References
Bar, V., & Galili, I. (1994). Stages of children's views about evaporation. International Journal of
Science Education, 16(2), 157-174.
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., Shouse, A. W., National Research Council (U.S.). Committee
on Science Learning Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. National Research Council (U.S.).
Board on Science Education & National Research Council (U.S.) (2007). Taking science to
school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: National Academies
Press.
Flavell, J. H. ( 2000 ). Development of children’s knowledge about the mental world. International
Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 15–23.
Gobert, J., & Buckley, B. (2000). Special issue editorial: Introduction to model-based teaching
and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894.
Goldberg, F., & Bendall, S. (1995). Making the invisible visible: A teaching/learning environment
that builds on a new view of the physics learner. American Journal of Physics 63(11), 978-991.
Jose, T. J. & Williamson, V. M. (2005). Molecular visualization in science education: An evaluation
of the NSF funded workshop. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(6), 937-943.
Klausmeier, H. J. (1992). Concept learning and concept teaching. Educational Psychologist, 27(3),
267. Larkin, J., & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words.
Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
Mandler, J. M. (2008). On the birth and growth of concepts. Philosophical Psychology, 21(2), 207-
230.
Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dualcoding
hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 484-490.
Mayer, R.E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user
interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational
Psychology, 93, 390-397.
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active
learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 256-265.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning.
Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
zMcNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always
better?Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in
learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43.
Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
National Research Council (U.S.) (1996). National science education standards: Observe, interact,
change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Project 2061 (American Association for the Advancement of Science) (1993). Benchmarks for
science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in
elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International
Journal of Science Education, 23, 373-404.
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2010). Effects of an integrated instructional model for
accelerating student achievement in science and reading comprehension in grades 1-2.
Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver,
CO.
Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and
adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 114–
121.
Shwartz, Y., Weizman, A., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., & Reiser, B. (2008). Middle school science
curriculum: Coherence as a design principle. Paper presented at the National Association of
Research in Science Teaching.
Slotta, J. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). The impact of ontology training on conceptual change:
Helping students understand the challenging topics in science. Cognition and Instruction, 24,
261-289.
Stein, N. L., Hernandez, M. W., & Anggoro, F. K. (2010). A theory of coherence and complex
learning in the physical sciences: What works (and what doesn't). In N. L. Stein & S. W.
Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental science goes to school. New York: Taylor and Francis, Inc.
Stein, N. L., Hernandez, M. W., Anggoro, F. K., & Hedberg, E. (under review). A developmental
study of physical science learning: Modeling invisible processes and starting early.
Stein, N. L., & Levine, L. J. (1989). The causal organization of emotional knowledge: A
developmental study. Cognition & Emotion, 3(4), 343-378.
Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1993). A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships
among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory, and reasoning. Argumentation,
7, 183-204.
Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1982). What's in a story: An approach to comprehension and
instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology, 2, 212-267. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In
Block, C.C. & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp.
176-200). New York: The Guilford Press.
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. W. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H.
Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83-111).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Trabasso, T., & Stein, N. L. (1997). Narrating, representing, and remembering event sequences.
In P. W. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event
comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 237-270).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lozano, S., MacKenzie, R., & Morrison, J. (2008). Enriching animations. In R.
Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change
in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
Winston, P. (1986). Learning by augmenting rules and accumulating censors. In R. S. Michalski,
Carbonell, J. G., & Mitchell, T. M. (Ed.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. New
York: Morgan Kaufmann.
