Exploring Formative Feedback in Virtual Primary Education: Towards a Conceptual Structure

Raul Garcia castro; Roxana Rita Perochena Moran; Martín Pedro Llapa Medina

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2026) IEJEE

Exploring Formative Feedback in Virtual Primary Education: Towards a Conceptual Structure

Raul Garcia castro
Roxana Rita Perochena Moran
Martín Pedro Llapa Medina

Published April 25, 2026 | Pages: 349-360 | Views: 83

Download PDF

SHARE

Abstract

Formative feedback is a key resource for promoting learning among primary school students. In virtual environments, it gains greater relevance as it intervenes at different stages of the educational process, highlighting the need to understand how teachers perceive it, apply it, and which factors condition their pedagogical practice. The objective of this study was to understand how primary school teachers conceive and implement formative feedback in virtual contexts and, on that basis, to develop a conceptual structure that synthesizes their experiences. A qualitative exploratory approach was adopted, grounded in grounded theory, which included semi-structured interviews with 65 teachers from 15 educational institutions in the Tacna region of Peru. Data analysis was supported by Atlas.ti 23 software and involved the identification of emerging categories through open, axial, and selective coding processes. The findings indicate that teachers understand feedback as a comprehensive pedagogical process oriented toward formative assessment, progressive improvement of learning, capacity development, and student-centered support. The study also identified that strategies perceived as more effective were those related to interactive and personalized use of diverse resources, whereas less effective strategies were linked to approaches primarily focused on grading. In conclusion, a conceptual structure of virtual formative feedback is proposed, which articulates cognitive, socio-emotional, and techno-pedagogical dimensions. This structure also describes the factors that influence feedback, its types, the purposes attributed by teachers, and the student-centered approach. The study contributes both to the foundations of pedagogical practice and to future research in primary education.

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Formative feedback is a key resource for promoting learning among primary school students. In virtual environments, it gains greater relevance as it intervenes at different stages of the educational process, highlighting the need to understand how teachers perceive it, apply it, and which factors condition their pedagogical practice. The objective of this study was to understand how primary school teachers conceive and implement formative feedback in virtual contexts and, on that basis, to develop a conceptual structure that synthesizes their experiences. A qualitative exploratory approach was adopted, grounded in grounded theory, which included semi-structured interviews with 65 teachers from 15 educational institutions in the Tacna region of Peru. Data analysis was supported by Atlas.ti 23 software and involved the identification of emerging categories through open, axial, and selective coding processes. The findings indicate that teachers understand feedback as a comprehensive pedagogical process oriented toward formative assessment, progressive improvement of learning, capacity development, and student-centered support. The study also identified that strategies perceived as more effective were those related to interactive and personalized use of diverse resources, whereas less effective strategies were linked to approaches primarily focused on grading. In conclusion, a conceptual structure of virtual formative feedback is proposed, which articulates cognitive, socio-emotional, and techno-pedagogical dimensions. This structure also describes the factors that influence feedback, its types, the purposes attributed by teachers, and the student-centered approach. The study contributes both to the foundations of pedagogical practice and to future research in primary education.</span></p>

Listen -

References

Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
Altmann, M., & Arnold, M. (2024). Designing formative feedback in collaborative online international learning. Human Systems Management, 43(5), 605–622. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3233/HSM-230100
Anastasopoulou, A., Sidiropoulos, A., & Karalis, T. (2024). The impact of digital technologies on formative assessment and the learning experience. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1509983. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1509983
Anijovich, R., & Cappelletti, G. (2020). La retroalimentación formativa: Una oportunidad para mejorar los aprendizajes y la enseñanza. Revista Docencia Universitaria, 21(1), 81–96. Recuperado de https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistadocencia/article/view/11327/11606
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Brandmo, C., & Gamlem, S. M. (2025). Students’ perceptions and outcome of teacher feedback: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1572950. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1572950
Brown, G. T. L., Andersson, C., Winberg, M., Palmberg, B., & Palm, T. (2025). Teacher conceptions of assessment and feedback predicting formative feedback practices: Helping students to not ignore improvement-oriented feedback. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2025.2468183
Brown, G., Andersson, C., Winberg, M., & Palm, T. (2023). Predicting formative feedback practices: improving learning and minimising a tendency to ignore feedback. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1241998
Bulut, O., Gorgun, G., & Yildirim-Erbasli, S. N. (2024). The impact of frequency and stakes of formative assessment on student achievement in higher education: A learning analytics study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), e13087. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13087
Casa-Coila, M. D., Yana Salluca, M., Mamani Jilaja, D., Alanoca Gutiérrez, R., & Pérez Argollo, K. (2022). Evaluación formativa en el proceso enseñanza y aprendizaje durante la pandemia COVID-19. Horizontes. Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 6(25), 1729–1741. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v6i25.449
Chand, S. P., & Pillay, K. K. (2024). Understanding the fundamental differences between formative and summative assessment. Global Scientific and Academic Research Journal of Education and Literature, 1(1). https://gsarpublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/GSARJEL052024-Gelary-script.pdf
Green, J. (2023). Primary students’ experiences of formative feedback in mathematics. Education Inquiry, 14(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1995140
Imaicela Vega, R. E., Conza Chuquirima, J. H., Conza Chuquirima, M. E., Jiménez Chuquimarca, K. N., Cango Alejandro, M. C., & Vega Lanchi, M. M. (2025). Estrategias de retroalimentación formativa para potenciar el desempeño escolar. Revista InveCom, 5(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12549650
Kusairi, S. (2020). A web-based formative feedback system using isomorphic items to support physics learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.781
Kuzminykh, A., Ball, T., & Weld, D. S. (2024). Generative AI for scalable formative feedback. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11904
Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2025). Students ignore their mistakes: Elaborated error feedback processing in a digital learning system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 82, 102395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102395
McCarthy, J., Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2025). Clarifying the conceptual terrain of formative assessment and feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 32(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00414-9
Moya-Muñoz, L. D., López-Vélez, C. R., Pérez-Marquin, J. M., & Cedeño-León, M. M. (2025). La retroalimentación formativa como estrategia para mejorar el desempeño en el aula. Revista Científica Zambos, 4(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.69484/rcz/v4/n2/118
Pai, G. (2025). Using formative assessment and feedback from student response systems (SRS) to revise statistics instruction and promote student growth for all. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 33(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2024.2321241
Paz-Perea, M. E., Quiñónez-Tamayo, C. C., Quiñónez-Perlaza, M. I., & Meza-Ganchozo, M. N. (2024). Evaluación formativa y retroalimentación en plataformas digitales. Polo del Conocimiento, 9(9), 2825–2838. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v9i9.8090
Say, R., Visentin, D., Saunders, A., Atherton, I., Carr, A., & King, C. (2023). Where less is more: Limited feedback in formative online multiple‐choice tests improves student self‐regulation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(4), 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12868
Sortwell, A., Trimble, K., Ferraz, R., Geelan, D. R., Hine, G., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Carter-Thuiller, B., Gkintoni, E., & Xuan, Q. (2024). A systematic review of meta-analyses on the impact of formative assessment on K-12 students’ learning: Toward sustainable quality education. Sustainability, 16(17), 7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177826
Steinert, L., Hooshyar, D., & Huttner, F. (2024). RATsApp: An automated feedback system for STEM education. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10531
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia.
Töllner, F., Kuhl, P., & Besser, M. (2025). Formative assessment in inclusive mathematics education in secondary schools: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(5), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050577
Tong, Y., Chen, G., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2025). Video-based analytics-supported formative feedback for enhancing low-achieving students’ conception of collaboration and classroom discourse engagement. Computers & Education, 227, 105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105215
Van der Kleij, F. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2020). Student perceptions of assessment feedback: A critical scoping review and call for research. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(3), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09334-y
Vilca, A. Y., Huarancca, D., Mamani, I., Apaza, E., & Contreras, R. J. (2022). La retroalimentación formativa, un factor clave del aprendizaje matemático en la educación básica primaria. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 6(6), 7274–7288. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i6.3945
Zhang, Y., Liu, X., & Li, M. (2025). SEFL: Synthetic educational feedback with large language models. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12927

Affiliations

Raul Garcia castro

Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann

Roxana Rita Perochena Moran

Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann

Martín Pedro Llapa Medina

Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Garcia castro, R., Perochena Moran, R. R., & Llapa Medina , M. P. (2026). Exploring Formative Feedback in Virtual Primary Education: Towards a Conceptual Structure. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 18(3), 349–360. Retrieved from https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/2600