References
Afflerbach, P. (2000). Verbal Reports and Protocol Analysis. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson
& R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (vol. 3, pp. 163-179). Mahwah, New Jersey,
London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Afflerbach, P. & Johnston, P. (1984). Research methodology: On the use of verbal reports in reading
research. Journal of Reading Behaviour 16 (307-322).
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allan, A. I. C. G. (1992). EFL reading comprehension test validation: investigating aspects of process
approaches. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
Andreassen, R. & Bråten, I. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different
multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading 33 (263-283).
Campbell, J.R. (2005). Single Instruments, Multiple Measures: Considering the Use of Multiple Item
Formats to Assess Reading Comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s Reading
Comprehension and Assessment (pp. 347–369). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum
Associates.
Cordon, L. A. & Day, J. D. (1996). Strategy use on standardized reading comprehension tests. Journal of
Educational Psychology 88 (288–295).
Ericsson, K. & Simon, K. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press.
Farr, R., Pritchard, R. & Smitten, B. (1990). A Description of What Happens When an Examinee Takes a
Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Test. Journal of Educational Measurement 27 (209–
226).
Goetz, E.T., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E. & Radin, D. J. (1983). Reading in perspective: What real cops
and pretend burglars look for in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (500–510).
Hannus, M. & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilizations of Illustrations during Learning of Science Textbook
Passages Among Low- and High-Ability Children. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2 (95–
123).
Holmqvist, K., Holmberg, N., Holsanova, J., Tärning, J. & Engwall, B. (2006). Reading Information
Graphics – Eyetracking Studies with Experimental Conditions. In J. Errea (Ed.), Malofiej
Yearbook of Infographics (pp. 54–61). Society for News Design (SND-E), Navarra University,
Pamplona, Spain.
Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N. & Holmqvist, K. (2005). Tracing Integration of Text and Pictures in
Newspaper Reading. Lund University Cognitive Studies 125. Lund: Lund University.
Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F. J., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual Differences in Reading to Summarize
Expository Text: Evidence from Eye Fixation Patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology 94
(44–55).
Høien, T. & Tønnesen, G. (1998). Håndbok til Ordkjedetesten [Handbook for the word-chain test].
Stavanger: Stiftelsen Dysleksiforskning.
Johansen, E. B. & Steineger, E. (1999). Globus: Natur og miljøfag 7 [Globus: 7th year science and
environment studies’]. Oslo: J.W. Cappelen Forlag.
Johnson, D. & Kress, G. (2003). Globalisation, Literacy and Society: redesigning pedagogy and
assessment. Assessment in Education 10 (5-14).
Johnston, P. J. (1984). Assessment in Reading. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil and P. Mosenthal (Eds.),
Handbook of Reading Research (2nd ed., pp. 147–182). New York: Longman.
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading. From eye fixations to comprehension.
Psychological Review 87 (329-354).
Kaakinen, J.K. & Hyönä, J. (2005). Perspective Effects on Expository Text Comprehension: Evidence
from Think-Aloud Protocols, Eyetracking and Recall. Discourse Process 40 (239–257).
Kamil, M. L. (2004). The current state of quantitative research. Reading Research Quarterly 39 (100-107).
Kress, G. & van Leuven, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary
communication. London: Arnold.
Land, M. & Tatler, B. (2009). Looking and Acting. Vision and Eye Movements in Natural Behaviour. Oxford,
New York: Oxford University Press.
Langer, J. (1987). The construction of meaning and the assessment of comprehension: An analysis of
reader performance on standardized test items. In R. O. Freedle & R. P. Duran (Eds.), Cognitive
and linguistic analyses of text performance (pp. 225-244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Li, W. (1992). What is a test testing? An investigation of the agreement between students´ test taking
processes and test constructers´ presumptions. Unpublished MA thesis, Lancaster University,
Lancaster.
Messick, S. (1988). The Once and Future Issues of Validity: Assessing the Meaning and Consequences
of Measurement. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test Validity (pp. 33–46). Hillsdale, New
Jersey, Hove, London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences From Persons’
Responses and Performance as Scientific Inquiry Into Score Meaning. American Psychologist
50 (741–7499.
Mullis, I. V. S., Kennedy, A. M., Martin, M. O. & Sainsbury, M. (2006). PIRLS 2006 Assessment Framework
and Specifications. (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Ozuru, Y., Best, R., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A. & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Influence of Question Format and
Text Availability on the Assessment of Expository Text Comprehension. Cognition and
Instruction 25 (399-438).
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the
comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction 19 (228-242).
Paulson, E.J. & Henry, J. (2002). Does the Degrees of Reading Power Assessment Reflect the Reading
Process? An Eye-Movement Examination. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 46 (234–244).
Pearson, P. D. & Hamm, D. N. (2005). The Assessment of Reading Comprehension: A Review of
Practices – Past, Present and Future. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s Reading
Comprehension and Assessment (pp. 13–69). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Raven, J.C. (1958). Standard Progressive Matrices: Sets A, B, C, D & E. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists
Press Ltd.
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. & Raven, J. (1988). Standard Progressive Matrices: 1988 Edition. London, UK:
Oxford Psychologists Press Ltd.
Rayner, K. (1992). Eye Movements and visual cognition: Scene perception during reading. New York:
Springer-Verlag.
Rayner, K. (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.
Psychological Bulletin 124 (372–422).
Rothkopf, E. Z. & Billington, M. J. (1979). Goal-guided learning from text: Inferring a descriptive
processing model from inspection times and eye movements. Journal of Educational
Psychology 71 (310–327).
Salmerón, L., Vidal-Abarca, E., Mana, A., Martínez, T., Gil, L. & Naumann, J. (submitted). Reading
Strategies in task oriented reading: The case of PISA-like tasks. Manuscript submitted for
publication.
Solheim, O. J. (2011). The Impact of Reading Self-Efficacy and Task Value on Reading Comprehension
Scores in Different Item Formats. Reading Psychology 32 (1-27).
Solheim, O. J. & Skaftun, A. (2009). The problem of semantic openness and constructed response.
Assessment in Education 16 (149-164).
Tai, R. H., Loehr, J. F. & Brigham, F. J. (2006). An exploration of the use of eye-gaze tracking to study
problem-solving on standardized science assessments. International Journal of Research &
Method in Education 29 (185–208).
Valencia, S. W. & Pearson, P. D. (1987). Reading Assessment: Time for a change. The Reading Teacher 40
(726–732).
Vidal-Abarca, E., Mãná, A. & Gil, L. (2010). Individual Differences for Self-Regulating Task-Oriented
Reading Activities. Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (817-826).
