References
Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don't understand? Standards for evaluating
comprehension. In D. L. Forrest, G. E., MacKinnnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition,
cognition, and human performance (pp 155-205). New York: Academic Press.
Best, R. M., Flyod, R. G., & McNamara, D. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children's
comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29, 137-164.
Best, R., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: the
role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 65-83.
Calhoon, M. (2005). Effects of peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program
on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of
Learning Disabilities, 38, 424-433.
Carnine, L., & Carnine, D. (2004). The interaction of reading skills and science content knowledge when
teaching struggling secondary students. Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 20, 203-218.
Caverly, D., Mandeville, T., & Nicholson, S. (1995). PLAN: A study-reading strategy for informational
text. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39, 190-199.
Chambliss, M. & Calfee, R. (1989). Designing science textbooks to enhance student understanding.
Educational Psychologist, 24, 307-322.
Cook, L. & Mayer, R. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 80, 448-456.
Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion.
The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 262-273.
Graesser, A., McNamara, D., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through
point & query, autotutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225-234.
Graesser, A., Jeon, M., Dufty, D. (2008). Agent technologies designed to facilitate interactive
knowledge construction. Discourse Processes, 45, 298-322.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Kroeger, S., Burton, C., & Preston, C. (2009). Integrating evidence-based practices in Middle science
reading. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 41, 6-15.
Magliano, J., Todaro, S., Millis, K., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Kim, H., & McNamara, D. (2005). Changes in
reading strategies as a function of reading training: a comparison of live and computerized
training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 185-208.
McMaster, K., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (2006). Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise
and limitations of peer-mediated instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 5-25.
McNamara, D., O’Reilly, T., Best, R., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students’ reading
comprehension with iSTART. Educational Computing
Research, 31, 147-171.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010, March 12) The Nation’s Report Card: The NAEP Reading
Achievement Levels by Grade. Retrieved June 25, 2010, from
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/achieveall.asp
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002, June 19) The Nation’s Report Card: The NAEP Science
Achievement Levels. Retrieved June 25, 2010, from
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/science/achieveall.asp
Radcliff, R., Caverly, D., Hand, J., & Franke, D. (2008). Improving reading in a middle school science
classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51, 398-408.
Radcliff, R., Caverly, D., Peterson, C., & Emmons, M. (2004). Improving textbook reading in a middle
school science classroom. Reading Improvement, 41, 145-156.
Rogevich, M., & Perin, D. (2008). Effects on science summarization of a reading comprehension
intervention for adolescents with behavior and attention disorders.
Exceptional Children, 74, 135-154.
Zimmerman, C., Gerson, S., Monroe, A., & Kearney, A. M. (2007). Physics is harder than psychology (or is
it?): Developmental differences in calibration of domain-specific texts. In D. S. McNamara & J.
G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1683 –
1688). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/ csjarchive/
proceedings /2007/docs/p1683.pdf
