References
Amendum, S.J., Conradi, K., & Hiebert, E. H. (2018). Does text complexity matter in the elementary grades? A research synthesis of text difficulty and elementary students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 121-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9398-2
Amplify Education, Inc. (2020). Amplify Core Knowledge Language Arts CKLA. Brooklyn, NY: Author.
Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2011). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 107-125.
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1985). Teaching vocabulary: Making the instruction fit the goal. Educational Perspectives, 23(1), 11-15.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Clay, M. M., & Cazden, C. B. (1999). A Vygotskian interpretation of reading recovery. In P. Lloyd & C. Fernyhough (Eds.) Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments, Volume III: The zone of proximal development (pp. 354-70). New York: Routledge.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Text-based recall and extra-textual generations resulting from simplified and authentic texts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(1), 1-19. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/66713
Crossley, S. A., Yang, H. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). What's so simple about simplified texts? A computational and psycholinguistic investigation of text comprehension and text processing. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(1), 92-113. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/66686
Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202-224. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339
Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2014). The F&P Text Level Gradient revision to recommended grade-levels. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Retrieved from https://www.fountasandpinnell.com/shared/resources/FP_FPL_Whitepaper_The-FP-Text-Level-Gradient_v2014-06.pdf
Gough, P. & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
Hiebert, E. H. (2014). The forgotten reading proficiency: Stamina in silent reading. In E.H. Hiebert (Ed.), Stamina, Silent Reading, & the Common Core State Standards. Santa Cruz, CA: Text Project.
Hiebert, E. H. (2018, November 28-December 1). Vocabulary and topic familiarity: Variable or static across text levels? Literacy Research Association Annual Conference, Indian Wells, CA. https://www.literacyresearchassociation.org/assets/LRA-2018%20Conf%20PROGRAM.pdf
Hiebert, E. H., & Mesmer, H. A. E. (2013). Upping the ante of text complexity in the Common Core State Standards: Examining its potential impact on young readers. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12459802
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. (2020). Into Reading. Boston, MA; Author.
Lawshe, C. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
Li, D., Beecher, C., & Cho, B. Y. (2018). Examining the reading of informational text in 4th grade class and its relation with students' reading performance. Reading Psychology, 39(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1361493
Lupo, S. M., Tortorelli, L., Invernizzi, M., Ryoo, J. H., & Strong, J. Z. (2019). An exploration of text difficulty and knowledge support on adolescents' comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(4), 457-479. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.247
McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers' prior knowledge. International electronic journal of elementary education, 4(1), 229-257.
Mesmer, H. A., Cunningham, J. W., & Hiebert, E. H. (2012). Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning from the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.019
Metametrix. (2021). The Lexile Framework for Reading: Matching readers with texts. https://lexile.com/
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
National Reading Panel (U.S.) & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Netburn, D. (2018). Scientists build a robotic fish to spy on ocean life. https://newsela.com/read/robotic-fish-ocean-spy/id/41688/
Newsela.com. (2021). About:Who we are. https://support.newsela.com/hc/en-us/articles/360008500391-Grade-to-Lexile-Conversion
ReadWorks. (2020). ReadWorks solutions. https://www.readworks.org/our-solutions
Reed, D. K., & Kershaw-Herrera, S. (2016). An examination of text complexity as characterized by readability and cohesion. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.963214
Savvas Learning Company (2016). ReadyGen Literacy Program. Paramus, NJ: Author.
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy. New York: Guilford Press.
Smith, D. R., Stenner, A. J., Horabin, I., & Smith, M. (1989). The Lexile scale in theory and practice: Final report for NIH grant ID-19448. New Orleans: International Reading Association conference.
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
Smithsonian TweenTribune. (n.d.). TweenTribune. Smithsonian. https://www.tweentribune.com/
Tilden, V., Nelson, C., & May, B. (1990). Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity. Nursing Research, 39(3), 172-175.
Tortorelli, L. S. (2020). Beyond first grade: examining word, sentence, and discourse text factors associated with oral reading rate in informational text in second grade. Reading and Writing, 33(1), 143-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09956-5
Wilson, F., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286.
Xu, W., Callison-Burch, C., & Napoles, C. (2015). Problems in current text simplification research: New data can help. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3, 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00139
