How do openers contribute to student learning?

References

Ardac, D. & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes
representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in
ScienceTeaching, 41(4), 317-337.
Berland, L.K. & Reiser, B.J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific
argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216).
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi
Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
Chiu, J. & Linn, M. (2012). The Role of Self-monitoring in Learning Chemistry with Dynamic
Visualizations. In Metacognition in Science Education (pp. 133–163). Dordrecht: Springer.
diSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eylon, B. & Linn, M. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in
science education. Review of Educational Research, 58(3), 251–301.
Gerard, L.F., Spitulnik, M., & Linn, M.C. (2011). Teacher Use of Evidence to Customize Inquiry Science
Instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1037-1063.
Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee
(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp.15-46). New York: MacMillan.
Johnstone, A.H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing
demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701-704.
Krajcik, J. (1991). Developing students' understandings of chemical concepts. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany, & B.
Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 117-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Linn, M.C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J.D. (2003). WISE Design for Knowledge Integration. Sci Ed, 87, 517-538
Linn, M.C. & Eylon, B.S. (2011). Science Learning and Instruction: Taking Advantage of Technology to
Promote Knowledge Integration. New York: Routledge.
Linn, M. C. & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Linn, M.C., Lee, H.S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J.L. (2006). Teaching and Assessing Knowledge
Integration in Science. Science, 313, 1049-1050.
Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge Books.
Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing the ontological nature of conceptual physics: A
contrast of experts and novices. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 373–400.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal
of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
Tamin, R., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P., & Schmid, R. (2011). What forty years of research says
about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study.
Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28.
White, B.Y. & Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible
to All Students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
Williams, M., Linn, M. C., Ammon, P., & Gearhart, M. (2004). Learning to Teach Inquiry Science in a
Technology-Based Environment: A Case Study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2),
189-206.
Zhang, Z. & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can Generating Representations Enhance Learning with Dynamic
Visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1177-1198.

Keywords

Technology, Science Education, Teaching Practices, Classroom Assessment, Formative Assessment ∗

Affiliations