The Effect of Teaching with Anatomical Models in Science Education on Primary School Children’s Understanding of  Human Organs

Karsten Damerau; Melanie Marita Beudels; Christine  Börtitz; Nadja  El Balti; Laura Funk; Debora Westerholt; Julia Cohnen; Angelika Preisfeld

Vol. 14 No. 4 (2022) IEJEE

The Effect of Teaching with Anatomical Models in Science Education on Primary School Children’s Understanding of Human Organs

Karsten Damerau
Melanie Marita Beudels
Christine Börtitz
Nadja El Balti
Laura Funk
Debora Westerholt
Julia Cohnen
Angelika Preisfeld

Published April 28, 2022 | Pages: 539-555 | Views: 714

Download PDF

SHARE

Abstract

Primary school students often do not have differentiated conceptions of human organs and organ systems. As understanding the inner structure of the human body is an elementary prerequisite for the development of health awareness, appropriate forms of teaching must be developed to modify students’ fragmented preconceptions about the inside of their bodies into scientifically accurate concepts. Anatomical models are considered a medium to raise awareness of organs and their systemic integration; however, only a few studies have investigated their effectiveness in the context of primary school. This intervention study, therefore, examines the effect of anatomical models on the conceptions of inner organs in German primary school students (N = 45) in a pretest, posttest, and follow-up test design with anatomy teaching between pre- and posttests. Concepts were measured using students' drawings in two treatment groups (anatomical models versus anatomical illustrations). While in both treatment groups students' conceptions changed toward more scientific concepts, there was little difference in the changes between the two groups. There were even indications that the students of the control group showed more pronounced increases, for example, in long-term systemic integration of the organs. We discuss the reasons for this and furnish recommendations for effective teaching practices.

<p class="p1">Primary school students often do not have differentiated conceptions of human organs and organ systems. As understanding the inner structure of the human body is an elementary prerequisite for the development of health awareness, appropriate forms of teaching must be developed to modify students’ fragmented preconceptions about the inside of their bodies into scientifically accurate concepts. Anatomical models are considered a medium to raise awareness of organs and their systemic integration; however, only a few studies have investigated their effectiveness in the context of primary school. This intervention study, therefore, examines the effect of anatomical models on the conceptions of inner organs in German primary school students (N = 45) in a pretest, posttest, and follow-up test design with anatomy teaching between pre- and posttests. Concepts were measured using students' drawings in two treatment groups (anatomical models versus anatomical illustrations). While in both treatment groups students' conceptions changed toward more scientific concepts, there was little difference in the changes between the two groups. There were even indications that the students of the control group showed more pronounced increases, for example, in long-term systemic integration of the organs. We discuss the reasons for this and furnish recommendations for effective teaching practices.</p>

Listen -

References

Adamina, M. (2008). Vorstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu raum-, zeit- und geschichtsbezogenen Themen: Eine explorative Studie in Klassen des 1., 3., 5. und 7. Schuljahres im Kanton Bern [Dissertation]. Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.
Adamina, M., Kübler, M., Kalcsics, K., Bietenhard, S [S.], & Engeli, E. (Eds.). (2018). „Wie ich mir das denke und vorstelle…“ - Vorstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu Lerngegenständen des Sachunterrichts und des Fachbereichs Natur, Mensch, Gesellschaft. Klinkhardt.
Barke, H.‑D. (2006). Chemiedidaktik: Diagnose und Korrektur von Schülervorstellungen. Springer-Verlag.
Bartoszeck, A. B., Machado, D. Z., & Amann-Gainotti, M. (2011). Graphic representation of organs and organ systems: Psychological view and developmental patterns. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75177
Bietenhard, S [Sophia], Gafner Knopf, A.‑M., & Jaun-Holderegger, B. (2018). Befinden und sich kennen: Glück, Gesundheit, Körper. In M. Adamina, M. Kübler, K. Kalcsics, S. Bietenhard, & E. Engeli (Eds.), „Wie ich mir das denke und vorstelle…“ - Vorstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu Lerngegen-ständen des Sachunterrichts und des Fachbereichs Natur, Mensch, Gesellschaft. (pp. 63–84). Klinkhardt.
Buckley, B. C., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Investigating the role of representations and expressed models in building mental models. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education (pp. 119–135). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_6
Carvalho, G. S., Silva, R., Lima, N., Coquet, E., & Clément, P. (2004). Portuguese primary school children's conceptions about digestion: Identification of learning obstacles. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1111–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000177235
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Comiskey, C., Coyne, I., Lalor, J., & Begley, C. (2014). A national cross-sectional study measuring predictors for improved service user outcomes across clinical nurse or midwife specialist, advanced nurse practitioner and control sites. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12273
Copolo, C. E., & Hounshell, P. B. (1995). Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211261
Dilber, R., & Duzgun, B. (2008). Effectiveness of analogy on students' success and elimination of misconceptions. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 2(3), 174–183. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/2734605.pdf
Duit, R. (1997). Alltagsvorstellungen und Konzeptwechsel im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven für den Sachunterricht in der Primarstufe. In W. Köhnlein, B. Marquardt-Mau, & H. Schreier (Eds.), Forschungen zur Didaktik des Sachunterrichts: Bd. 1. Kinder auf dem Wege zum Verstehen der Welt (pp. 233–246). Klinkhardt. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=9ojlhuaaaaaj&hl=de&oi=sra
Duit, R., Roth, W.‑M., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (2001). Fostering conceptual change by analogies—between Scylla and Charybdis. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00034-7
Garcia-Barros, S., Martínez-Losada, C., & Garrido, M. (2011). What do children aged four to seven know about the digestive system and the respiratory system of the human being and of other animals? International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2095–2122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.541528
Gaudion, C. (2000). Children’s knowledge of their internal anatomy. In E. A. Glasper & L. Ireland (Eds.), Evidence-based Child Health Care: Challenges for Practice (pp. 148–162). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-333-98239-6_9
Gellert, E. (1962). Children's conceptions of the content and functions of the human body. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 65, 293–405. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Children's-conceptions-of-the-content-and-functions-Gellert/8e7b5cddd3a7bf06213880658697015b7ee4a618
Gesellschaft für Didaktik des Sachunterrichts. (2013). Perspektivrahmen Sachunterricht. Julius Klinkhardt.
Glynn, S. M., Law, M., Gibson, N. M., & Hawkins, C. H. (1994). Teaching science with analogies: A resource for teachers and textbook authors. National Reading Resource, 7, 9–20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED378554
Grimm, H., Todorova, M., & Möller, K. (2020). Schülervorstellungen in einem inquiry-orientierten Sachunterricht verändern – Besteht ein Zusammenhang mit der Förderung adäquaten Schlussfolgerns? Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 26(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-020-00110-1
Haider, M [Marika]. (2019). Modellkompetenz Im Naturwissenschaftlichen Sachunterricht: Eine Empirische Studie Zum Lernen Mit Modellen und über Modelle in der Primarstufe. Logos.
Haider, M [Michael]. (2010). Der Stellenwert von Analogien für den Erwerb naturwissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse: Eine Untersuchung im Sachunterricht der Grundschule am Beispiel "Elektrischer Stromkreis" (1. Aufl.). Klinkhardt-Forschung. Klinkhardt. https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/book/10.35468/9783781550117
Hammann, M. (2019). Organisationsebenen biologischer Systeme unterscheiden und vernetzen: Empirische Befunde und Empfehlungen für die Praxis. In J. Groß, M. Hammann, P. Schmiemann, & J. Zabel (Eds.), Biologiedidaktische Forschung: Erträge für die Praxis (pp. 77–91). Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58443-9_5
Haque, A., Minhas, R. S., Faisal, T., Naseem, S., Ambreen, S., & Rafi, A. (2021). Effect on academic performance by learning through 3D anatomy atlas versus 2D presentations. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 71(5), 1700–1704. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i5.6963
Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2004). Die Integration von Repräsentationsformen in den Sachunterricht der Grundschule. In J. Doll & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule, Lehrerprofessionalisierung, Unterrichtsentwicklung und Schülerförderung als Strategien der Qualitätsverbesserung (pp. 267–283). Waxmann. https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/didaktik_des_sachunterrichts/dokumente/literaturmoeller/integration.pdf
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301010
Hartinger, A [A.], & Murmann, L. (2018). Schülervorstellungen erschließen – Methoden, Analyse, Diagnose. In M. Adamina, M. Kübler, K. Kalcsics, S. Bietenhard, & E. Engeli (Eds.), „Wie ich mir das denke und vorstelle…“ - Vorstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu Lerngegen-ständen des Sachunterrichts und des Fachbereichs Natur, Mensch, Gesellschaft. (pp. 51–62). Klinkhardt.
Heitzmann, A. (2019). Modelle verwenden. In P. Labudde & S. Metzger (Eds.), Fachdidaktik Naturwissenschaft: 1.- 9. Schuljahr (pp. 89–104). UTB.
Ingham, A. M., & Gilbert, J. K. (1991). The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level. International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130206
Krüger, D., Kauertz, A., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2018). Modelle und das Modellieren in den Naturwissenschaften. In D. Krüger, I. Parchmann, & H. Schecker (Eds.), Theorien in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung (1st ed., pp. 141–157). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56320-5_9
Krumphals, I., Plotz, T., & Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C. (2020). Schülervorstellungen in den Naturwissenschaftsdidaktiken. In S. Habig (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen in der Gesellschaft von morgen: Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen in der Gesellschaft von morgen. Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik Jahrestagung in Wien 2019. Universität Duisburg-Essen. https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2020/20445/pdf/habig_2020_naturwissenschaftliche_kompetenzen_in_der_gesellschaft.pdf#page=95
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Manokore, V., & Reiss, M. J. (2005). Pupils' drawings of what is inside themselves: A case study in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.4314/zjer.v15i1.26020
Mason, L. (1994). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects in conceptual change by analogy. Instructional Science, 22(3), 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892241
Meisert, A. (2014). Mit Modellen lernen. In U. Spörhase-Eichmann & W. Ruppert (Eds.), Biologie-Methodik: Handbuch für die Sekundarstufe I und II (3rd ed., pp. 121–127). Cornelsen.
Möller, K. (1999). Konstruktivistisch orientierte Lehr-Lernprozessforschung im naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Bereich des Sachunterrichts. In W. Köhnlein, B. Marquardt-Mau, & H. Schreier (Eds.), Vielperspektivisches Denken im Sachunterricht (pp. 125–191). Klinkhardt.
Möller, K. (2015). Genetisches Lernen und Conceptual Change. In J. Kahlert, M. Fölling-Albers, M. Götz, A. Hartinger, S. Miller, & S. Wittkowske (Eds.), utb-studi-e-book: Vol. 8621. Handbuch Didaktik des Sachunterrichts (2nd ed., pp. 243–249). Klinkhardt; Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.
Möller, K. (2018). Die Bedeutung von Schülervorstellungen für das Lernen im Sachunterricht. In M. Adamina, M. Kübler, K. Kalcsics, S. Bietenhard, & E. Engeli (Eds.), „Wie ich mir das denke und vorstelle…“ - Vorstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu Lerngegen-ständen des Sachunterrichts und des Fachbereichs Natur, Mensch, Gesellschaft. (pp. 35–50). Klinkhardt.
Möller, K., Jonen, A., Hardy, I., & Stern, E. (2002). Die Förderung von naturwissenschaftlichem Verständnis bei Grundschulkindern durch Strukturierung der Lernumgebung. In M. Prenzel & J. Doll (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: Schulische und außerschulische Bedingungen mathematischer, naturwissenschaftlicher und überfachlicher Kompetenzen.: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft 45 (pp. 176–191). Beltz. https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=3946
Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2020). Qualitätsanforderungen an Tests und Fragebogen („Gütekriterien“). In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Eds.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61532-4
MSB NRW. (2021). Lehrpläne für die Primarstufe in Nordrhein-Westfalen. MSB NRW. https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/lehrplaene/upload/klp_PS/ps_lp_sammelband_2021_08_02.pdf
Narang, P., Raju, B., Jumah, F., Konar, S. K., Nagaraj, A., Gupta, G., & Nanda, A. (2021). The evolution of 3D anatomical models: A brief historical overview. World Neurosurgery, 155, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.133
Nicholson, D. T., Chalk, C., Funnell, W. R. J., & Daniel, S. J. (2006). Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Medical Education, 40(11), 1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02611.x
Olson, G. M., Duffy, S. A., & Mack, R. L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research (pp. 253–286). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505379-11
Óskarsdóttir, G. (2006). The development of children's ideas about the body: How these ideas change in a teaching environment [PhD]. University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Óskarsdóttir, G., Stougaard, B., Fleischer, A., Jeronen, E., Lützen, F., & Kråkenes, R. (2011). Children’s ideas about the human body – A Nordic case study. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 7(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.240
Piko, B. F., & Bak, J. (2006). Children's perceptions of health and illness: Images and lay concepts in preadolescence. Health Education Research, 21(5), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl034
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
Prokop, P., & Fancovicová, J. (2006). Students´ ideas about the human body: Do they really draw what they know? Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2(10), 86–95.
Przywarra, T., & Risch, B. (2019). Modelleinsatz im Chemieunterricht Illustrativ, haptisch-interaktiv oder digital erweitert. In C. Maurer (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung als Grundlage für berufliche und gesellschaftliche Teilhabe: Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik, Jahrestagung in Kiel 2018 (pp. 616–619). Universität Regensburg.
Ranaweera, S. P. N., & Montplaisir, L. M. (2010). Students' illustrations of the human nervous system as a formative assessment tool. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3(5), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.162
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Kaman, A., Otto, C., Adedeji, A., Devine, J., Erhart, M., Napp, A.‑K., Becker, M., Blanck-Stellmacher, U., Löffler, C., Schlack, R., & Hurrelmann, K. (2020). Mental health and quality of life in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic-results of the copsy study. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 117(48), 828–829. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0828
Reiss, M. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Students' Understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013116228261
Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Mathematics. Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science (New York, N.Y.), 316(5828), 1128–1129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1142103
Riemeier, T., Jankowski, M., Kersten, B., Pach, S., Rabe, I., Sundermeier, S., & Gropengiesser, H. (2010). Wo das Blut fließt. Schülervorstellungen zu Blut, Herz und Kreislauf beim Menschen. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 77–93.
Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: how do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0048
Shin, W.‑S., & Shin, D.‑H. (2016). An analysis of elementary students' attention characteristics through attention test and the eye tracking on real science classes. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(4), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0705
Smith, C. F., Tollemache, N., Covill, D., & Johnston, M. (2018). Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718
Spägele, E. (2008). Naturwissenschaftliches Vorverständnis von Schulanfängern [Dissertation, Pädagogische Hochschule Weingarten, Weingarten]. RIS. https://hsbwgt.bsz-bw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docid/34
Spägele, E., & Flintjer, B. (2011). Naturwissenschaftliches Vorverständnis von Kindern zum Zeitpunkt der Einschulung: Eine Studie zu außerschulisch erworbenen Kenntnissen und Vorstellungen. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Biologie (ZDB) - Biologie Lehren und Lernen, 18, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4119/zdb-1641 (1-22 Seiten / Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Biologie (ZDB) - Biologie Lehren und Lernen, Bd. 18 (2011)).
Stiftung Haus der kleinen Forscher. (2016). Forschen rund um den Körper. Stiftung Haus der kleinen Forscher.
Talairach-Vielmas, L. (2014). Anatomical models: A history of disappearance? Histoire, Médecine Et Santé, 5, 9–20.
Vocilka, A. (2005). Schülervorstellungen zum Zustandekommenkognitiver Leistungen unter besondererBerücksichtigung der Wahrnehmung [Diplomarbeit]. Pädagogische Hochschule Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg.
Wirtz, M., & Kutschmann, M. (2007). Analyse der Beurteilerübereinstimmung für kategoriale Daten mittels Cohens Kappa und alternativer Masse [Analyzing interrater agreement for categorical data using Cohen's kappa and alternative coefficients]. Die Rehabilitation, 46(6), 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-976535
Yılmaz, H. B. (2009). On the development and measurement of spatial ability. Nternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 83–96. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/iejee/article/view/279/302
Zilverschoon, M., Custers, E. J., Cate, O. ten, Kruitwagen, C. L. J. J., & Bleys, R. L. A. W. (2021). Support for using a three-dimensional anatomy application over anatomical atlases in a randomized comparison. Anatomical Sciences Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2110

Keywords

conceptual change, models, primary school, science education, students' drawings

Affiliations

Karsten Damerau

Europa University of Flensburg

Melanie Marita Beudels

University of Wuppertal

Christine Börtitz

Europa University of Flensburg

Nadja El Balti

Europa University of Flensburg

Laura Funk

University of Wuppertal

Debora Westerholt

University of Wuppertal

Julia Cohnen

University of Wuppertal

Angelika Preisfeld

University of Wuppertal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Damerau, K., Beudels, M. M., Börtitz, C., El Balti, N., Funk, L., Westerholt, D., Cohnen, J., & Preisfeld, A. (2022). The Effect of Teaching with Anatomical Models in Science Education on Primary School Children’s Understanding of Human Organs. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(4), 539–555. Retrieved from https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1796

Author Biography

Melanie Marita Beudels

Melanie Beudels is a research associate and lecturer at the Institute of Geography and General Studies at the University of Wuppertal. She works on professionalism in pre-service primary teacher education with a focus on science and technology.

Christine Börtitz

Christine Börtitz is a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Ecology and Environmental Education at the Europa University of Flensburg. Her research focuses on biodiversity and education.

Nadja El Balti

Nadja El Balti is a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Ecology and Environmental Education at the Europa-University of Flensburg. Her research focuses on biodiversity, nature conservation, and education.

Laura Funk

Laura Funk worked on Dr. Karsten Damerau and Dr. Melanie Marita Beudels’s research group on models in biological teaching–learning contexts as part of her final thesis.

Debora Westerholt

Debora Westerholt is a seconded teacher and involved in teacher education at the department for Zoology and Didactics of Biology at the University of Wuppertal. Her main research area is CLIL (content and language integrated learning).

Julia Cohnen

Julia Cohnen worked on Dr. Karsten Damerau and Dr. Melanie Marita Beudels’s research group on models in biological teaching–learning contexts as part of her final thesis.

Angelika Preisfeld

Angelika Preisfeld is a professor for Zoology and Didactics of Biology at the University of Wuppertal. She works on molecular evolution of protists and symbionts and is concerned with professionalism and knowledge transfer in teacher education. Her current focus lies on imparting digital competence for teacher education students.