Alternate Curricula as a Barrier to Inclusive Education for Students With Intellectual Disabilities

Main Article Content

Amy Hanreddy Daniel Östlund


Although intellectual disability is a culturally defined and often fluid concept, individuals with this label are often at the greatest risk of isolation and low expectations, particularly within school environments. Despite institutional narratives on educating and raising expectations for “all” students, the use of alternate curricula for individuals with intellectual disabilities creates a structural barrier that explicitly designates students as incapable of using the same curriculum as nondisabled peers. Through exemplars in the United States and Sweden, the authors argue the use and expansion of alternate curricula is an international trend with troubling short- and long-term consequences for students. In Sweden, a national alternative curriculum is required for all students with intellectual disabilities. In the United States, adoption of alternate achievement standards varies by state; yet, the use of alternate curricular materials in self-contained classrooms is widespread despite questionable alignment to general education standards. In addition to the challenges posed by a separate curriculum for students with intellectual disabilities, approaches to promoting authentic engagement and learning in the context of general education settings and curricula are discussed.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
HANREDDY, Amy; ÖSTLUND, Daniel. Alternate Curricula as a Barrier to Inclusive Education for Students With Intellectual Disabilities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 3, p. 235-247, jan. 2020. ISSN 1307-9298. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 21 feb. 2020.


Alberti, S. (2012). Making the shifts (Common Core State Standards). Educational Leadership, 70(4), 24-27. Retrieved from
Anderson, L., & Östlund, D. (2017). Assessments for learning in Grades 1-9 in a special school for students with intellectual disability in Sweden. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75, 508–524. Retrieved from
Andriichuk, N. (2017). Historical background of inclusive education development in the Nordic countries. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 4, 97-104. doi:10.15330/jpnu.4.1.97-104
Arvidsson, J. (2016). Sysselsättning och social rättvisa: En Nationell Registerstudie om
12,269 unga vuxna med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning [Post-school occupation and social justice: A National Registry study about 12,269 young adults with intellectual disability]. Doctoral dissertation, Halmstad University.
Barow, T. (2009). Kein Platz im Volksheim?: Die “Schwachsinnigenfürsorge” in Schweden 1916-1945. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553. doi:10.1002/sce.1022
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing
House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83, 39-43. doi:10.1080/00098650903505415
Beratan, G. (2008). The song remains the same: Transposition and the disproportionate
representation of minority students in special education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 11, 337-354. doi:10.1080/13613320802478820
Blanton, L. P., Pugach, M. C., & Florian, L. (2011). Preparing general educators to improve
outcomes for students with disabilities. Retreived from the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education and National Council for Learning Disabilities website:
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (3rd ed.). Bristol, England: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
Bouck, E. C. (2012). Secondary students with moderate/severe intellectual disability:
Considerations of curriculum and post-school outcomes from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 1175–1186. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01517.x
Brantlinger, E. (1995). Sterilization of people with mental disabilities issues, perspectives, and
cases. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
Browder, D., Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., & Algozzine, R. (2004). The alignment of alternate assessment content with academic and functional curricula. The Journal of Special Education, 37(4), 211-223.
Buckley, S., Bird, G., Sacks, B., & Archer, T. (2006). A comparison of mainstream and special
education for teenagers with Down Syndrome: Implications for parents and teachers. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 9(3), 54-67. doi:10.3104/reports.295
Capp, M. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21, 791-807. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074
Carey, A. (2009). On the margins of citizenship: Intellectual disability and civil rights in
twentieth-century America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Carnovali, S. (2017). The right to inclusive education of persons with disabilities in Italy. Reflections and perspectives. Athens Journal of Education, 4, 315-326. doi:10.30958/aje.4-4-1
Causton-Theoharis, J., Theoharis, G., Orsati, F., & Cosier, M. (2011). Does self-contained
special education deliver on its promises? A critical inquiry into research and practice. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24(2), 61-78. Retrieved from
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2019). About universal design for learning. Retrieved
Choi, H., & Park, S. (2018). Teachers’ evaluation of inclusive education practices in elementary schools at Seoul: Using the quality indicators of elementary inclusive education. Korean Journal of Special Education, 53(2), 23-52.
Cosier, M., Causton-Theoharis, J., & Theoharis, G. (2013). Does access matter? Time in general education and achievement for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 323-332. doi:10.1177/0741932513485448
Da Fonte, M., & Barton-Arwood, S. (2017). Collaboration of general and special education teachers: Perspectives and strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53, 99-106. doi:10.1177/1053451217693370
Downing, J. (2010). Academic instruction for students with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Dymond, S. K., Renzaglia, A., Gilson, C. L., & Slagor, M. T. (2007). Defining access to the general curriculum for high school students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 32, 1–15. doi:10.2511/rpsd.32.1.1
Dynamic Learning Maps. (2016). What is a learning map model? Retrieved from
Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142, 20 U.S.C.
European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2018). Evidence of the link between inclusive education and social inclusion: A review of the literature. Retrieved from
Every Student Succeeds Act. (2015). PL 114-95, 114 U.S.C.
Ferri, B., & Connor, D. (2004). Special education and the subverting of Brown. Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice, 8(1), 57-74. Retrieved from
Fisher, M., & Meyer, L. (2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 27, 165-174. doi:10.2511/rpsd.27.3.165
Giangreco, M. (2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive
classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 1-13. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-48.1.1
Giangreco, M., Broer, S., & Suter, J. (2011). Guidelines for selecting alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals: Field-testing in inclusion-oriented schools. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 22-38. doi:10.1177/0741932509355951
Giangreco, M., Suter, J., & Hurley, S. (2013). Revisiting personnel utilization in inclusion-oriented schools. Journal of Special Education, 47, 121-132. doi:10.1177/0022466911419015
Grim, A. (2015). Sitting in for disability rights: The section 504 protests of the 1970s [Web log post]. Retrieved from the National Museum of American History website:
Halle, J. W., & Dymond, S. K. (2008). Inclusive education: A necessary prerequisite to accessing the general curriculum? Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33/34, 196-198. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.196
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hehir, T., Grindal, T., Freeman, B., Lamoreau, R., Borquaye, Y., Burke, S. (2016). A summary of the evidence on inclusive education. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. Retrieved online at
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004, PL 108–446, 20 U.S.C.
Jackson, L., Ryndak, D. L., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2008). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and student learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33-34, 175-195. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.175
Janney, R., & Snell, M. (2006). Social relationships and peer support (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Jiménez, T. C., Graf, V. L., & Rose, E. (2007). Gaining access to general education: The promise of universal design for learning. Issues in Teacher Education, 16(2), 41-54. Retrieved from
Johnson, J., McDonnell, J., Holzwarth, V., & Hunter, K. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 214-227. doi:10.1177/10983007040060040301
Katsiyannis, A., Yell, M., & Bradley, R. (2001). Reflections on the 25th anniversary of the
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 324-334. doi:10.1177/074193250102200602
Katz, J. (2013). The three block model of universal design for learning (UDL): Engaging students in inclusive education. Canadian Journal of Education, 36, 153-194. Retrieved from
Keith, H., & Keith, K. D. (2013). Intellectual disability: Ethics, dehumanization, and a new moral community. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kleinert, H., Towles-Reeves, E., Quenemoen, R., Thurlow, M., Fluegge, L., Weseman, L., & Kerbel, A. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81, 312-328. doi:10.1177/0014402914563697
Kurth, J., Born, K., & Love, H. (2016). Ecobehavioral characteristics of self-contained high school classrooms for students with severe cognitive disability. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 41, 227-243. doi:10.1177/1540796916661492
Laughlin, H. (2004). The eugenical sterilization of the feeble-minded. In S. Noll & J. W. Trent
(Eds), Mental retardation in America: A historical reader (History of Disability Series,
pp. 225-231). New York: New York University Press.
Lee, S.-H., Amos, B. A, Gragoudas, S., Lee, Y., Shogren, K. A., Theoharis, R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2006). Curriculum augmentation and adaptation strategies to promote access to the general curriculum for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 199-212. Retrieved from the Council for Exceptional Children website:
Lee, S.-H., Wehmeyer, M. L., Soukup, J. H., & Palmer, S. B. (2010). Impact of curriculum modifications on access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76, 213–233. doi:10.1177/001440291007600205
Los Angeles Unified School District. (2017). Determining the appropriate educational placement for students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment (LRE). Retrieved from
Lowrey, K., Drasgow, E., Renzaglia, A., & Chezan, L. (2007). Impact of alternate assessment on curricula for students with severe disabilities: Purpose driven or process driven? Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 244-253. doi:10.1177/15345084070320040601
Lyon, K. J., Blue-Banning, M., & McCart, A. B. (2014). Lessons from the field. Lawrence, KS: National Center on Schoolwide Inclusive School Reform: The SWIFT Center.
McClammy, W. (2017, March 21). Not special needs [Public service announcement]. Retrieved from
McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., & Mcquivey, C. (2000). Comparison of the instructional contexts of students with severe disabilities and their peers in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 25, 54-58. doi:10.2511/rpsd.25.1.54
McLeskey, J., Waldron, N., Spooner, F., & Algozzine, B. (2014). Handbook of effective inclusive schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
Mkrttchian, V. (2018). Project-based learning for students with intellectual disabilities. In P. L. Epler (Ed.), Instructional strategies in general education and putting the Individuals With Disabilities Act (IDEA) into practice (pp. 196-221). doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3111-1.ch007
Morningstar, M., Kurth, J., & Johnson, P. (2017). Examining national trends in educational placements for students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 3-12.
Mueller, T. G., Milian, M., & Lopez, M. I. (2009). Latina mothers’ views of a parent-to-parent
support group in the special education system. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 34, 113-122. doi:10.2511/rpsd.34.3-4.113
Mueller, T. G., Singer, G., & Carranza, F. (2006). A national survey of the educational planning and language instruction practices for students with moderate to severe disabilities who are English language learners. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 242-254. doi:10.1177/154079690603100304
n2y. (2019a). A total solution for education. Retrieved from
n2y. (2019b). Los Angeles Unified School District [Case study]. Retrieved from
National Center and State Collaborative. (2014). Core content connectors. Retrieved from
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2019). Inclusion of students with disabilities. Retrieved from
National Council on Disability. (2018). The segregation of students with disabilities. Retrieved from
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.
Nirje, B. (2003). Normaliseringsprincipen [The principle of normalization]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002).
Noll, S., & Trent, J. (2004). Mental retardation in America: A historical reader (History of Disability Series). New York: New York University Press.
Oliva, P. F. (1982). Developing the curriculum. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Olson, A., Leko, M., & Roberts, C. (2016). Providing students with severe disabilities access to the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 41, 143-157. doi:10.1177/1540796916651975
Östlund, D. (2012). The contextual conditions for participation, educational practice in five special schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Malmö University, Sweden).
Östlund, D. (2015). Students with profound and multiple disabilities in education in Sweden: teaching organisation and modes of student participation. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2, 148-164. doi:10.1080/23297018.2015.1085327
Pelka, F. (2012). What we have done: An oral history of the disability rights movement. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Reese, L., Richards-Tutor, C., Hansuvadha, N., Pavri, S., & Xu, S. (2018). Teachers for inclusive, diverse urban settings. Issues in Teacher Education, 27(1), 17-27. Retrieved from
Rivera, C., Jiménez, B., Baker, J., Spies, T., Mims, P., & Ginevra, C. (2016). A culturally and linguistically responsive framework for improving academic and postsecondary outcomes of students with moderate or severe intellectual disability. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 35(2), 23-48. Retrieved from
Ryndak, D. L., Moore, M. A., & Orlando, A. (2008). Access to the general curriculum: The mandate and role of context in research-based practice for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33, 199-213. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.199
Ryndak, D. L., Ward, T., Alper, S., Storch, J., & Montgomery, J. (2010). Long-term outcomes of services in inclusive and self-contained settings for siblings with comparable significant disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 38-53. Retrieved from the Council on Exceptional Children website:
Samuels, C., & Harwin, A. (2018, December 5). Shortage of special educators adds to classroom pressures. Education Week. Retrieved from
Sanford, A., Brown, J., & Turner, M. (2012). Enhancing instruction for English learners in response to intervention systems: The PLUSS model. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 13, 56-70. Retrieved from
Scott, L., Thoma, C., Puglia, L., Temple, P., & D’Aguilar, A. (2017). Implementing a UDL framework: A study of current personnel preparation practices. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55, 25-36. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-55.1.25
SFS 1967:940. (1967). Lagen angående omsorger om vissa psykiskt utvecklingsstörda [Law on care for some groups of people with intellectual disability].
SFS 2010:800: Skollag [Education Act]. Accessed 3 December 2019.
Shogren, K., Luckasson, R., & Schalock, R. (2014). The definition of “context” and its application in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11, 109-116. doi:10.1111/jppi.12077
Shogren, K., McCart, A., Lyon, K., & Sailor, W. (2015). All means all: Building knowledge for inclusive schoolwide transformation. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 40, 173-191. doi:10.1177/1540796915586191
Shogren, K., Wehmeyer, M. L., Seo, H., Thompson, J., Schalock, R., Hughes, C., & Palmer, S. (2017). Examining the reliability and validity of the Supports Intensity Scale–Children’s Version in children with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32, 293-304. doi:10.1177/1088357615625060
Skrtic, T., Sailor, W., & Gee, K. (1996). Voice, collaboration, and inclusion: Democratic themes
in educational and social reform initiatives. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 142-157. doi:10.1177/074193259601700304
Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling, and inclusive education. London, England: Routledge.
Sobul, D. (1995). Specially designed academic instruction in English. Retrieved from
Staub, D., & Peck, C. (1995). What are the outcomes for nondisabled students? Educational Leadership, 52(4), 36-40.
Swedish Government Official Reports. (1948:27). 1946 – års skolkommissions betänkande med förslag till riktlinjer för det svenska skolväsendets utveckling [Guidelines for development of the Swedish school system. Report from the 1946 School Commission]. Stockholm, Sweden: Fritze.
Swedish National Agency for Education (2002). Skolverkets rapport nr 216. I särskola eller grundskola? [Swedish National Agency for Education report no 216. In special school or in compulsory school]Stockholm: Liber.Swedish National Agency for Education. (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare. Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
Swedish National Agency of Education (2019). PM – Pedagogisk personal i skola och vuxenutbildning läsåret 2018/19 [PM – Staff in schools and in education for adults schoolyear 2018/2019]. Diarenummer: 2019:46.
Swedish National Audit Office. (2019). Grundsärskolans kunskapsuppdrag – Styrning, stöd och uppföljning [The knowledge assignment in the CSSID – Steering, support and evaluation]. Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
Swedish Schools Inspectorate. (2010). Undervisningen i svenska i grundsärskolan [The teaching in the Swedish compulsory school for students with intellectual disability]. Quality Review. Report 2010:9. Stockholm, Sweden: Skolinspektionen.
Swedish Schools Inspectorate. (2016). Integrerade elever – Undervisningssituationen för elever som är mottagna i grundsärskolan och får sin undervisning i grundskolan [Integrated pupils – The teaching situation for students who belongs in CSSID and receive their education in a regular primary school]. Diarienummer: 400-2015:6583.
Taub, D., Apgar, J., Foster, M., Ryndak, D. L., Burdge, M., & Letson, S. (2019). Investigating the alignment between English language arts curricula developed for students with significant support needs and the CCSS. Remedial and Special Education. doi:10.1177/0741932519843184
Taub, D., McCord, J., & Ryndak, D. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive
support needs: A context of research-supported practices for all in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 51, 127-137. doi:10.1177/0022466917696263
Teachers Pay Teachers. (2019). Task boxes. Retrieved from
Thompson, J., Walker, V., Shogren, K., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2018). Expanding inclusive educational opportunities for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities through personalized supports. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56, 396-411. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-56.6.396
Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S., Larson, E., Albus, D., Liu, K., & Kwong, E. (2017). Alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities: Participation guidelines and definitions (NCEO Report 406). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
Timberlake, M. T. (2014). Weighing costs and benefits: Teacher interpretation and implementation of access to the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 83-99. doi:10.1177/1540796914544547
Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H., & Muhomba, M. (2009). Alternate assessment: Have we learned anything new? Exceptional Children, 75, 233-252. doi:10.1177/001440290907500206
United Nations. Commission on Human Rights (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child: text of the draft convention as adopted by the Working Group at second reading. [New York]: United Nations.
United Nations General Assembly (2007). Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. Retrieved from
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged; final rule, 68 Federal Registry 236 (December 9, 2003) (codified at 34 C.F.R. pt. 200)
U.S. Department of Education. (2018). 40th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Retrieved from
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Garza, N. (2006). An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Retrieved from the Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research website:
West, J. (2000). Back to school on civil rights: Advancing the federal commitment to leave no child behind. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Retrieved from
World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). World report on disability. Retrieved from
Yilmaz, Z., & Topal, Z. (2014). Connecting mathematical reasoning and language arts skills: The case of Common Core State Standards. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3716-3721. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.829
Young, K. (2008). “I don’t think I’m the right person for that”: Theoretical and institutional questions about a combined credential program. Disability Studies Quarterly, 28(4). doi:10.18061/dsq.v28i4.132