Teaching Writing—With or Without Metacognition?: An Exploratory Study of 11- to 12-Year-Old Students Writing A Book Review

Main Article Content

Stéphane Colognesi http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5763-5873 Clémence Piret Simon Demorsy Elise Barbier


In this contribution, we attempt to answer two research questions: (1) What effects do metacognitive questions have on students' writing skills ? and (2) How do students respond to metacognitive questions? To answer these questions, we conducted an experiment with 43 students who were 11 to 12 years old. They were engaged in writing in a particular genre: book reviews. These pupils belonged to two classes at the same school, and for three weeks they experienced an instructional system combining identified principles of effective writing instruction, taught by the same teacher. They were required to rewrite their text several times, with the only difference being that in one group, metacognitive questions was introduced before, during, and after writing, unlike in the other class. A total of 172 written productions were analyzed under both conditions. Student responses in the metacognition condition were also analyzed. Our results show that students in both conditions made significant progress. But in the metacognitive condition, students made more significant progress.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
COLOGNESI, Stéphane et al. Teaching Writing—With or Without Metacognition?: An Exploratory Study of 11- to 12-Year-Old Students Writing A Book Review. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 5, p. 459-470, july 2020. ISSN 1307-9298. Available at: <https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1128>. Date accessed: 19 sep. 2020.


Andrade, H. (1999). Student self-assessment: At the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment (ED 431 030). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED431030.pdf
Authors. (2016a).
Authors. (2016b).
Authors. (2017).
Authors. (2018a).
Authors. (2018b).
Authors. (2019).
Authors. (2020).
Ben-David, A., & Orion, N. (2013). Teachers’ voices on integrating metacognition into science education. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3161-3193. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.697208
Braund, H., & Soleas, E. (2019). The struggle is real: Metacognitive conceptualizations, actions, and beliefs of pre-service and in-service teachers. In J. Mena, A. Garcia-Calcarel, & F. Garcia-PeNalvo, (Eds.), Teachers’ professional development in global contexts (pp. 105-124). Brill-Sense.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 3-35). Erlbaum.
Büchel, F. P. (2015). De la métacognition à l’éducabilité cognitive [From metacognition to cognitive educability]. In F. P. Büchel (Ed.), L’education cognitive, le développement de la capacité d’apprentissage et son évaluation [Cognitive education, development of learning capacity and its evaluation ; pp. 9-44]. Lausanne, Suisse: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Cer, E. (2019). The instruction of writing strategies: The effect of the metacognitive strategy on the writing skills of pupils in secondary education. Sage Open.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dabène, M. (1991). Un modèle didactique de la compétence scripturale [A didactic model of competence in writing]. Repères, 41, 9-22.
Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers’ approaches towards word problem solving: elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 152-160.
Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). Students’ non-realistic mathematical modeling as drawback of teachers’ beliefs about and approaches to word problem solving. In B. Roesken-Winter (Ed.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education (pp. 137-156). Springer International Publishing.
Desoete, A., & Özsoy, G. (2017). Introduction: Metacognition, more than the Loch Ness monster. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/266
Doly, A-M. (1997). Métacognition et médiation à l’école [Metacognition and mediation at school]. In M. Grangeat (Ed.) La métacognition, une aide au travail des élèves [Metacognition as an aid to student work; pp. 17-61]. ESF.
Doudin, P. A., Martin, D., & Albanese, O. (1999). Métacognition et éducation [Metacognition and education]. Berlin : Peter Lang S.A.
Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Efklides A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
Efklides A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277-287. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
Escorcia, D., & Fenouillet, F. (2011). Quel rôle de la métacognition dans les performances en écriture?: analyse de la situation d’étudiants en sciences humaines et sociales [What role does metacognition play in writing performance?: analysis of the situation of students in the humanities and social sciences]. Revue Canadienne de l’Éducation, 34(2), 53-76.
Escorcia, D., & Fenouillet, F. (2018). Connaissances métacognitives et stratégies d’autorégulation impliquées dans la révision de textes : construction et validation d’un instrument autorapporté [Metacognitive knowledge and self-regulatory strategies involved in the revision of texts: construction and validation of a self-report instrument]. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 41(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.7202/1059171ar
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Focant, J. (2004). Stratégies d’autorégulation d’élèves de cinquième primaire en situation de résolution de problèmes arithmétiques [Self-regulatory strategies for Primary 5 students in arithmetic problem-solving situations; unpublished doctoral thesis]. Louvain-la-Neuve, Université Catholique de Louvain.
Focant, J., Grégoire, J., & Desoete. (2006). Goal-setting, planning and control strategies and arithmetical problem solving at grade 5. In A. Desoete & M. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 51-72). Netherlands: Leiden University.
Fox M. C., Ericsson K. A., Best R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychol. Bull. 137, 316–344.
Gagnière, L. (2010). Comment inciter les régulations métacognitives pour favoriser la résolution de problèmes mal structurés? [How to encourage metacognitive regulation to promote the resolution of poorly structured problems; unpublished doctoral thesis]. Université de Genève, Genève.
Graham, S., Harris, K., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 207-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001
Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.). Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
Hanin, V. (2018). Une approche tridimensionnelle de la résolution de problèmes mathématiques chez les élèves en fin d’enseignement primaire? [A three-dimensional approach to mathematical problem solving in late primary school students; unpublished doctoral thesis]. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
Hanin, V., & Van Nieuwenhoven, C. (2018). Évaluation d’un dispositif d’enseignement- apprentissage en résolution de problèmes mathématiques: Évolution des comportements cognitifs, métacognitifs, motivationnels et émotionnels d’un résolveur novice et expert. [Evaluation of a teaching-learning device in mathematical problem solving: Evolution of the cognitive, metacognitive, motivational and emotional behaviours of a novice and expert problem solver]. Évaluer. Journal International de Recherche en Éducation et Formation, 4(1), 37-66.
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Houart, M. (2017). L'apprentissage autorégulé: Quand la métacognition orchestre motivation, volition et cognition. Un modèle pour l'action pédagogique qui vise à rendre les étudiants plus autonomes [Self-regulated learning: When metacognition orchestrates motivation, volition and cognition. A model for pedagogical action that aims to make students more autonomous]. Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l'Enseignement Supérieur (RIPES), 2(33).
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 1-26.
Kim, M. M. J. (2016). Writing about writing: Qualities of metacognitive L2 writing reflections. Second Language Studies, 34(2), 1-54.
Ko, J., Sammons, P., & Bakkum, L. (2014). Effective teaching: A review of research and evidence. England: CfBT Education Trust.
Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., De Jong, P. F., & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 299-324.
Lester, F. K, Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. (1989). The role of metacognition in mathematical problem solving: a study of two grade seven classes. Bloomington IN: University of Indiana Mathematics Education Development Center.
Lord, M.-A. (2009). Composantes prises en compte dans l’évaluation de la compétence scripturale des élèves par des enseignants d’histoire du secondaire au Québec [Components taken into account in the assessment of students' writing competence by secondary school history teachers in Quebec]. Revue Canadienne des Jeunes Chercheures et Chercheurs en Éducation, 2(1), 1-9.
Lu, W. J. (2006). Relationship between metacognitive strategies and English writing. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 9, 25-27.
Mekala, S., Shabitha, M. P., & Ponmani, M. (2016). The role of metacognitive strategies in second language writing. GSTF Journal on Education, 4, 11-19.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.
Mitchum, A. L., Kelley, C. M., & Fox, M. C. (2016). When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology - General, 145, 200-219. doi: 10.1037/a0039923
Niwese, M., & Bazile, S. (2014). L’atelier d’écriture comme dispositif de diagnostic et de développement de la compétence scripturale : du centre de formations d’adultes à la classe [The writing workshop as a diagnostic and developmental device for writing competence: from the adult training center to the classroom]. Pratiques, 161-162. http://pratiques.revues.org/2063
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2(4), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x
Noël, B. (1997). La métacognition [Metacognition]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Özsoy, G. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between metacognition and mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(2), 227-235.
Özsoy, G., & Ataman, A. (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 68-83.
Perfect, T. J., & Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Applied metacognition (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Portelance, L. (1999). Enseigner pour développer la compétence métacognitive : analyse des liens entre des pratiques et les intentions qui les sous-tendent chez des enseignants de l’ordre secondaire [Teaching for development of metacognitive competence: Analyzing the links between practices and underlying intentions in secondary school teachers ; unpublished doctoral thesis]. Université de Montréal, Montréal.
Ramet, A. (2007). Creative writing: How to unlock your imagination, develop your writing skills and get published (6th ed.). Oxford, UK: How to Books.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2008). Confidence and cognitive test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 961-976. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012546
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? Instructional Science, 26, 127- 140.
van Weijen, D., & Janssen, T. (2018). High-quality writing instruction in Dutch primary education. A framework for national assessment. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL- 2018.18.03.03
Veenman, M. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75-97). Berlin: Waxmann.
Veenman, M., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14.
Veenman, M. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In A. Zohar and Y-J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (pp. 21-36). London, UK : Springer.
Vlassis, J., Mancuso, G., & Poncelet, D. (2014). Le rôle des problèmes dans l’enseignement des mathématiques : analyse des croyances d’enseignants du primaire [The Role of Problems in Mathematics Education: An Analysis of Primary Teachers' Beliefs]. Les Cahiers des Sciences de l’Education, 36, 143-175.
Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 269-189.
Yanyan, Z. (2010). Investigating the role of metacognitive knowledge in English Writing 1. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies, 14, 25-46.
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2014). Shared mechanisms for confidence judgements and error detection in human decision making. In S. M. Fleming & C. D. Frith (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of metacognition (pp. 147-167). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 3-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862.
Zimmerman, B., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (2000). Des apprenants autonomes. Autorégulation des apprentissages [Independent learners. Self-regulation of learning]. Bruxelles, Belgique: De Boeck.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). A writer’s discipline: The development of self-regulatory skill. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Writing and motivation (pp. 51-69). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101.