Understanding by Design (UbD) Model in Mathematics Teaching and its Impact on Students

References

1. Aiym, Y., Galiya, K., Ademi, B., Adilet, M., Kamshat, Z., & Gulmira, K. (2022). Development of the logical thinking of future mathematics teachers through the use of digital educational technologies. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(6), 2001-2012. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7548.
2. Aksu, G. & Koruklu, N. (2015). Determination the effects of vocational high school students' logical and critical thinking skills on mathematics success. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(59), 181-206. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.59.11.
3. Alper, A. & Deryakulu, D. (2008). The effect of cognitive flexibility on students’ achievement and attitudes in web mediated problem based learning. Education and Science, 33(148), 49-63.
4. Altun, S., & Yurtseven, N. (2019). Tasarımcı öğretmen UbD el kitabı (Designer Teacher: Handbook of UbD). Asos Publication.
5. Andrews, D., Lieshout, E. v., & Kaudal, B. B. (2023). How, where, and when do students experience meaningful learning?. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.30722/ijisme.31.03.003.
6. Aristanti, A. P. & Fatayan, A. (2024). The effect of the ubd-based problem based learning model on the critical thinking skills of grade iv students in ipas subject at elementary school. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 11(2), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v11i2.71794.
7. Aslan, E. (1999). Adaptation of Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, Washington D. C: International Conference on Test Adaptation Proceedings. George Town University.
8. Azaryahu, L., Broza, O., Cohen, S., Hershkovitz, S., & Adi-Japha, E. (2023). Development of creative thinking patterns via math and music. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47 (101196), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101196.
9. Basadur, M., Gelade, G., & Basadur, T. (2014). Creative problem-solving process styles, cognitive work demands, and organizational adaptability. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(1), 80–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886313508433.
10. Belay, S., Melesse, S., & Seifu, A. (2022). Elevating teachers’ professional capital: effects of teachers’ engagement in professional learning and job satisfaction, awi district, ethiopia. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094592.
11. Biber, A. Ç. & Bakırcı, D. (2023). The awareness of prospective mathematics teachers on the mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10(3), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.17278/ijesim.1258227.
12. Bilgin, M. (2009). Some variables predicting cognitive flexibility. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 3(36), 142-157. https://doi:10.14687/jhs.v13i3.3975.
13. Bodur, Z. T. & Yurtseven, N. (2021). An investigation of the reflections of UbD-based creative drama activities on students in English lessons. Journal of Education for Life, 35(1), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.20213512.
14. Braem, S. & Egner, T. (2018). Getting a grip on cognitive flexibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418787475.
15. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2013). Scientific research methods. Pegem Academy.
16. Cao, Q., Png, B. T., Cai, Y., Cen, Y., & Xu, D. (2021). Interactive virtual reality game for online learning of science subject in primary schools. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Amp; Education (TALE). https://doi.org/10.1109/tale52509.2021.9678916.
17. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
18. Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2014). The validity and reliability of the cognitive flexibility scale. Education and Science, 39(176), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3466.
19. Çelikman-Hanratty, G. Ç. & Eveyik-Aydın, E. (2023). Designing units with the ubd framework to teach english as a foreign language: Benefits and challenges. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 13(3), 435-455. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1277604.
20. Evans, N. S., Burke, R., Vitiello, V., Zumbrunn, S., & Jirout, J. J. (2023). Curiosity in classrooms: An examination of curiosity promotion and suppression in preschool math and science classrooms. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49(10133), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101333.
21. Fan, M. & Cai, W. (2020). How does a creative learning environment foster student creativity? an examination on multiple explanatory mechanisms. Current Psychology, 41(7), 4667-4676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00974-z.
22. Filiz, T. (2023). Teacher opinions on the process of preparing, implementing, and evaluation of an individualized education program for primary school mathematics courses. The Universal Academic Research Journal, 5(3), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.55236/tuara.1353213.
23. Fisher R. (1995). Teaching children to think. Stanley Thornes.
24. Gabrys, R. L., Tabri, N., Anisman, H., & Matheson, K. (2018). Cognitive control and flexibility in the context of stress and depressive symptoms: The cognitive control and flexibility questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2219). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02219.
25. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915.
26. Gül, M., Altun, S. ve Yücel-Toy, B. (2021). Impact of understanding by design (UbD) on the students cognitive and affective development: A study on the history of revolution and kemalism course. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 51, 123-152. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1678196.
27. Gürbüz, Ö., Kahya-Koçak, F., & Yurtseven, N. (2022). UbD temelli gelişimsel yaklaşım uygulamalarının matematik dersi öğrenci başarısına etkisinin incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.791938.
28. Hayati, R., Asmayanti, A., & Prima, W. (2024). Revitalizing math education: unveiling the impact of holistic mathematics education based “sistem among” in elementary classrooms. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.4926.
29. Huda, N., Wahyuni, T. S., & Fauziyah, F. D. (2021). Students’ perceptions of online mathematics learning and its relationship towards their achievement. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 529, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Social Science (ICONETOS 2020) https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210421.077.
30. Ibrahim, Khalil, I. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2024). Mathematics learning orientation: Mthematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition?. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp253-276.
31. Jung, R. E. (2013). The structure of creative cognition in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(330), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00330.
32. Kalogeratos, G., Anastasopoulou, E., Tsagri, A., Tseremegklis, C., & Asimakopoulou, S. (2023). Enhancing creativity in the school environment. a narrative examination. Technium Education and Humanities, 6, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.47577/teh.v6i.10223.
33. Khotinets, V. & Shishova, E. (2023). Cultural and educational environment in the development of younger schoolchildren’s creative potential. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178535.
34. Kılcan, F. (2005). The Effect of thematic instruction based on the students` achiesements troughout the teaching of measurement at sixth grade of elementary schools. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Marmara University Educational Sciences Institute, İstanbul, Türkiye.
35. Kim, M. K., Roh, I. S., & Cho, M. K. (2016). Creativity of gifted students in an integrated math-science instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.004.
36. Kul, Ü., Çelik, S., & Aksu, Z. (2018). The impact of educational material use on mathematics achievement: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11420a.
37. Lai, Y. H. (2023). Learning efficacy of understanding by design-internet of things (ubd-iot) education integrated with design thinking and computational thinking. Library Hi Tech, 42(2), 730-747. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-01-2023-0002.
38. Lonescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology 30(2), 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001.
39. Martin, M. M. & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76, 623-626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623.
40. McTighe, J., Seif, E., & Wiggins, G. (2004). You can teach for meaning. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 26-30.
41. Misechko, О. & Lytnyova, T. (2022). From critical thinking – to creativity: steps to understanding. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Рedagogical Sciences, 2(109), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.2(109).2022.5-15.
42. Mones, P. & Massonnié, J. (2022). What can you do with a bottle and a hanger? Students with high cognitive flexibility give more ideas in the presence of ambient noise. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46(101116), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101116.
43. Nurjanah, N. E., Yetti, E., & Sumantri, M. S. (2024). Developing creative thinking in preschool children: a comprehensive review of innovative. European Journal of Educational Research, 13, 1303-1319. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1303.
44. Orakcı, Ş. (2021). Exploring the relationships between cognitive flexibility, learner autonomy, and reflective thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(100838), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.10083.
45. Rawlinson, J.G. (1981). Creative thinking and brainstorming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259000.
46. Risnanosanti, R., Susyla, D., Suyuthie, H., Mursalin, M., Naziev, A., Koklu, O., & Salcedo, A. (2023). Development of teacher professionalism in inquiry learning through learning community. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 4(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v4i1.80.
47. Ritter, S. M. & Mostert, N. M. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3.
48. Sari, N. P., Setiawan, M. A., & Makaria, E. C. (2021). Can science develop creativity in early children?. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Proceedings of the 2nd Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium (PSSHERS 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210618.040.
49. Schoenfeld, A.H. (2022). Why are learning and teaching mathematics so difficult?. In Danesi, M. (eds). Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_10-1.
50. Sholihah, F., Inganah, S., & Effendi, M. M. (2017). Analysis of critical thinking skills by homeschooling’s students in solving mathematical problem. Mathematics Education Journal, 1(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v1i2.4628.
51. Som, İ., Türkan, A., & Altun, S. (2016). Design of Introduction to Educational Sciences course using UbD: The evaluation of prospective teachers’ achievement, attitudes and opinions about the course. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2(4), 1341-1351. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.279009.
52. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. A Reading Research and Education Center Report. University of Illinois at Urbana.
53. Stigler, J. & Hiebert, J. (2009). Closing the teaching gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100307.
54. Surya, E., Putri, F. A., & Mukhtar, M. (2017). Improving mathematical problem-solving ability and self-confidence of high school students through contextual learning model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3324.85-94.
55. Taş, S. & Deniz, S. (2018). Prediction concerning the learned helplessness about mathematics of the 8th grade students: Problem-solving skills and cognitive flexibility. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 581-617. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.415087.
56. Tello-Ramos, M. C., Branch, C. L., Kozlovsky, D. Y., Pitera, A. M., & Pravosudov, V. V. (2019). Spatial memory and cognitive flexibility trade-offs: to be or not to be flexible, that is the question. Animal Behaviour, 147, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.02.019.
57. Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003.
58. Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking—norms technical manual research edition—verbal tests, forms A and B—figural tests, forms A and B. Personnel Pres. Inc.
59. Torrance, E. P., Ball, O. E. (1984). Torrance tests of creative thinking. streamlined (revised) manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
60. Uçak, S. & Erdem, H. H. (2020). On the skills of 21st century and philosophy of education in terms of searching a new aspect in education. Uşak University Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 76-93. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.690205.
61. Vitale, J. M., Black, J. B., & Swart, M. I. (2014). Applying grounded coordination challenges to concrete learning materials: a study of number line estimation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034098.
62. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
63. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2007). Schooling by design: Mission, action and achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
64. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2011). The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
65. Yurtseven, N. (2016). The investigation of the reflections of action research based Ubd implementations on teachers and students in EFL teaching (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Yıldız Technical University Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul, Türkiye.

Keywords

Understanding by design, creative thinking, cognitive flexibility, learning retention

Affiliations