References
Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A., & Fooi, F. S. (2009). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communication technology. Online Submission, 2(1), 77-104.
Anne T. O., Krista, D. G., Timothy, J. N., & Peggy, A. E. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55, 1321-1335.
Armbruster, B. (1992). Science and reading. The Reading Teacher, 46(4), 346-347.
Baker , E . (Ed.). (2010). The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
Bulfin, S., & North, S. (2007). Negotiating digital literacy practices across school and home: Case studies of young people in Australia. Language and Education, 21(3), 247-263.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57, 1184-1193.
Chase, Z., & Laufenberg, D. (2011). Embracing the squishiness of digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(7), 535-537.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
Coiro, J. (2009). Rethinking online reading assessment. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 59-63.
Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the internet contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352-392.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An international journal, 4(3), 164-195.
Coppola, E. M. (2004). Powering up: Learning to teach well with technology. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cromley, J. (2009). Reading achievement and science proficiency: International comparisons from the programme on international student assessment. Reading Psychology, 30, 89-118.
Cüre, F., & Özdener, N. (2008). Öğretmenlerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri (BİT) uygulama başarıları ve BİT’e yönelik tutumları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 41-53.
Çakır, R., & Yıldırım, S. (2009). What do computer teachers think about the factors affecting technology integration in schools. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 952-964.
Demps, D. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). The relationship between eighth-grade reading scores and achievement on the Georgia High School Graduation Test. Research in the Schools, 8(2), 1-9.
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365.
Duru, A. & Koklu, O. (2011). Middle school students’ reading comprehension of mathematical texts and algebraic equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(4), 447-468.
Gallego, M, & Hollingsworth, S. (1992). Multiple literacies: Teachers’ evolving perceptions. Language Arts, 69(3), 206-213.
Geary, D.C., Hamson, C.O., & Hoard, M.K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236-263.
Goodfellow, R. (2004). Online literacies and learning: Operational, cultural and critical dimensions. Language and Education, 18(5), 379-399.
Göktaş, Y., Yıldırım, Z., & Yıldırım, S. (2008). Status of Ict in schools of teacher education: Deans’ views. Education and Science, 33(149), 30-50.
Grimm, K. (2008). Longitudinal associations between reading and mathematics achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 419-420.
Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2006). Recentering the middle school classroom as a vibrant learning community: Students, literacy and technology intersect. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(8), 648-660.
Gülbahar, Y. (2008). Improving the technology integration skills of prospective teachers through practice: a case study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 71-81.
Henry, L. A. (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 614-627.
Hobbs, R., & Tuzel, S. (2015). Teacher motivations for digital and media literacy: An examination of Turkish educators. British Journal of Technology, 46, 1-16.
Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575-611.
Ito, M., Antin, J., Finn, M., Law, A., Manion, A., Mitnick, S., ... & Horst, H. A. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. MIT press.
Ito, M., Horst, H. A., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stevenson, B., & Lange, P. (2008). White paper-Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. Chicago: The John P. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
Kayaduman, H., Sırakaya, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Eğitimde FATİH projesinin öğretmenlerin yeterlik durumları açısından incelenmesi. Akademik Bilişim, 11, 123-129.
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2009). Remix: The art and craft of endless hybridization. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 22-33.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2008). The Web as a source of information for students in K–12 education. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 241-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kumar, D., & Bristor, V. (1999). Integrating Science and language arts through technology-based macrocontexts. Educational Review, 51(1), 41-53.
Lai, K. W., & Pratt, K. (2004). Information and communication technology (ICT) in secondary schools: the role of the computer coordinator. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 461-475.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Leu, D.J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leu, D.J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the internet and other digital technologies. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2014). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37-59.
Leu, D. J., Gregory McVerry, J., Ian O'Byrne, W., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett‐Cacopardo, H., Kenndy, C., & Forzani, E. (2011). The new literacies of online reading comprehension: Expanding the literacy and learning curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 5-14.
Leu, D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L.A. (2013). New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D.E. Alvermann , N.J. Unrau & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed. , pp. 1150-1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470-501.
Light, J.G., & DeFries, J.C. (1995). Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disabilities: Genetic and environmental etiologies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 96-106.
López, O. S. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54(4), 901-915.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
Mason, L. H., & Hedin, L. (2011). Reading science text: Challenges for students with learning disabilities and considerations for teachers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 214-222.
Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246-271.
Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2012). Mplus (Version 7.1). California. Los Angeles.
OECD (2013a). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do—Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264201118-en
OECD (2013b). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264190511-en
OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Technical Report, PISA. Paris, France: OECD Publishing
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional “high-stakes” measures of high school students’ science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 161-196.
Pape, S.J. (2004). Middle school children’s problem-solving behavior: A cognitive analysis from a reading comprehension perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 187-219.
Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142-151.
Sahay, S., & Avgerou, C. (2002). Introducing the special issue on information and communication technologies in developing countries. The Information Society, 18(2), 73-76.
Schleicher, A., Zimmer, K., Evans, J., & Clements, N. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework : Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schmar-Dobler, E. (2003). Reading on the Internet: The link between literacy and technology. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(1), 80-85.
Selwyn, N., Potter, J., & Cranmer, S. (2009). Primary pupils' use of information and communication technologies at school and home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 919-932.
Street, B. (2003). What’s new in new literacy studies? Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 1-14.
Sutherland-Smith (2002). Weaving the literacy Web: Changes in reading from page to screen. The Reading Teacher, 55, 662-669.
Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp.653-771). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Usluel, Y. K., Mumcu, F. K., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). Öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri: Öğretmenlerin entegrasyon süreci ve engelleriyle ilgili görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 164-178.
Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., & Stone, L. (2004). Technology and equity in schooling: Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy, 18, 562-588.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225.
Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409-426.
Yalın, H.İ., Karadeniz, Ş., & Şahin, S. (2007). Barriers to information and communication technologies integration into elementary schools in Turkey. Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(24), 4036-4039.
Yurdakul, I. K. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının teknopedagojik eğitim yeterliklerinin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerini kullanımları açısından incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 397-408.
