References
Baker, L., & Brown, A. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In D. Pearson (Ed.),
Handbook of Reading Research. (ss. 353-394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc.
Begg, I. M., Martin, M. A., & Needham, D. R. (1992). Memory monitoring: How useful is
self-knowledge about memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 195-
218.
Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers.
TESOL Quarterly, 26, 319-343.
Casanave, C. (1988). Comprehension monitoring in ESL reading: A neglected essential.
TESOL Quarterly, 22, 283302.
Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child
Development, 53, 11-28.
Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J.,& Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not
relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 12,50-71.
Cromley, J. G. (2005). Metacognition, cognitive strategy instruction, and reading in adult
literacy. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 5, 187-204.
Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A.R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to
improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228-232.
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Why Does Rereading Improve Metacomprehension
Accuracy? Evaluating the Levels-of-Disruption Hypothesis for the Rereading Effect.
Discourse Processes, 40, 37-56.
Dunlosky, J.,& Connor, L. T. (1997). Age differences in the allocation of study time account
for age differences in memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 25,691-700
Epstein, W., Glenberg, A. M, & Bradley, M. (1984). Co-activation and comprehension:
Contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing. Memory & Cognition,12,
355-360.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive
developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of
Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(4), 702–718.
Glenberg, A.M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory
&Cognition, 15, 84-93.
Glenberg, A.M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (l987). Enhancing calibration of
comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. New York:
Longman.
Kimmel, S., & MacGinitie, W.H. (1984). Identifying children who use a perseverative text
processing strategy. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 162-172.
Kolic-Vehovec, S., & Bajsanski, I. (2006). Metacognitive strategies and reading
comprehension in elementary-school students. European Journal of Psychology of
Education, 21, 439-451.
Lin, L., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications
for education and instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345–391.
Lin, L., Moore, D., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2001). An assessment of students’ calibration of
comprehension and calibration of performance using multiple measures. Reading
Psychology, 22, 111–128.
Lin, L., Zabrucky, K. M., & Moore, D. (2002). Effects of text difficulty and adults’ age on
relative calibration of comprehension. American Journal of Psychology,15(2),187-
198.
Maki, R. H. (1995). Accuracy of metacomprehension judgments for questions of varying
importance levels. American Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 327-344.
Maki, R. H., Jonas, D., & Kallod, M. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and
metacomprehension ability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,1, 126–138.
Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don’t understand: A Preliminary investigation.
Child Development, 48, 989-992.
Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgements and control of study. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 18(3), 159-163.
Miesner, M. T., & Maki, R. H. (2007). The role of test anxiety in absolute and relative
metacomprehension accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 650–
670.
Morrison, L. (2004). Comprehension monitoring in first and second language reading. The
Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 77-106.
Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring
exercises and feedback on performance and monitoring accuracy. Metacognition and
Learning, 2, 159-179.
Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and
student performance in the classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 7-
28.
Nietfeld, J. L., Enders, C. K., & Schraw, G. (2006). A Monte Carlo comparison of two
measures of monitoring accuracy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66,
258-271.
Maki, R. H., J. M. Foley, W. K. Kajer, R. C. Thompson, & M.G. Willert. (1990). Increased
processing enhances calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 609-616.
Otero, J. C., Campanario, J.M., & Hopkins, K. D. (1992). The relationship between
academic achievement and metacognitive comprehension monitoring ability of Spanish secondary school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
52, pp 419-430.
Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration—An extended conceptualization and potential
applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 3-31.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and
assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41, 219-225.
Pressley M, & Schneider W. 1997. Introduction to Memory Development During Childhood
and Adolescence. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
Schraw, G. (2002). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.).
Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice. (ss. 3–
16). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review,
7, 351–371.
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive
monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
Thiede, K.W., & Dunlosky, J. (1994). Delaying students’ metacognitive monitoring improves
their accuracy in predicting the recognition performance. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 86, 290-302.
Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned
from multi-method designs? In: B. Moschner, C. Artelt (Eds.) Lernstrategien und
Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (75-97). Berlin: Waxmann.
Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (1995). Differential effects of instructional support on
learning in simulation environments. Instructional Science, 22,363-383.
Weaver, C. A. III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text
difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition,
23(1), 12–22.
Weaver, C. A. III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text
difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition,23,
12-22.
Wiley, J., Griffin, T., & Thiede, K.W. (2005). Putting the Comprehension in
Metacomprehension. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 408-428.
Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in
metacomprehension. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 408–428.
Zabrucky, K, Agler, L. & Moore, D. (2005). Metacognition in Taiwan: Students’ calibration
of comprehension and performance. International Journal of Psychology, 44 (4),
305-312.
Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1994). Contributions of working memory and evaluation and
regulation of understanding to adults’ recall of texts. Journal of Gerontology:
Psychological Sciences, 49, 201-212.
Zhao, Q., & Linderholm, T. (2008). Adult metacomprehension: Judgment processes and
accuracy constraints. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 191–206.
