References
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.
Altun, M. (2015). Ortaokullarda matematik öğretimi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar için) (12.basım) Bursa: Alfa Aktüel Press.
Altun, M., Arslan, Ç., &Yazgan, Y. (2004). Lise matematik ders kitaplarının kullanım şekli ve sıklığı üzerine bir çalışma. UludağÜniversitesiEğitimFakültesiDergisi,17(2),131-147.
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Çev. Ed: Hasan Aydın, Eğitim Yayınevi, Konya.
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual review of psychology, 54(1), 579-616.
Butlen, D., & Vannier, M. P. (2010). Un exemple de situation pour la formation ASH (option D). Actes du XXXVIIème colloque COPIRELEM. La Grande Motte. ISBN:2-917294-05-1
Calmettes, B. (2007). Formation d'enseignants débutants à la mise en place d'une démarche d'investigation en classe. In Formation d'enseignants débutants à la mise en place d'une démarche d'investigation en classe (pp. 20-40).
Chevallard, Y. (1985) La transposition didactique, Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 25(2), 119-142.
Cresswell, J.W. Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları. (4. Baskı) Çev. Edt. S. B. Demir. Eğiten Kitap. Ankara.
Danesi, M. (2007).A conceptual metaphor framework for the teaching of mathematics. Studies in philosophy and education, 26(3), 225.
Dinham, S. (1993). Teachers under stress. Australian Educational Researcher,20(3), 1–16.
Drijvers, P., Tacoma, S., Besamusca, A., Doorman, M., & Boon, P. (2013). Digital resources inviting changes in mid-adopting teachers’ practices and orchestrations. ZDM, 45(7), 987-1001.
Dursun, Ş., & Dede, Y. (2004). Öğrencilerin matematikte başarısını etkileyen faktörler matematik öğretmenlerinin görüşleri bakımından. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2).
Gueudet, G. (2017). University teachers’ resources systems and documents. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 198-224.
Gueudet, G., & Lebaud, M. P. (2008). Quelle évaluation à l'université en mathématiques?. In Questions de pédagogie dans l'enseignement supérieur p. 289-299. Télécom Bretagne.
Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., Restrepo, A., Sabra, H., & Trouche, L. (2018). E-textbooks and connectivity: proposing an analytical framework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 539-558.
Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012). From text to'lived'resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (Vol. 7). Springer.
Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013). Collective work with resources: an essential dimension for teacher documentation. ZDM, 45(7), 1003-1016.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009a). Teachers’ work with resources: Documentational geneses and Professional geneses. In Gueudet, G., Pepin, B. & Trouche, L. (Eds.), From text to lived resources. p.23-43
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009b). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 199–218.
Guin, D., Ruthven, K., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2006). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument (Vol. 36). Springer Science & Business Media.
Hammoud R. (2012). Le travail collectif des professeurs en chimie comme levier pour la mise en œuvre de démarches d’investigation et le développement des connaissances professionnelles. Contribution au développement de l’approche documentaire du didactique. Doctoral Dissertation, Lyon 1 University, Lyon.
Hewson, P. W. (2004). Resources for science learning: tools, tasks, and environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,2(2),201-225.
Ilgar, Ş. (2005). Ev ödevlerinin öğrenci eğitimi açısından önemi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1).
İlter, İ. (2018). Öğretmenlerin sosyal bilgiler derslerinde öğretim yöntemleri ve uygulamaları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(1), 1-29.
Korkmaz, İ. (2004). Öğrencilerin başarılarını artırmada kullanılan öğretim stratejileri. Kişisel Gelişimde Çağdaş Yönelimler Sempozyumu. Proceedings Book. sf.327-336.
Kyriacou,C.(2001).Teacherstress:directionsforfutureresearch.EducationalReview,53(1),27–35.
Louden, L.W. (1987). Teacher stress: summary report of the joint committee of inquiry into teacher stress appointed by the minister for education and planning in W.A.Perth, W.A.: Govt. Printer.
Margolinas, C. (2002). Situations, milieux, connaissances: analyse de l’activité du professeur. Actes de la 11ème Ecole d’Eté de Didactique des Mathématiques, La pensée sauvage, pp.141-156.
Maschietto, M., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (2013). Designing a duo of material and digital artifacts: the pascaline and Cabri Elem e-books in primary school mathematics. ZDM, 45(7), 959-971.
Maurice, J. J., & Allégre, E. (2002). Invariance temporelle des pratiques enseignantes: le temps donné aux élèves pour chercher. Revue française de pédagogie, 115-124.
Ministry of National Education (2018). Mathematics Curriculum (Primary and Secondary Schools for the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8 th grades) Ankara.
Özmantar, M. F., Bingölbali, E., Demir, S., Sağlam, Y., & Keser, Z. (2009). Değişen öğretim programları ve sınıf içi normlar. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 6 (2).
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers’ work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation. ZDM, 45(7), 929-943.
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2017). Refining teacher design capacity: Mathematics teachers’ interactions with digital curriculum resources. ZDM, 49(5), 799-812.
Pepin, B.& Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms:A way to understand teaching and learning cultures.ZDM,33(5), 158–175.
Pithers, R.T. & Soden, R. (1999). Person-environment fit and teacher stress. Educational Research,41(1), 51–61.
Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. Handbook of research onthe psychology ofmathematicseducation,205-235.
Presmeg, N. (2008). An overarching theory for research in visualization in mathematics education. In ICME 11, Merida,Mexico.
Poisard, C., Bueno-Ravel, L., & Gueudet, G. (2011). Comprendre l'intégration de ressources technologiques en mathématiques par des professeurs des écoles. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 31(2), 151-189.
Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It? (2 nd ed.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Punch, K.F. & Tuetteman, E. (1996). Reducing teacher stress: the effects of support in the workenvironment. Research in Education,56, 63–72.
Rocha, KDM. (2018). Uses of online resources and documentational trajectories: the case of Sésamath. In: Fan L, Trouche L, Rezat S, Qi C, Visnovska J (eds) Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: advances and issues. Springer, 235–258.
Rösken, B., & Rolka, K. (2006). A picture is worth a 1000 words–the role of visualization in mathematics learning. In Proceedings PME-30, Vol. 4, 457-464.
Ruthven, K. (2013). From design-based research to re-sourcing ‘in the wild’: reflections on studies of the co-evolution of mathematics teaching resources and practices. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 1071-1079.
Sabra, H. (2016). L’étude des rapports entre documentations individuelle et collective: incidents, connaissances et ressources mathématiques. Rech Didactique Mathématiques 36(1):49–95.
Shaw, D. M., Barry, A., & Mahlios, M. (2008). Preservice teachers' metaphors of teaching in relation to literacy beliefs. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 14(1), 35-50.
Schmitz, B.&Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in7th-grade mathematichs. Contemporary Educational Pyschology 27, 26-50.
Trouche, L., Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2018). Documentational approach to didactics. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. NY: Springer. doi, 10, 978-3.
Trouche, L., & Pepin, B. (2014). From instrumental to documentational approach: towards a holistic perspective of teachers' resource systems in higher education. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 156-160.
Türkoğlu, A., Iflazoğlu, A.& Karakuş,̧M.(2007).İlköğretimdeÖdev.Ankara:MorpaKültürPress.
Usta, N., Yilmaz, M., Kartopu, S., & Kadan, Ö. F. (2018). Impact of visuals on primary school 4th graders' problem-solving success. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2160-2168.
Vergnaud, G. (1994). Le rôle de l’enseignant à la lumière des concepts de schème et de champ conceptuel. Vingt ans de didactique des mathématiques en France, Grenoble, La Pensée Sauvage, 177-191.
