References
Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary
teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of
Science Education, 16(4), 475-487.
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J. & Taylor, P. C. (2000). Constructivist learning
environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia.
International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 37-55.
Alonzo, A. C. (2002). Evaluation of a model for supporting the development of
elementary school teachers’ science content knowledge. Proceedings of the
Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of
Teachers in Science. Charlotte, NC.
Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on
beginning teachers' practices. International Journal of Science Education,
21(2), 155-168.
Aron, R. H., Francek, M. A., Nelson, B. D., & Bisard, W. J. (1994). Atmospheric
misconceptions: How they cloud our judgment. The Science Teacher, 61(1),
31–33.
Asoko, H. (2002). Developing conceptual understanding in primary science.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 153-164.
Atwood, R. K., & Atwood, V.A. (1997). Effects of instruction on preservice
elementary teachers’ conceptions of the causes of night and day and the
seasons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(1), 1-13.
Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Towards
more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521-539.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain,
mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Butts, D.P., Koballa, T.R., & Elliot, T. D. (1997). Does participating in an
undergraduate elementary science methods course make a difference?
Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9(2), 1-17.
Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some
misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 161-199.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge
acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science
instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional technology.
(Technical Report No. 6899). BBN Labs Inc., Cambridge, MA.
DiSessa, A. A. (2002). Why conceptual ecology is a good idea. In M. Limon & L.
Mason (Eds.). Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and
practice (pp. 29-60). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Driver, R. (1995). Constructivist approaches in science teaching. In L. P. Steffe &
J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 385-400). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing
scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
Fulp, S. L. (2002). Status of elementary school science teaching. 2000 national
survey of science and mathematics education. Retrieved from
http://www.Horizon-research.com
Galili, I., Bendall, S., & Goldberg, F. (1993). The effects of prior knowledge and
instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching 30(3), 271-301.
Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R., & Fensham, P. (1982). Children’s science and its
consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
Glasson, G.E., & Teates, T. G. (1989, March 30-April 1). The relationships among
alternative physical science conception, formal reasoning ability, and
science background of pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the annual
meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San
Francisco, CA.
Gorsky, P., & Finegold, M. (1992). Using computer simulations to restructure
students' conceptions of force. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and
Science Education, 11, 163-178.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American
Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D.
C.
Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46).
New York: Macmillan.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended? A
cognitive-sociocultural view. In G.M. Sinatra & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.),
Intentional conceptual change (pp. 407-427). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change.
International Journal of Science Education, 11, 541-553.
Heywood, D. S. (2007). Problematizing science subject matter knowledge as a
legitimate enterprise in primary teacher education. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 37(4), 519-542.
Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Educational reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 249-263.
Lane, C. L., & French, D. (1994, January). Encouraging reflection in preservice
teachers through comparing student preconceptions with their own. Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of
Teachers in Science, El Paso, TX.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral
participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing
Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Martin, D. J. (2006). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach (4th
ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Understanding conceptual change: A commentary. In M.
Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory
and practice" (pp. 101-111). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., & Miller, S. P. (1994). Implications of constructivism for
teaching math to students with moderate disabilities. The Journal of
Special Education, 28 (3), 290-306.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education
standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Nussbaum, J., & Novick, N. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict,
and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional
Science, 11, 183-200.
Piaget, J. (1978). Success and understanding. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Posnanski, T. J. (2002). Professional development programs for elementary science
teachers: An analysis of teacher self-efficacy beliefs and a professional
development model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 189-220.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982).
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual
change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211-227.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social
context. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235--276.
Roth, K. & Garnier, H. (2007). What science teaching looks like: An international
perspective. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 16-23
Schell, J., & Black, R. Situated learning: An inductive case study of a collaborative
learning experience. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 34 (4). 5-28.
Schneps, M. H. ( Project Director). (1988). A private universe [Videotape].
Available from Pyramid Film and Video, 2801 Colorado Avenue, Santa
Monica, CA 90404.
Schoon, K. J. (1995). The origin and extent of alternative conceptions in the earth
and space sciences: A survey of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of
Elementary Science Education, 7(2), 27–46.
Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of
science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5): 553-
568.
Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Teaching science to every child: Using
culture a starting point. New York: Routledge.
Smith, D. C. & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in
primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1-20.
Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science
Education, 23, 1-19.
Stevens, C. & Wenner, G. (1996). Elementary preservice teachers' knowledge and
beliefs regarding science and mathematics. School Science and
Mathematics, 96, 2-9.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional
strategies for science teaching. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research
on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York: Macmillan
Publishing Company.
Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and
learning. In K. Tobin (Ed) The Practice of Constructivism in Science
Education (pp 3-21). Lawrence-Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice elementary
teachers' conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 633–658.
Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2007). A longitudinal study of
conceptual change: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of moon
phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (2), 303-326
Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naive physics. In M. Limon & L. Mason
(Eds.).Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp.
61-76). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50,
47-54.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman
(Eds.), Mind in Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994) Research on alternative
conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.) Handbook on Research in
Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillian
Webb, N. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in
small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz and N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in
cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning 102-119.
University Press, Cambridge.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (2000). Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to
making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee
(Eds.), Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science (pp. 331-
370). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of
Science.
