Published
March 16, 2022
| Pages: 417-425 | Views: 473
Abstract
Formative assessment and related processes continue to prove to be a high-leverage instructional practice that has potential to support all learners, especially those who demonstrate misconceptions with significant mathematics concepts. Teachers use formative assessment practices in varied ways and share different perspectives of the value of these assessments for student learning. This article will share survey results of 65 teachers across grade levels. Findings indicate teachers find formative assessment beneficial for identifying gaps in learning, offers opportunity to increase student learning, and supports their teaching practices. These results support prior research; however, there were notable findings that offer insight into improving the use of formative assessment. The survey showed that formative assessment was used primarily to identify gaps, but not used to identify strengths of the learner. Formative assessment prompts focus on the learner but does not include reflection of the efficacy of the tool that was used or instruction. Commercially created materials, a large expense for schools, was not identified as useful. Teachers identified barriers to using formative assessment. Implications for improving formative assessment practices are shared and continued research.
References
- Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104-122. doi: 10.1080/20004508.2016.1275185
- Bahr, D. L., & de Garcia, L. A. (2010). Elementary mathematics is anything but elementary. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Baroudi, Z. (2007). Formative assessment: Definition, elements and role in instructional practice. Postgraduate Journal of Education Research, 8(1), 37-48.
- Baumert, J., Nagy, G., & Lehmann, R. (2012). Cumulative advantages and the emergence of social and ethnic inequality: Matthew effects in reading and mathematics development within elementary schools. Child Development, 83(4), 137-1367.
- Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working iside the black box: Assessment for leraning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8-21.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74.
- Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1109-1136.
- Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2012). Classroom assessments that inform instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48, 162-168. doi:10.1080/00228958.2012.733964
- Confrey, J., Toutkoushian, E., & Shah, M. (2019). A validation argument from soup to nuts: Assessing progress on learning trajectories for middle-school mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 32 (1), 23-42. doi:10.1080/08957347.2018.1544135
- Dignath, C., Buttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231-264. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
- Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 14(7), 1-12. doi:https://doi.org10.7275/jg4h-rb87
- Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de Leon, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: Findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44, 267-291.
- Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2007). Formative and summative assessments in the classroom. Westerville, OH: Association for Middle Level Education.
- Gezer, T., Wang, C., Polly, D., Martin, C. S., Pugalee, D. K., & Lambert, R. G. (2021). The relationship between formative assessment and summative assessment in Primary grade mathematics classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5), 73-85.
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
- Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140-145.
- Huinker, D. & Freckmann, J. (2009). Linking principles of formative assessment to classroom practice. Wisconsin Teacher of Mathematics, 60(2), 6-11.Institute for Educational Statistics (2009).
- Johnson, C. C., Sondergeld, T. A., Walton, J. B. (2019). A study of the implementation of formative assessment in three large urban districts. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2408-2438. doi:10.3102/0002831219842347
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
- Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28-37.
- Klute, M., Apthorp, H., Harlacher, J., Reale, M., & Marzano Research (2017). Formative assessment and elementary school student academic achievement: A review of the evidence. Washington DC: Instittue of Educational Sciences National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
- McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C., & Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the effect of formative assessment on student achievement: So much more is needed. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(2), 1-15.
- McNeill, H. & Polly, D. (in press). Exploring Primary Grades Teachers’ Perceptions of their Students’ Mathematics Self-Efficacy and How they Differentiate Instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01281-3
- National Center for Educational Statistics (2020). Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics. Retrieved from: https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics/?grade=4
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007). Benefits of formative assessment: Assessment research clips. Reston, VA: Author.
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2019). Programme for International Student Assessment Report 2018 Results (Volume I). Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-i-5f07c754-en.htm
- Panadero, E., & Anders, J. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
- Pilli, O., & Aksu, M. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the achievement, attitudes and retention of fourth grade mathematics students in North Cyprus. Computers & Education, 62, 62-71.
- Polly, D., Martin, C. S., Wang, C., Lambert, R., Pugalee, D. K., & Middleton, C. (2016). The influence of professional development on primary teachers’ TPACK and use of formative assessment. In M. Niess, K. Hollebrands, & S. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Transforming Mathematics Teacher Education in the Digital Age. (pp. 382-405). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0120-6.ch015
- Polly, D., Wang, C., Martin, C. S., Lambert, R. G., Pugalee, D. K., & Middleton, C. W. (2017). The influence of an internet-based formative assessment tool on primary grades students’ number sense achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 117(3-4), 127-136. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12214
- Polly, D., Wang, C., Martin, C., Lambert, R. G., Pugalee, D. K. & Middleton, C. W. (2018). The influence of mathematics teacher development, school-level, and teacher-level variables on primary students’ mathematics achievement. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0837-y
- Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school studies: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240-257.
- van den Berg, M., Bosker, R. J., & Suhre, C. J. M. (2017). Testing the effectiveness of classroom formative assessment in Dutch primary mathematics education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(3), 339-361. doi:10.1080/09243453.2017.1406376
- Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Wilson, M. (2018). Making measurement important for education: The crucial role of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 5-20. doi:10.1111/emip.2018.37.issue-1
- Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2015). Primary teachers’ attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128-136.
- Yeh, S. S. (2009). Class size reduction or rapid formative assessment? A comparison of cost-effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 7-15. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.09.001
Affiliations
Christie Martin
University of South Carolina
Maryann Mraz
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Drew Polly
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
