References
Abramson, G. (2006, May). Has the gender gap closed?: Yes. Learning and Leading with Technology, 33,
6-7. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.iste.org/Content/
NavigationMenu/Publications/LL/LLIssues/Volume_33_2006_2005_/ May_No_8_/33806a.pdf
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (1992). How schools shortchange
girls: A study of major findings on girls and education. Washington, DC: Author and National
Education Association.
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (2000). Tech-savvy: Educating girls
in the new computer age. Washington, DC: Author.
Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research
process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1993). Research in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Best, R. (1983). We've all got scars: What boys and girls learn in elementary school. Bloomington: Indiana
University.
Bogo, M., Sussman, T., & Globerman, J. (2004). The field instructor as a group worker: Managing trust
and competition in group supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(1), 13-26.
Bravo, M. J. (2003). A psychosocial/educational intervention for decreasing gender stereotypes in
technology (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts
International, 64 (12), 4352. (UMI No. AAT 3116265)
Brown, J., & Sheppard, B. (1997). Professional development: What do we know and where are we going?
Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://www.mun.ca/educ/ faculty/mwatch/win97/pdfinal.htm
Brusca, F., & Canada, K. (1992). The technological gender gap: Evidence and recommendations for
educators and computer-based instruction designers [Electronic version]. Educational Technology
Research & Development, 39(2), 43-51.
Campbell, P. B., & Sanders, J. S. (1997). Uninformed but interested: Findings of the national survey on
gender equity in preservice education. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(1), 69-75. Retrieved Jun 5,
2006, from http://jte.sagepub.com/ content/vol48/issue1/
Carr-Hill, R., & Chambers-Dixon, P. (2002). A review of methods for monitoring and measuring social
inequality, deprivation, and health inequality. Retrieved July 27, 2006, from
http://www.ihs.ox.ac.uk/sepho/publications/carrhill/
Chapman, A. (2002). Gender bias in education. Retrieved November 17, 2004, from
http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/genderbias.html
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Overall, T. (2005). Transition points for the gender gap in computer
enjoyment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 23-37. Retrieved July 10, 2006,
from http://www.iste.org/Content/ NavigationMenu/ Publications/ JRTE/ Issues/ Volume_38/
Number_1_Fall_2005/ Number_1_Fall_2005.htm
Christie, A. A. (1997). Using email within a classroom based on feminist pedagogy [Electronic version].
Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 146-176.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd
ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Cuban, L. (2001). Teachers' infrequent computer use in classrooms. In J. Woodward & L. Cuban (Eds.),
Technology, curriculum and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students
with disabilities (pp. 121-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Delp, D. J. (2002). The effect of professional development training for secondary mathematics teachers
concerning nontraditional employment roles for females (Doctoral dissertation, University of North
Texas, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (09), 3137. (UMI No. AAT 3065687)
Dooling, J. O. (1999). A study of gender differences in beliefs toward computer technology and factors
which influence these beliefs in Grades 4, 5, 6, and 7 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hartford,
1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (06), 430. (UMI No. AAT 9936826)
Ferguson-Pabst, D., Persichitte, K., Lohr, L., & Pearman, B. (2003). An analysis of the influence of gender,
grade level, and teacher on the selection of mathematics software by intermediate students.
Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 5-27.
Fey, M. H. (n.d.). Gender and technology: A question of empowerment. Retrieved May 23, 2004, from
http://www.geneseo.edu/~balajthy/RWQ/rwq12.htm
Freeman, H., Mokros, J., Parkes, A., Perez, C., & Rubin, A. (2000). Weaving gender equity into math reform.
Retrieved March 20, 2005, from http://www.terc.edu/ wge/techsession.html
Fullan, M. (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16-20.
Fullan, M., Bertani, A., & Quinn, J. (2004). New lessons for district-wide reform. Educational Leadership,
61(7), 42-46.
Gall, J. P., Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains,
NY: Longman.
Gipps, C., McCallum, B., & Hargreaves, E. (2000). What makes a good primary school teacher: Expert
classroom strategies. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (1995). Supervision of instruction: A developmental
approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
GrayMill. (1997). GrayMill, GESA, equity. Retrieved March 16, 2005, from http://www.graymill.com/
Gunn, C., McSporran, M., MacLeod, H. & French, S. (2003). Dominant or different?: Gender issues in
computer supported learning [Electronic version]. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1).
Gurian, M. (1996). The wonder of boys. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
Gurian, M., & Henley, P. (2001). Boys and girls learn differently. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for
learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers.
Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 48-63.
Hometown Locator. (2005). Census details. Retrieved April 4, 2005, from
http://www.hometownlocator.com
Honey, M., Moeller, B., Brunner, C., Bennett, D., Clements, P., & Hawkins, J. (1991). Girls and design:
Exploring the questions of technological imagination. In E. Rassen & L. Iura (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass
reader on gender in education (pp. 329-344). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Inkpen, K. (1997). Three important research agendas for educational multimedia: Learning, children, and
gender. Retrieved June 26, 2006, from http://www.edgelab.ca/publications/edmedia97.pdf
Johns Hopkins Medical Institute. (2000). Hopkins research shows nature, not nurture, determines gender.
Retrieved April 14, 2004, from http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/press/2000/MAY/000512.HTM
Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (1999). Thorns among roses: The struggle of young boys in early
education. In E. Rassen & L. Iura (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass reader on gender in education (pp. 153-181).
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Levin, B. B., & Barry, S. M. (1997). Children's views of technology: The role of age, gender, and school
setting. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8, 267-290.
Lewis, T. (1999). Research in technology education: Some areas of need [Electronic version]. Journal of
Technology Education, 10(2), 41-56.
Lindsay, G., & Dockrell, J. E. (2004). Whose job is it?: Parents' concerns about the needs of their children
with language problems. Journal of Special Education, 37(4), 225-235.
Locke, F. L., Spirduso, W. W., & Silverman, S. J. (1987). Proposals that work: A guide for planning
dissertations and grant proposals. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lundeberg, M. A. (1997). You guys are overreacting: Teaching prospective teachers about subtle
gender bias. Journal of Teacher Education, 48, 55-61.
Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2005). Motivating boys and motivating girls: Does teacher gender really make a
difference? Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 320-324. Retrieved January 22, 2005, from
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/ coms2/summary_0286-11961821_ITM
Matthews, C. E., Binkley, W., Crisp, A., & Gregg, K. (1998). Challenging gender bias in fifth grade.
Educational Leadership, 55(4), 54-57.
McGrath, D. (2004). Closing the gender gap: Girls, technology, fluency, and PBL. Learning and Leading
with Technology, 31(6), 28-31.
McTaggart, R. (1989). The 16 tenets of participatory action research. Retrieved March 8, 2005, from
http://www.caledonia.org.uk/par.htm
National Coalition for Equity in Education. (n.d.). National coalition for equity in education. Santa
Barbara: University of California, Department of Education.
National Organization for Women. (1995). Concepts and definition of terms used to construct the
constitutional equality amendment. Retrieved November 28, 2004, from
http://www.now.org/issues/economic/cea/concept.html
Owens, S. L., Smothers, B. C., & Love, F. E. (2003). Are girls victims of gender bias in our nation's
schools? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30, 131-136.
Perez, C. (2001). Weaving gender equity into math reform: Equity resource guide. Cambridge, MA:
Education Research Collaborative/Technical Education Research Centers.
Pollack, W. (1998). Real boys: The truth behind the myths. In E. Rassen & L. Iura (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass
reader on gender in education (pp. 88-100). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rasmussen, C. (1995). Critical issue: Ensuring equity and excellence in mathematics. Oak Brook, IL: North
Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved March 27, 2005, from
http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/math/ ma100.htm
Rice, M. (1995). Issues surrounding the integration of technology into the K-12 classroom: Notes from
the field [Electronic version]. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the
21st Century, 3(1), 67-81.
Rubin, A. (2000). Weaving gender equity: Technology, math, and equity session. Retrieved December 25,
2004, from http://www.terc.edu/wge
Sadker, D. (1996). Where the girls are? Retrieved March 15, 2005, from
http://www.sadker.org/wherethegirlsare.htm
Sadker, D. (1999). Gender equity: Still knocking at the classroom door. Educational Leadership, 56(7),
22-26.
Sadker, D. (2001). What is title IX? Retrieved March 15, 2005, from
http://www.american.edu/sadker/titleix.htm
Sadker, D., & Sadker, M. (1994a). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York:
Macmillan.
Sadker, D., & Sadker, M. (1994b). The miseducation of boys. In E. Rassen & L. Iura (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass
reader on gender in education (pp. 182-203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sanders, J. (1997). Teacher education and gender equity (Report No. RR93002015). Washington, DC: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED408277)
Sanders, J. (2002a). Fairness at the source. Retrieved April 1, 2004, from
http://www.josanders.com/pdf/Fairness_122702.pdf
Sanders, J. (2002b). Something is missing from teacher education: Attention to two genders. Phi Delta
Kappan, 84, 241-244.
Sanders, J. (2003a). Teaching gender equity in teacher education. Education Digest, 68(5), 25-29.
Sanders, J. (2003b). Guidelines for a gender equity workshop. Retrieved December 22, 2005, from
http://www.josanders.com/pdf/GE%20workshop.pdf
Sanders, J. (2003c). Resources. Retrieved January 30, 2005, from
http://www.josanders.com/resources.html
Sanders, J. (2005, June). Gender and technology in education: What the research tells us. Proceedings
from the International Symposium on Women and ICT: Creating Global Transformation, Baltimore.
Sanders, J., & Campbell, P. B. (2001). Using mentors and interdisciplinary teams to genderize teacher
education [Electronic version]. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4), 301-
313.
Sanders, J., Koch, J., & Urso, J. (1997). Equity right from the start: Instructional activities for teacher
educators in mathematics, science, and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sanders, J., & Tescione, S. M. (2002). Gender equity and technology. In J. Koch & B. Irby (Eds.), Defining
and redefining gender equity in education (pp. 99-115). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
SchoolKiT International. (2004, July). Viewing professional development as change management.
Retrieved February 27, 2005, from http://www.schoolkit.com/
Newsletters/NL_US_04_07/NL_US_04_07.htm
Shapiro, J., Kramer, S., & Hunerberg, C. (1981). Equal their chances: Children's activities for non-sexist
learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Siann, G., MacLeod, H., Glissov, P., & Durndell, A. (1990). The effect of computer use on gender
differences in attitude to computers. Computers and Education, 14(2), 184-191.
Sprinthall, N. A., Sprinthall, R. C., & Oja, S. N. (1994). Educational psychology: A developmental approach
(6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Starr, L. (2000). Is technology just for boys? Retrieved March 23, 2004, from
http://www.educationworld.com/a_issues/chat/chat017.shtml
Stephenson, C. (2006). Has the gender gap closed?: No. Learning and Leading with Technology, 33(8), 6-
7.
Tatar, M., & Emmanuel, G. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of their students' gender roles [Electronic
version]. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 215-224.
Technical Education Research Centers. (2000). Weaving gender equity: Workshops. Retrieved March 16,
2005, from http://www.terc.edu/wge/rgworkshops.html
Thompson, R., Stephenson-Hawk, D., & Clark, B. (1999). Integrating gender equity and reform: Toolkit of
curriculum materials. Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http:// www.coe.uga.edu/ingear/
Thorne, B. (1993). Do boys and girls have different cultures? In E. Rassen & L. Iura (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass
reader on gender in education (pp. 125-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1681. (1972).
U.S. Census 2000. (2000). Census bureau homepage. Retrieved October 17, 2004, from
http://www.census.gov/
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Gender equity expert panel: Exemplary and promising gender
equity programs. Retrieved March 15, 2005, from http://www
.ed.gov/pubs/genderequity/gender_equity.doc
Usselman, M., & Whiting, D. (2002, June). Gender equity professional development for teachers in a
summer camp setting. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition,
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Willis, J. (2001). Foundational assumptions for information technology and teacher education.
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(3), 305-320. Retrieved March 12, 2005,
from http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss3/ editorials/article1.htm
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and
practical guidelines (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
