References
Adlof, S.M., Catts, H.W., & Little, T. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency
component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933-958.
Bereiter, C. & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading
comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131-156.
Cain, K. & Oakhill, J.V. (1999). Inference making and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and
Writing, 11, 489-503.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P.E. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability:
Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 96, 31-42.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K., (2005). The relation between children's reading comprehension level
and their comprehension of idioms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 65-87.
Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J.B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading
disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331-
361.
Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self- explanations improves
understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
Chiesi, H.L., Spilich, G.J., & Voss, J.F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to
high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 257-273.
Cook, A.E., Limber, J.E., & O'Brien, E.J. (2001). Situation-based context and the availability of predictive
inferences. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 220-234.
Cornoldi, C. & Oakhill, J.V. (Eds.). (1996). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and
remediation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Inc.
Cutting, L.E. & Scarborough, H.S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions
of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how
comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 227-299.
Dewitz, P., Carr, E., & Patberg, J. (1987). Effects of interference training on comprehension and
comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 99-121.
Dixon, P. & Bortolussi, M. (1996). Literary communication: Effects of reader-narrator cooperation.
Poetics, 23, 405-430.
Einstein, G.O., McDaniel, M.A., Owen, P.D., & Coté, N.C. (1990). Encoding and recall of texts: The
importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 566-581.
Fletcher, J.M. (2006). Measuring reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 323-330.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Instruction on mathematical problem solving. In D. Berch & M.
Mazzacco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical
learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 397-414). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making
classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
Garnham, A., Oakhill, J.V., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1982). Referential continuity and the coherence of
discourse. Cognition, 11, 29-46.
Givón, T. (1995). Coherence in text vs. coherence in mind. In M.A. Gernsbacher & T.
Givón (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (pp. 59–115). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Gough, P.B., Hoover, W.A., & Peterson, C.L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C.
Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 1-13). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Gough, P.B. & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disabilities. Remedial and Special
Education, 7, 6-10.
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., & Louwerse, M.M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to
process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A.P. Sweet & C.E. Snow (Eds.),
Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82-98). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text
comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
Guthrie, J.T. & Alao, S. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational
Psychologist, 32, 95-105.
Haenggi, D. & Perfetti, C.A. (1994). Processing components of college level reading comprehension.
Discourse Processes, 17, 83-104.
Hansen, J. & Pearson, P.D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of
fourth grade good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821-829.
Keenan, J. M. (in press). Measure for measure: Challenges in assessing reading comprehension. In J.
Sabatini & E. Albro (Eds.), Assessing reading in the 21st century: Aligning and applying advances
in the reading and measurement sciences.
Keenan, J.M. & Betjemann, R.S. (2006). Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test without reading it:
Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent items. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 10, 363-380.
Keenan, J.M., Betjemann, R.S., & Olson, R.K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they
assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 12, 281-300.
Kendeou, P., Lynch, J.S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., White, M., & Kremer, K.E. (2005). Developing
successful readers: Building early narrative comprehension skills through television viewing
and listening. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 91-98.
Kendeou, P. & Papadopoulos, T.C. (2008, November). Cognitive profiles of struggling readers: A theorybased
approach to reading disabilities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.
Kendeou, P. & Papadopoulos, T.C. (in press). The use of CBM-Maze in Greek: A closer look at what it
measures. In C. Espin, K. McMaster, & S. Rose (Eds.), The progress monitoring paradigm:
Research, policy, and practice.
Kendeou, P., Savage, R., & van den Broek, P. (2009). Revisiting the simple view of reading. British Journal
of Educational Psychology, 79, 353-370.
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M.J., & Lynch, J.S. (2007). Preschool and early elementary
comprehension: Skill development and strategy interventions. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.),
Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, (pp. 27-45).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M.J., & Lynch, J.S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in
early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765-778.
King, A. (2007). Beyond literal comprehension: A strategy to promote deep understanding of text. In
D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and
technologies (pp. 267-290). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction- integration
model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University
Press.
Kintsch, W. & van dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Kucan, L. & Beck, I.L. (1997). “Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction,
and social Interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67, 271-299.
Long, D.L., Oppy, B.J., & Seely, M.R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential
processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1456-
1470.
Lonigan, C.J., Burgess, S.R., & Anthony, J.L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading
skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental
Psychology, 36, 596-613.
Magliano, J.P. & Millis, K.K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure. Cognition and
Instruction, 21, 251-283.Magliano, J.P., Millis, K.K.,
Magliano, J.P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Millis, K.K., Muñoz, B.D., & McNamara, D.S. (2002). Using latent
semantic analysis to assess reader strategies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &
Computers, 34, 181-188.
Mannes, S.M. & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and
Instruction, 4, 91-115.
Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge.
McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inferences during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
McNamara, D.S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text
sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62.
McNamara, D.S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38, 1-30.
McNamara, D.S. (2007). IIS: A marriage of computational linguistics, psychology, and educational
technologies. In D. Wilson & G. Sutcliffe (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth International Florida
Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 15-20). Menlo Park, California: The AAAI
Press.
McNamara, D.S., Boonthum, C., Levinstein, I.B., & Millis, K. (2007). Evaluating self-explanations in
iSTART: Comparing word-based and LSA algorithms. In T. Landauer, D.S. McNamara, S.
Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis (pp. 227-241). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better?
Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in
learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
McNamara, D.S. & Magliano, J.P. (2009). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross
(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297-384). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M.J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary and
grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal
study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665-681.
Nation, K. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The
science of reading: A handbook (pp 248-265). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Oakhill, J. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children’s comprehension of stories. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 54, 31–39.
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Bryant, P.E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension:
evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443-468.
Oahill, J. & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and
remediation. In C. Cornaldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and
intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Oakhill, J., Yuill, N. & Donaldson, M. (1990). Understanding of "because" in skilled and less-skilled text
comprehenders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 401-410.
O’Brien, E.J. & Myers, J.L. (1985). When comprehension difficulty improves memory for text. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11, 12-21.
O'Brien, E.J. & Myers, J.L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S.R. Goldman,
A.C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence:
Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 35-54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Reilly, T. & McNamara, D.S. (2002). What’s a science student to do? In W.D. Gray & C.D. Schunn (Eds.),
Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 726–
731). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
O’Reilly, T., Best, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2004). Self-explanation reading training: Effect for lowknowledge
readers. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1053–1058). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007a). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better
for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43, 121-152.
O'Reilly, T. & McNamara, D.S. (2007b). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading
strategy knowledge on more traditional “High-Stakes” measures of high school students’
science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 161-196.
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D.S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in
the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228-242.
Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). A multidimensional framework to evaluate reading assessment
tools. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and
technologies (pp. 107-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ozuru, Y., Rowe, M., O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D.S. (2008). Where's the difficulty in standardized reading
tests: The passage or the question? Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1001-1015.
Palincsar, A.S. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and
comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
Paris, S.G. (2007). Assessment of reading comprehension. Encyclopedia of language an literacy
development (pp. 1-8). London, ON: Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network.
Paris, S.G., Cross, D.R., & Lipson, M.Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve
children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
Paris, S.G., Lindauer, B.K., & Cox, G.L. (1977). The development of inferential comprehension. Child
Development, 47, 1728-1733.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York, NY:
Guilford.
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B.
Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 545-
561). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development
program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Rapp, D.N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K.L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C.A. (2007). Higher-order
comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289-312.
Rauenbusch, F. & Bereiter, C. (1991). Making reading more difficult: A degraded text microworld for
teaching reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 181-206.
Savage, R. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and
linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific
Studies of Reading, 10, 143-164.
Shanahan, R., Kamil, M.L., & Tobin, A.W. (1982). Cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension.
Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 229-55.
Singer, M. & Ritchot, K.F.M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text
inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733-743.
Spooner, A., Baddeley, A.D., & Gathercole, S.E. (2004). Can reading accuracy and comprehension be
separated in the Neale Analysis of reading ability? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74,
187-204.
Snowling, M.J. & Hulme, C. (2005) Learning to read with a language impairment. In M.J. Snowling & C.
Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 397-412). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Publishing.
Stanovich, K.E. & Cunningham, A.E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations
between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85,
211-229.
Storch, S.A. & Whitehurst, G.J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence
from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934-947.
Stothard, S.E. & Hulme, C. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children: The role of language
comprehension and working memory skills. Reading and Writing, 4, 245-256.
Trabasso, T. & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through online
inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
van den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference
generation in text comprehension. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d’ Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),
Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423-445). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van den Broek, P. & Kremer, K.E. (1999). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during
reading. In B. Taylor, M. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning (pp. 1-31). New
York: Teacher's College Press.
van den Broek, P., Rapp, D.N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist
processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299-316.
van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & White, M. J. (2009). Cognitive processes during reading: Implications
for the use of multimedia to foster reading comprehension. In A. G. Bus & S. B. Neuman (Eds.),
Multimedia and literacy development: Improving achievement for young learners (pp. 57-73).
New York: Rutledge.
Whitney, P., Ritchie, B., & Clark, M. (1991). Working memory capacity and the use of elaborative
inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 14, 133–145.
Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled
comprehenders. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 173–186.
