efficacy, interest, attitude, qualification,
experience and pupils’ academic achievement in primary school mathematics. The participants of the
study comprises of 254 primary school teachers and 120 primary school pupils. Data collected on the
study were analysed using a stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results reveals that teacher self –
efficacy and interest had significant correlation with pupils achievement scores. Teacher’s self-efficacy
being the best predictor of pupils’ academic achievement in mathematics was followed by teacher’s
interest. Attitude, qualification and experience were not significant correlation with pupil’s achievement
in mathematics. The study recommended that it is high time for primary school mathematics teachers to
have a change of attitude towards the teaching of the subject so that the achievement of universal basic
education will not be hindered. Furthermore, primary school educational authorities were called upon to
ensure that only teachers who are qualified to teach the subject are employed. Not these alone, their
attention was also drawn to the fact that they should design educational programmes that will enhance
the teacher self- efficacy for a better prediction of pupils’ achievement in mathematics.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
TELLA, Adedeji. Teacher variables as predictors of academic achievement of primary school pupils mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 16-33, july 2017. ISSN 1307-9298. Available at: <https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/4>. Date accessed: 06 aug. 2020.


Adams, P.E. & Krockover, G.H. (1997). Concerns and Perceptions of beginning
Secondary Science and Mathematics Teachers. Science Education 81(1), 29 –
Agyenmang, D.K. (1993). Sociology of Education for African Students.Temo: Ghana
Publishing Corporation.
Akpan, A.A (1987).Correlates of Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability among
Secondary School Students. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis University of Ibadan,
Ale, S.O (1989). School Mathematics in the 1990’s some Major Problems for
Developing Countries: International Journal of Mathematics Educational in
Science and Technology 20 (5), 655-659.
Alele- William G. (1988). Keynote Address Delivered at the Silver Jubilee meeting of
mathematics Association of Nigeria (MAN) Sept. 1982. Abacus 18 (1), 15-19.
Aminu, J. (1990). Address by the Honourable Minister of Education. Abacus 20 (1), 22-
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward Unifying Theory of Behavioural Change.
Psychological Review 84, 191 – 215.
Bobbitt, S.A., and McMillen, M.M. (1994). Qualifications of the Public School
Teacher Workforce: 1988 and 1991(NCES 95-665). U.S. Department of
Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office.
Brookover W, Beady C, Flood P, Schweitzer J & Wisenbaker J (1979) School social
systems and student achievement: schools can make a difference. New York:
Caraway, S. D. (1985). Factors influencing competency in mathematics among
entering elementary Education majors. Unpublished manuscript,
Universityof SouthAlabama. (ERIC Reproduction Service Document No.
Carpenter, T., & Lubinski, C. (1990).Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys
and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 21, 55-69.
Davies, N., & Savell, J. (2000). "Maths is like a bag of tomatoes": Student
attitudes upon entry to an Early Years teaching degree. Paper presented at the
Teacher Education Forum of Aotearoa New Zealand Conference, Christchurch.
Edwards A, and Knight P. (1974). Effective Early Years Education. Teaching Young
Children. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fajemidagba, O. (1999). Trends in Mathematics Education in Nigeria: Issues and
Problems Abacus 2 (1),, 19-27.
Ferguson, R.F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why
money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation 28, 465-498.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An
introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Goldhaber, D. D., and Anthony, E. (2004). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed?
The Urban Institute. Retrieved December12, 2006, from
Goldhaber, D. D., and Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High
school teacher certification status and student achievement. Education
Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22, 129-45.
Georgewill, J.W. (1980).Causes of poor achievement on WAEC Mathematical
Examination in River State. Secondary School Nigeria. International
Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 21 (3), 379-385.
Gibson and Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: Construct Validation. Journal of
Educational Psychology 76, 569 – 582.
Glathhorn Fox ; Slick ; Breliner & Biddle; Colton & Spark- Lager ; Costa ; Lampert
& Clark; Pultorak ; Porter & Brophy; Dwyer & Villegas in Stroot, S; Keil V;
Stedman , P; Lohr, L ; Faust, R; Schinn Cariol –Randall, L; Sullivan, A:
Czerniak, G; Kuchcinski, J; Orel N; & Richter, M; (1998). Peer Assistant and
Review Guidebook. Columbus; OH: Ohio Department of Education.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V., & Laine, R.D (1996).The effect of school resources on
student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361- 396.
Grootenboer, P. J. (2002). Affective development in mathematics: A case of two
pre- service primary school teachers. In B. Barton, K. Irwin, M.
Prankish, & M. Thomas (Eds.). Mathematics education in the South Pacific:
Proceedings of the Twenty- Fifth Annual Conference of the Mathematics
Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 318-325). Sydney:
Hanushek, E. (1990).The impact of differential expenditure on school performance.
Educational Research 14, (4), 20- 25.
Hawkins, E.F., Stancavage, F.B., & Dossey, J.A. (1998). School policies and practices
affecting instruction in mathematics. (NCES 98495). Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Hawk, P. P., Coble, C. R., & Swanson, M. (1985). Certification: It does matter. Journal
of Teacher Education 36 (3), 13-15.
Hone; Mechling, Stedmen; & Donnelley; Cunningham & Blacenship; Schoenberger,
Gusky, Smylie, Mitgelly et al and Gusky and Passaro in George Wenner.
(2001); Science and Mathematics Efficacy Beliefs Held by Practicing and
Prospective Teachers; A 5 – years Perspective. Journal of Science
Education and Technology 10 (2), 181-187. .
Ingersoll, R. (1996). Out-of-Field Teaching and Educational Equality (NCES 96–
040). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education
Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Ingersoll, R. (1999). The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary
Schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2): 26–37.
Ingersoll, R. (2000). Rejoinder: Misunderstanding the Problem of Out-of-Field
Teaching. Educational Researcher 30 (1), 21–22.
Kennedy (1990) & Raudenbush, Rowan & cheong (1992): Retrieved October 10,
2006, from http://deo,murdoch.edu.au/gem/iier/iiers/welch.htm
Kerlinger, F.N. (1985). Foundation of Behavioural Research. Rinehart Holt and
Mayer, D.P., Mullens, J.E., and Moore, M.T. (2000). Monitoring School Quality:
An Indicators Report (NCES 2001-030). U.S. Department of Education,
National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office.
McDonald T & Siegall M (1992).The effects of technological self-efficacy and job
focus on job performance, attitudes, and withdrawal behaviors. Journal of
Psychology,126, 465–475.
McMillen, M; Seastrom, K.J; Gruber, R.H.; McGrath, D.J.; &. Cohen, B.A.
(2000).Qualification of the public school teacher workforce: Prevalence of outof-
field teaching 1987-88-1999-2000. Education Statistics Quarterly. Retrieved
December 29, 2006 from
Mitchell, M. (1993).Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary
school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 3,
408- 422.
Midgely C, Feldlaufer H & Eccles JS (1989) Change in teacher efficacy and student
self-and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high
school. Journal of Educational Psychology l 81 ( 2), pp 247–258.
Monk, D. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science
teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education
National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (1996). What Matters Most:
Teaching for America's Future. Report of the National Commission on Teaching
& America's Future. Summary Report. New York: Author.
Neuschatz, M., and McFarling, M. (1999). Maintaining Momentum: High School
Physics for a New Millennium. College Park, MD: American Institute of
Physics. Retrieved December 29, 2006, from http//: www.aip.org/statistics
Robinson, V. (1985). Making Do in the Classroom: A Report on the Misassignment of
Teachers. Washington, DC: The Council for Basic Education.
Nisbet, S. (1991). A new instrument to measure pre-service primary teachers’
attitudes to teaching mathematics. Mathematics Education Research
Journal, 3, 34-56.
Odogwu, H.N (1994) Primary school Teachers and the Teaching of Time
Concept in Schools” Education Today 7, (21), 24-30.
Ohuche, R.O (1978). Recent attempts at Mathematics Curriculum Renewal in English
Speaking West Africa” Abacus 12, (1), 17-26.
Oshibodu, B.M (1984). An Investigation of Teacher’s Instrumental problems in
Mathematics. Benin Journal of Educational Studies. 11(3), 43-54.
Oshibodu, B.M. (1988). Mathematics at Primary level’. Abacus 18, (1) 13 – 20.
Rech, J., Hartzell, J, & Stephens, L. (1993). Comparisons of mathematical
competencies and attitudes of elementary education majors with established
norms of a general college population. School Science and Mathematics,93(3),
Relich, J., Way, J., & Martin, A. (1994) Attitudes to teaching mathematics: Further
development of a measurement instrument. Mathematics EducationResearch
Journal, 6 (1), 56-69.
Riggs, I. and Knochs, L. (1990).Towards the Development of an Elementary
Efficacy Belief Instrument. Science Education, 74, 625 – 637. Retrieved
December 29, 2006, from http://deo,murdoch.edu.au/gem/iier/iiers/welch.htm
Sanders, W. L. and J. C. Rivers (1996).Cumulative and residual effects of
teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University
of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
Skott, J. (2001). Emerging Practices of a Novice Teacher. Journal of Mathematics
Teacher Education, 4, (1), 3-28.
Southwell, B., & White, A.L.(2005).Attitude versus achievement in pre-service
Mathematics teacherEducation.Retrieved December 29, 2006, from:
Sullivan, P. (1989). The impact of a pre-service mathematics education on
beginning primary teachers. Research in Mathematics Education in Australia,
August, 1-9.
Swarzer, R., Schmitz, G.S. &. Daytner, G.T. (1999).The teacher self-efficacy scale.
Retrieved December 29, 2006, from http://www.fuberlin.
Tella, A.(1998). An Investigation into Poor Performance and Attitude of Secondary
School Students towards Mathematics in Oyo State, Nigeria. Unpublished B.Ed.
Project University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
Trentham L, Silvern S & Brogdon R (1985) Teacher efficacy and teacher
competency ratings. Psychology in the Schools, 22, (3), 343–349.
Wenglinsky, H. (2000). Teaching the teachers: Different settings, different results.
Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Wright, S. P., S. P. Horn, et al. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on
student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel
Evaluation in Education:11, 57-67