References
Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Applefield, J., Huber, R, & Moallem, M. (2001). Constructivism in theory and practice: Towards better understanding. The High School Journal, (Dec.-Jan.) 35-53.
Annetta, L., Mangrum, J., Holmes, S., Collazo, K., & Cheng, M. (2009). Bridging reality to virtual reality: Investigating gender effect and student engagement on learning through video game play in an elementary school classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1091-1113.
Author. (2013a).
Author. (2013b).
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (Y. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (2011). Science teachers learning through lesson analysis (STeLLA). Retrieved from https://bscs.org/stella.
Bleicher, R. E. (2006). Nurturing confidence in pre-service elementary science teachers.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 165–187.
Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (New York, Greenwood), 241-258.
Burguillo, J. C. (2010). Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Computers & Education, 55(2), 566-575.
Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner A., Scotter, P.V., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A. & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Retrieved from https://bscs.org/sites/default/files/_media/about/downloads/BSCS_5E_Full_Report.pdf
California Council on Science and Technology. (2007). Critical path analysis of California's science and mathematics teacher preparation system. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CDkQFjAD&url=http://www.cftl.org/documents/2007/TCPA.pdf&ei=UAw3Upa_K6PO2wXspYDACQ&usg=AFQjCNGFf0lAjpq-zcb5oVpsBdiUnWq69A&bvm=bv.52164340,d.b2I
Chapman and Hall.
Chen, C. & Tsai, Y. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory: Sage Publications, Inc.
Costley, C., Elliott, G., & Gibbs, P. (2010). Doing work based research: Approaches to enquiry for insider-researchers. London, English: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Crowther, D. T., & Bonnstetter, R. J. (1997), Science experiences and attitudes of elementary education majors as they experience Biology 295: A multiple case study and substantive theory. Proceedings of the annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 405220).
Dewey, J. (1997). How We Think. Dover Publications: Mineola NY.
diSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111-124.
Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54-63.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Comment on Blackler et al activity theory and the social construction of knowledge: a story of four umpires. Organization—The Interdisciplinary Journal of Organisation, Theory and Society Studies, 7(2), May 2000, 301–310.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54-71.
Freire, P. (2003). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Friedrichsen P. J., Abell S. K., Pareja E. M., Brown P. L., Lankford D. M., Volkmann M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357-383.
Gasson, S. (2004). Rigor in grounded theory research: An interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In M. E. Whitman & A. B. Woszczynski (Eds.), The handbook of information systems research (pp. 79–102). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Aldine Transaction.
Glaser, B.G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Greenfield, P.M. (1999). Historical change and cognitive change: A two-decade follow-up study in Zinacantan, a Maya community in Chiapas, Mexico. Mind, culture, and activity, 6(2), 92-108.
Guba, E.G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries, Educational Communication and Technology (29) 75–91.
Hadjiachilleos, S., Avraamidou, L., & Papastavrou, S. (2013). The use of Lego technologies in elementary teacher preparation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 614-629. DOI 10.1007/s10956-012-9418-4
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499-1509.
Hew, K. F. & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research Development, 55(3), 223-252.
Holland, D., W. Lachicotte, D. Skinner, and C. Cain. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Hughes, J. E. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.
Inman, C., Wright, V. H., & Hartman, J. A. (2011). Use of Second Life in K-12 and higher education: A review of research. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(3), 67-85.
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: MacArthur
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 385-410.
Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real”: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10, 163-174.
Kim, P., (2006). Effects of 3D virtual reality of plate tectonics on fifth grade students’ achievement and attitude toward science. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 25-34.
Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., Lewis, L., & Greene, B. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education programs for initial licensure: Statistical analysis report. (Master's thesis), Available from U.S. Department of Education. (NCES 2008-040). Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDoQFjAB&url=http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008040.pdf&ei=AQ83UrjfLoS22AX8wYHYCw&usg=AFQjCNFiLzihpzFPaDXUUk0dXf6JRhtewg&bvm=bv.52164340,d.b2I
Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) education: Background, federal policy and legislative action. CRS report for Congress. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33434.pdf
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. London: Cambridge University Press.
Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research. 77(4), 575-614.
Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12.
Marino, M., Israel, M., Beecher, C. C., & Basham, J. D. (2013). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of using video games to enhance science instruction. Journal of Science Education Technology, 22(5), 667-680. DOI 10.1007/s10956-012-9421-9
Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moersch, C. (1995). Level of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgments. Academy of Management Review, 24, 781–796.
National Academy of Sciences. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CEAQFjAD&url=http://www.csun.edu/science/ref/curriculum/reforms/nses/nses-complete.pdf&ei=oxE3UpWEBafF2AXi_oD4Cg&usg=AFQjCNF3hhWrH110sLjyTIubE8oFkwqi2Q&bvm=bv.52164340,d.b2I
National Academy of Sciences. (2010). Rising above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). 1983. A nation at risk: The importance of educational reform. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science and Technology Council. (2011). The federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education portfolio. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/nstc/committees/costem
National Science Board. (2006). America's pressing challenge: Building a stronger foundation. Available from National Science Foundation. (NSB0602). Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsb0602/nsb0602.pdf&ei=JhA3UpmxPKGA2AX-3YCoBw&usg=AFQjCNH-sqPs1bFIWBUmxNDiSBIVK-axYQ&bvm=bv.52164340,d.b2I
Newman, J. W., Abell, S. K., Hubbard, P. D., McDonald, J., Otaala, J., & Martini, M. (2004). Dilemmas of teaching inquiry in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 257-279.
Novak, E. & Wisdom, S. (2016, in press). Improving preservice elementary teachers’ science engagement through 3D printing technology. Journal of Immersive Education.
Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I., & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP): Reference manual (ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-3). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers. Measuring Reform Practices in Science and Mathematics Classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol. Retrieved from http://physicsed.buffalostate.edu/AZTEC/rtop/RTOP_full/PDF/RTOP_ref_man_IN003.pdf
Reed, J. and Procter, S. (eds) (1995) Practitioner research in health care:The inside story, London: Chapman and Hall.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwayer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
Shenton, A.K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.
Slotta, J. & M. Linn, M. (2009), WISE science: Web-based inquiry in the classroom NY: Teachers College Press.
Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76-84.
Sun, K., Lin, C., & Wang, S. (2010). A 3-D virtual reality model of the Sun and the Moon for e-learning at elementary schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 689-710.
Sung, H. & Hwang, G. (2013). A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43-51.
Toledo, C. (2005). A five-stage model of computer technology integration into teacher education curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 177-191.
Triangle Coalition for STEM Education (2017, March 26). Math and science education funding. Retrieved from www.trianglecoalition.org/president-calls-for-more-stem-teachers-grads.
U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee. (2012). STEM education: Preparing for the jobs of the future. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCsQFjAA&url=http://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?a=Files.Serve&File_id=6aaa7e1f-9586-47be-82e7-326f47658320&ei=TRE3UpCjNOTF2QWMs4D4CA&usg=AFQjCNGonTJ74BDEYSZ4kofuZK5faaMnPw&bvm=bv.52164340,d.b2I
Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4): Retrieved from http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/vealmak.html
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (1998) Utopistics, or Historical Choices of the Twenty First Century. New York, NY: New Press.
Wells G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education. In Lee C., Smagorinsky P. (Eds.) Vygotskyian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 51–85). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wu, H-K., Lee, S. W-Y., Chang, H-Y., Liang, J-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.
