Unveiling Elementary School Students' Thinking Processes In Conquering The Natural Number Bias
Keywords:
Natural number bias, number sense, number line, Cognitive Task AnalysisAbstract
This study sought to understand how students activate number sense in determining the position of fractions on a number line and identify how the natural number bias and number sense influences students’ thinking processes. The study utilized the Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA), involving four fifth-grade elementary students as the research subjects. The findings from this study suggest that students activate number sense in many ways, i.e. by comprehending the value and denominator of a fraction, dividing the number line into equal parts, and measuring distances based on fractions. However, the natural number bias could hinder students’ number sense, leading to their misunderstanding of the relationship between the fraction value and denominator. This misunderstanding may result in errors in comparing fractions, adding or subtracting fractions, and solving problems involving fractions. This study contributes to understanding the role of number lines in developing students’ number sense and formulating recommendations for mathematics teachers on how to identify and address the natural number bias in students, as well as ways to improve their number sense.
Downloads
References
Barbieri, C. A., Rodrigues, J., Dyson, N., & Jordan, N. C. (2020). Improving fraction understanding in sixth graders with mathematics difficulties: Effects of a number line approach combined with cognitive learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 628. https://doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000384.
Braithwaite, D. W., & Siegler, R. S. (2018). Developmental changes in the whole number bias. Developmental Science, 21(2), e12541. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12541.
Christou, K. P., Pollack, C., Van Hoof, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Natural number bias in arithmetic operations with missing numbers–a reaction time study. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 6(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i1.228.
Clark, R. E., Feldon, D., vanMerrienboer, J., Yates, K, and Early, S. (In Press for August2007). Cognitive Task Analysis. In Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., van Merriënboer, J. J.G., & Driscoll, M. P. (Eds.) Handbook of research on educational communications andtechnology (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.
Daker, R. J., & Lyons, I. M. (2018). Numerical and non-numerical predictors of first graders’ number-line estimation ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02336.
Deliyianni, E., Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., & Panaoura, A. (2016). Representational flexibility and problem-solving ability in fraction and decimal number addition: A structural model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-015-9625-6
Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., & Borjas, S. (2015). Benefits of “concreteness fading” for children’s mathematics understanding. Learning and Instruction, 35, 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2014.10.004.
Getenet, S., & Callingham, R. (2021). Teaching interrelated concepts of fraction for understanding and teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00275-0.
González-Forte, J. M., Fernández, C., Van Hoof, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Various ways to determine rational number size: An exploration across primary and secondary education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(3), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00440-w.
González-Forte, J. M., Fernández, C., Van Hoof, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2022a). Profiles in understanding operations with rational numbers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1882287
González-Forte, J. M., Fernández, C., Van Hoof, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2022b). Profiles in understanding operations with rational numbers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1882287.
Judd, N., & Klingberg, T. (2021). Training spatial cognition enhances mathematical learning in a randomized study of 17,000 children. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1548–1554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01118-4.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Don’t Blink! The Hazards of Confidence.”. New York Times, 19.
Iuculano, T., & Butterworth, B. (2011). Understanding the real value of fractions and decimals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2088-2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.604785.
Mazzocco, M. M. M., Myers, G. F., Lewis, K. E., Hanich, L. B., & Murphy, M. M. (2013). Limited knowledge of fraction representations differentiates middle school students with mathematics learning disability (dyscalculia) versus low mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.01.005.
Merriënboer, J. J. G. van. (2010). Innovatief onderwijs ontwerpen in het gezondheidsdomein. Maastricht University.
Meert, G., Grégoire, J., & Noël, M. (2010). Comparing the magnitude of two fractions with common components: which representations are used by 10- and 12-year-olds?. Journal of experimental child psychology, 107 3, 244-59 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.008.
Michaelidou, E., & Gagatsis, A. (2005). The geometrical model of number line as a representation of equivalence and addition of fractions.
Namkung, J. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2016). Cognitive predictors of calculations and number line estimation with whole numbers and fractions among at-risk students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 214. https://doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000055.
Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3.
Obersteiner, A., Hoof, J. Van, Verschaffel, L., & Dooren, W. Van. (2016). Who can escape the natural number bias in rational number tasks? A study involving students and experts. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12161.
Obersteiner, A., Van Dooren, W., Van Hoof, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). The natural number bias and magnitude representation in fraction comparison by expert mathematicians. Learning and Instruction, 28, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2013.05.003.
Ren, K., & Gunderson, E. A. (2019). Malleability of whole-number and fraction biases in decimal comparison. Developmental Psychology, 55(11), 2263. psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000797.
Schneider, M., Merz, S., Stricker, J., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., & Luwel, K. (2018). Associations of number line estimation with mathematical competence: A meta‐analysis. Child Development, 89(5), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13068.
Schraagen, J. M., Chipman, S. F., & Shalin, V. L. (2000). Cognitive task analysis. Psychology Press.
Siegler, R. S., & Pyke, A. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1994-2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031200.
Stalmeijer, R. E., McNaughton, N., & Van Mook, W. N. K. A. (2014). Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Medical Teacher, 36(11), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165.
Sun, X. H., Xin, Y. P., & Huang, R. (2019). A complementary survey on the current state of teaching and learning of Whole Number Arithmetic and connections to later mathematical content. ZDM, 51, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-019-01041-Z.
Vamvakoussi, X., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). Naturally biased? In search for reaction time evidence for a natural number bias in adults. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATHB.2012.02.001.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Pearson.
Van Hoof, J., Janssen, R., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Inhibiting natural knowledge in fourth graders: towards a comprehensive test instrument. ZDM, 47(5), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-014-0650-7.
Van Hoof, J., Verschaffel, L., De Neys, W., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Intuitive errors in learners’ fraction understanding: A dual-process perspective on the natural number bias. Memory & Cognition, 48, 1171–1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01045-1.
Woods, D. M., Ketterlin Geller, L., & Basaraba, D. (2018). Number sense on the number line. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(4), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217712971
