Developing Children’s Computational Thinking through Physical Computing Lessons

Sun Hee Min; Min Kyeong Kim

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020) IEJEE

Developing Children’s Computational Thinking through Physical Computing Lessons

Sun Hee Min
Min Kyeong Kim

Published January 14, 2021 | Pages: 183-198 | Views: 373

Download PDF

SHARE

Abstract

In this study, we designed and applied physical computing lessons for elementary 6th-grade students based on the software education guidelines in the Korean 2015 Revised National Curriculum (Ministry of Education, 2015a). The participants of this study were ten 6th-grade students of an elementary school in Gyeonggi-do province in Korea. The physical computing lessons used in this study supported the active interaction of the digital world and the physical world by constructing a physical model using specific media, and controlling it with a program. In order to understand the changes in the students’ computational thinking after the class, we analyzed these changes in terms of computational concept, computational practice, and computational perception. Research has shown that physical computing lessons materialize students’ computational concepts through computational practices, and improve their computational perspectives through the use of authentic contexts. We expect that the physical computing lessons and analysis tools developed through this study will provide educational implications for future software education.

<p>In this study, we designed and applied physical computing lessons for elementary 6th-grade students based on the software education guidelines in the Korean 2015 Revised National Curriculum (Ministry of Education, 2015a). The participants of this study were ten 6th-grade students of an elementary school in Gyeonggi-do province in Korea. The physical computing lessons used in this study supported the active interaction of the digital world and the physical world by constructing a physical model using specific media, and controlling it with a program. In order to understand the changes in the students’ computational thinking after the class, we analyzed these changes in terms of computational concept, computational practice, and computational perception. Research has shown that physical computing lessons materialize students’ computational concepts through computational practices, and improve their computational perspectives through the use of authentic contexts. We expect that the physical computing lessons and analysis tools developed through this study will provide educational implications for future software education.</p>

Listen -

References

Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenge. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63-71.

Anglei, C., Voot, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Maiyn-Smith, J., & & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47-57.

Bakke, C. K. (2013). Perceptions of professional and educational skills learning opportunities made available through K-12 robotics programming (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Capella.

Bebras Computational Challenges Recommended by UK Bebras Challenges (2015). Retrieved from http://bebras.uk

Bers, M. U. (2010). The tangible robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), 1-19.

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). Using artifactbased interviews to study the development of computational thinking in interactive media design. Paper presented at annual American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, Canada.

Chandra, V. (2010). Teaching and learning mathematics with robotics in middle-year of schooling. Paper presented at the envision the future: The role of curriculum materials and learning environments in educational reform. Hualien, Taiwan.

Choi, D. H., Choi, S. H., Ahn, J. J., Hong, H. J., & Jung, G. C. (2015). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) by teachers’ doing: Working with future generation. Seoul: UNESCO.

Choi, H. S. (2014). Developing lessons and rubrics to promote computational thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 57-64.

Computational Thinking recommended by Computer Science Teachers Association (2012). Retrieved from https://www.csteachers.org

Creative Computing recommended by Brennan, K., Balchm, C., & Chung, M (2015). Retrieved from http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/guide/

Denning. P. (2009). The profession on IT: Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 28-30. Retrieved from http://doi. org/10.1145/1516046.1516054

Denning. P. (2017). Computational thinking in science.

American Scientist, 105(1), 13-17. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1511/2017.124

Felica, A., & Sharif, S. (2014). A review on educational robotics as assistive tools for learning mathematics. International Journal of Computer Science Trends and Technology, 2(2), 62-84.

For Inspiration & Recognition of Science & Technology LEGO League (2015). Retrieved from https:// www.firstlegoleague.org/

Futscheck, G., & Moschitz, J. (2010). Developing algorithmic thinking by inventing and playing Algorithms. Constructionism, 1-10.

Griffths, A. j., Nash, A.M., Maupin, A., & Mathur, S. K. (2020). Her voice: Engaging and preparing girls with disabilities for science, technology, engineering, and math careers. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(3), 293-301.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: Review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.

Han, J. M., Jung, U. R., & Lee, Y. J. (2017). Analysis on research trends related computational thinking in Korea. The Korean Association of Information Education: Summer Conference, 21(2), 3-5.

Jeon, S. J., & Han, S. K. (2016). Development of UMC teaching and learning strategy for computational thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(2), 131138.

Kabátová, M., & Peárová, J. (2010). Learning how to teach robotics. Constructionism, 1-8.

Kim, D. J., Kim, S. H., & Ryu, H. C. (2013). STEAM educational outreach program based on physical computing. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 17(2). 279283.

Kim, J. H. (2009). Secondary education program for problem-solving ability based on computational thinking (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korea University, Seoul.

Kim, J. H., & Kim, D. H. (2016). Development of physical computing curriculum in elementary school for computational thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(1), 6982.

Kim, K. S. (2017). An analysis of software curriculum of Korean elementary teacher education school. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(6), 723-732.

Kim, M. J., & Lee, T. W. (2014). Development of the software educational program using LEGO WEDO. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(2), 37-40.

Kim, S. H., & Han, S. K. (2012). Design-based learning for computational thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 16(3), 319326.

Kim, T. H. (2015). STEAM education program based on programing to improve computational thinking ability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Jeju University, Jeju.

Kotopoulos, D., Flyod, L., Khan, S., Namukase, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A pedagogical framework for computational thinking: Mathematics and programming. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.100/s40751-0170031-2

Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allen, W., Erickson, J., Malyn-Smith, J., & Wener, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. Association for Computing Machinery, 2(1), 3237.

Lee, Y. J., Jeon, H. G., & Kim Y. S. (2017). Development and applyment selection standards of physical computing teaching aids for elementary SW education according to the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(4), 437-450.

Marion, P., Deits, R., Valenzuela, A., d’Arpino, C. P., Izatt, G., Manuelli, L., Antone, M., Koolen, T., Carter, J., Fallon, M., Kuindersma, S., & Tedrake, R. (2017). Director: A user interface designed for robot operation with shared autonomy. Journal of Field Robotics, 34(2), 262-280.

Ministry of Education (2015a). 2015 Revision curriculum.

Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M. M., Lamdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L.

(2015). Helping children learn mathematics (11th edition). John Wiley & Sons.

Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 59-69.

Ryu,

M. Y. & Han, S. K. (2015). Development of computational thinking-based educational program for SW education. Journal of Korean Association of Information Education, 19(1), 1120.

Korea.

Ministry of Education (2015b). Activation plan for SW education in K-12. Korea.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computer and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95-123.

Papert, S. (1999). Ghost in the Machine. ZineZone.com interview on how computers fundamentally change the way kids learn. Retrieved from http:// www.papert.org/articles/GhostInTheMachine. html\

Resnick, M. (2006). Computer as pain brush: Technology, play, and the creative society. Play=learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth, 192-208.

Resenick, M. (2007). Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Learning & Leading with Technology, 18–22.

Przybylla, M., & Romeike, R. (2014). Physical computing and its scope – Towards a constructionist computer science curriculum with physical computing. Informatics in Education, 13(2), 241254.

Psycharis, S., Kalovrektic, K., Sakellaridi, E., Korres, K., & Mastorodimos, D. (2017). Unfolding the curriculum: Physical computing, computational thinking and computational experiment in STEM’s transpupillary approach. European Journal of Engineering Research and Science, Special Issue: CIE 2017, 19-24.

Schulz, S., & Pinkwart, N. (2015). Physical computing in stem education. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 134-135). ACM.

Seiter, L., & Foreman, B. (2013). Modeling the learning progressions of computational thinking of primary grade students. In Proceeding of the Ninth Annual International Association for Computing Machinery Conference (pp. 59-66). ACM.

Seo, J. H., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). Development and application of educational contents for software education based on the integrative production for increasing the IT competence of elementary students. Journal of Korean Association of Information Education, 20(4), 357366.

Shin, S. K., & Bae, Y. K. (2014). Analysis and implication about elementary computer education in India. Journal of the Korea Association Education, 18(4), 585-594.

Shin, S. K., & Bae, Y. K. (2015). A study on the hierarchical instructional system design of software education by school system. Journal of the Korea Association Education, 19(4), 533-544.

Shin, S. Y., Cho, H. K., & Kim, M. R. (2013). A curriculum development on the robot literacy related with a mathematics and science curriculum for elementary and secondary school students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 16(6), 55-70.

Son, K. H., & Son, W. S. (2014). The development and application to computer programming education using Arduino. The Journal of Education, 34(3), 169-179.

Song, U. S. (2013). Development of robot education program for pre-service elementary teachers using educational robot and its application. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 14(3), 333341.

Song, U. S., & Gil, J. M. (2017). Development and application of software education program based on blended learning for improving computational thinking of pre-service elementary teachers. KIPS Tr. Software and Data Eng, 6(7), 353-360.

Talaee, E., & Noroozl, O. (2019). Re-conceptualization of “Digital Divide” among primary school; children in an Era of saturated access to technology. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(1), 27-35.

Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J. (2016). The long quest for computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli, Finland, Nov. 24–27, 2016), 120–129.

Tsai, M. J., Wang, C. Y. & Hsu. P. F. (2019). Developing the computer programming self-efficacy scale for computer literacy education. Journal of Education Computing Research, 56(8), 13451360.

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565-568.

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127-147.

Wiggns, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.

Wing,

J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 19(3), 33-35.

Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366, 317-3725.

Keywords

computational thinking, computational concepts, computational practices, computational perspectives, physical computing, elementary education

Affiliations

Sun Hee Min

Ewha Womans Univ.

Min Kyeong Kim

Ewha Womans Univ.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Min, S. H., & Kim, M. K. (2021). Developing Children’s Computational Thinking through Physical Computing Lessons. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 183–198. Retrieved from https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1233

Author Biography

Sun Hee Min

Department of Elementary Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea

Education

[Ph.D] Elementary Education, College of Education, Ewha Womans University (South Korea)

Dissertation: A study on Development and Application of Physical Computing Lessons to Promote Computational Thinking in Elementary School Students