Determinant Factors of Scientific Literacy in Elementary School Science Learning

References

1. Abu Bakar, M. R., Halim, L., & Mohamad Arsad, N. (2023). Factor Influencing Students’ Scientific Literacy: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/20393
2. Adriyawati, A., Utomo, E., Rahmawati, Y., & Mardiah, A. (2020). STEAM-Project-Based Learning Integration to Improve Elementary School Students’ Scientific Literacy on Alternative Energy Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080523
3. Aiman, U., Hasyda, S., & Uslan, U. (2020). The Influence of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Model Assisted by Realia Media to Improve Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking Skill of Primary School Students. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-9-2020(volume-9-issue-4-october-2020), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1635
4. Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2019). PLS-SEM in Information Systems Research: A Comprehensive Methodological Reference (pp. 644–653). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99010-1_59
5. Aksu, N., Aksu, G., & Saracaloglu, S. (2023). Prediction of the Factors Affecting PISA Mathematics Literacy of Students from Different Countries by Using Data Mining Methods. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(5), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.267
6. Almeida, B., Santos, M., & Justi, R. (2023). Aspects and Abilities of Science Literacy in the Context of Nature of Science Teaching. Science & Education, 32(3), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00324-4
7. Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary Science Teaching. In Handbook of Research on Science Education. Routledge.
8. Aristeidou, M., & Herodotou, C. (2020). Online Citizen Science: A Systematic Review of Effects on Learning and Scientific Literacy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.224
9. Asano, R., Amponsah, K. D., Baah-Yanney, O., Quarcoo, F., & Azumah, D. A. (2021). Using Quality Teaching and Learning Resources for Effective Integrated Science Education among Senior High Schools in Ghana. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.317
10. Atta, H. B., Vlorensius, Aras, I., & Ikhsanudin. (2020). Developing an instrument for students scientific literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012019
11. Ayu, Rr. F. K., Jannah, Z., Fauziah, N., Ningsih, T. N., Manilaturrohmah, M., Suryadi, D. A., Budiarti, R. P. N., & Fitriyah, F. K. (2021). Planetarium Glass Based on Augmented Reality to Improve Science Literacy Knowledge in Madura Primary Schools. Child Education Journal, 3(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.33086/cej.v3i1.1768
12. Bahtiar, B., Ibrahim, I., & Maimun, M. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Scientific Literacy Skill in terms of Gender Using Science Teaching Materials Discovery Model Assisted by PhET Simulation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.37279
13. Bajpai, S., & Bajpai, R. (2014). Goodness of measurement: reliability and validity. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 3(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2013.191120133
14. Balnaves, M., & Caputi, P. (2018). Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods: An Investigative Approach. SAGE Publications.
15. Bennett, J. (2010). Teaching and Learning Science: A Guide to Recent Research and Its Applications. Continuum.
16. Booth, A. E., Shavlik, M., & Haden, C. A. (2020). Parents’ causal talk: Links to children’s causal stance and emerging scientific literacy. Developmental Psychology, 56(11), 2055–2064. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001108
17. Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20462
18. Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., & Hu, J. (2021). Discrimination of the Contextual Features of Top Performers in Scientific Literacy Using a Machine Learning Approach. Research in Science Education, 51(S1), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9835-y
19. Christina Ismaniati, & Baroroh Iskhamdhanah. (2023). Development of Interactive E-Modules to Increase Learning Motivation and Science Literacy in Elementary School Students. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.2699
20. Darling-Hammond, L., & Cook-Harvey, C. M. (2018). Educating the Whole Child: Improving School Climate to Support Student Success. Learning Policy Institute.
21. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
22. El Islami, R. A. Z., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Comparative study of scientific literacy: Indonesian and Thai pre-service science teachers report. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20355
23. Ferrell, B., & Barbera, J. (2015). Analysis of students’ self-efficacy, interest, and effort beliefs in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00152D
24. Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
25. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
26. Hanifha, S., Erna, M., Noer, A. M., & Talib, C. A. (2023). Scientific Literacy and Environmental Awareness through Undergraduate Student Worksheets Based on Socioscientific Issues. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(4), 504–513. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i4.45817
27. Harlen, W. (2003). Making Progress in Primary Science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464878
28. Harlen, W., & Qualter, A. (2018). The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools. David Fulton Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398907
29. Haryadi, R., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). The Science Literacy Capabilities Profile Using Guided Inquiry Learning Models. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.06109
30. Hastuti, P. W., Setianingsih, W., & Anjarsari, P. (2020). How to develop students’ scientific literacy through integration of local wisdom in Yogyakarta on science learning? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 012108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012108
31. Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
32. Heliawati, L., Lidiawati, L., Adriansyah, P. N. A., & Herlina, E. (2022). Ethnochemistry-based Adobe Flash Learning Media Using Indigenous Knowledge to Improve Students’ Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.34859
33. Hidayat, R., & Patricia Wulandari. (2022). Data Analysis Procedures with Structural Equation Modelling (SEM): Narrative Literature Review. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, 5(6), 859–865. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v5i6.142
34. Huang, C.-Y., Chou, Y.-Y., Chen, C.-H., & Tsai, Y.-H. (2022). Applying Activity System-Based Process Model in Augmented Reality-Based Learning for Natural Science Course in Elementary School. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9579766
35. Huang, P.-S., Chiu, P.-S., Huang, Y.-M., Zhong, H.-X., & Lai, C.-F. (2020). Cooperative Mobile Learning for the Investigation of Natural Science Courses in Elementary Schools. Sustainability, 12(16), 6606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166606
36. Huang, S.-Y., Kuo, Y.-H., & Chen, H.-C. (2020). Applying digital escape rooms infused with science teaching in elementary school: Learning performance, learning motivation, and problem-solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100681
37. Hughes, M. T., & Braun, G. (2019). Experiential Learning Experiences to Enhance Preservice Special Educators’ Literacy Instruction. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019155341
38. Jampel, I. N., Fahrurrozi, F., Artawan, G., Widiana, I. W., Parmiti, D. P., & Hellman, J. (2018). Studying Natural Science in Elementary School Using NOS-Oriented Cooperative Learning Model with the NHT Type. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.9863
39. Kähler, J., Hahn, I., & Köller, O. (2020). The development of early scientific literacy gaps in kindergarten children. International Journal of Science Education, 42(12), 1988–2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1808908
40. Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and Using Multiple Models to Promote Scientific Literacy in the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues. Science & Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
41. Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017a). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378
42. Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017b). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378
43. Koyuncu, İlhan, & Fırat, T. (2021). Investigating Reading Literacy in PISA 2018 Assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189
44. Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2018). Teaching Science in Elementary and Middle School. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315205014
45. Kutlu-Abu, N., Bozgün, K., & Uluçinar-Sağir, Ş. (2024). Studies on scientific literacy in primary education: A bibliometric and content analyses. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2023.00220
46. Kutsyuruba, B., Klinger, D. A., & Hussain, A. (2015). Relationships among school climate, school safety, and student achievement and well‐being: a review of the literature. Review of Education, 3(2), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3043
47. Leguina, A. (2015). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
48. Lestari, H., & Rahmawati, I. (2020). Integrated STEM through Project Based Learning and Guided Inquiry on Scientific Literacy Abilities in Terms of Self-Efficacy Levels. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i1.5883
49. Lo, J.-H., Lai, Y.-F., & Hsu, T.-L. (2021). The Study of AR-Based Learning for Natural Science Inquiry Activities in Taiwan’s Elementary School from the Perspective of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13(11), 6283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116283
50. Masfuah, S., Fakhriyah, F., Wilujeng, I., & Rosana, D. (2021). The Content Validity of Scientific Literacy-Based Diagnostic Assessment. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.099
51. Memon, M. A., T., R., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2021). PLS-SEM Statistical Programs: A Review . Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 5(1), i–xiv. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.5(1)06
52. Nida, S., Rahayu, S., & Eilks, I. (2020). A Survey of Indonesian Science Teachers’ Experience and Perceptions toward Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Education. Education Sciences, 10(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10020039
53. Ni’mah, F. (2019). Research trends of scientific literacy in Indonesia: Where are we? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.20862
54. Nurcahyani, D., Yuberti, Irwandani, Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Mehadi Rahman, Md. (2021). Ethnoscience learning on science literacy of physics material to support environment: A meta-analysis research. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012094
55. Perdana Putra, I. W. D., Gading, I. K., & Dibia, I. K. (2021). Science Learning with VideoScribe-Based Learning Video for Elementary School Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(2), 260. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i2.35883
56. Pramudiyanti, P., Pratiwi, W. O., Armansyah, A., Rohman, F., Putri, I. Y., & Ariani, D. (2023). PBL-Based Student Worksheet to Improve Critical Thinking Ability in Science Learning in Elementary Schools. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i1.17187
57. Primasari, R., Miarsyah, M., & Rusdi, R. (2020). Science literacy, critical thinking skill, and motivation: A correlational study. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11124
58. Pujawan, I. G. N., Rediani, N. N., Antara, I. G. W. S., Putri, N. N. C. A., & Bayu, G. W. (2022). Revised Bloom Taxonomy-Oriented Learning Activities to Develop Scientific Literacy and Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.34628
59. Queiruga-Dios, M. Á., López-Iñesta, E., Diez-Ojeda, M., Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., & Vázquez Dorrío, J. B. (2020). Citizen Science for Scientific Literacy and the Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals in Formal Education. Sustainability, 12(10), 4283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283
60. Rorimpandey, W. H. F., Maaluas, F., Mangangantung, J., & Suryanto, H. (2022). The Student Teams Achievement Divisions Learning Model in Its Influence on the Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes of Elementary School Students. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.72
61. Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setianingsih, W., & Setyawarno, D. (2020). Developing Assessment Instruments of PISA Model to Measure Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Scientific Literacy in Junior High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.17468
62. Rusmansyah, R., Leny, L., & Sofia, H. N. (2023). Improving Students’ Scientific Literacy and Cognitive Learning Outcomes through Ethnoscience-Based PjBL Model. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v4i1.382
63. Saleh, M. (2021). Teaching Supervision: Educators and Learning Quality. Ausy Media.
64. Salkind, N. J. (2010). Ex Post Facto Study. In Encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Publications.
65. Saraswati, Y., Sifak Indana, & Elok Sudibyo. (2021). Science Literacy Profile of Junior High School Students Based on Knowledge, Competence, Cognitive, and Context Aspects. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i3.118
66. Sarstedt, M., & Cheah, J.-H. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: a software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7(3), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-019-00058-3
67. Shaffer, J. F., Ferguson, J., & Denaro, K. (2019). Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3), ar31. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238
68. Shernoff, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., & Sinha, S. (2017). The influence of the high school classroom environment on learning as mediated by student engagement. School Psychology International, 38(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316666413
69. Sholahuddin, A., Anjuni, N., Leny, L., & Faikhamta, C. (2023). Project-Based and Flipped Learning in the Classroom: A Strategy for Enhancing Students’ Scientific Literacy. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-12-2023(volume-12-issue-1-january-2023), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.239
70. Sholikah, L., & Pertiwi, F. N. (2021). Analysis of Science Literacy Ability of Junior High School Students Based on Program For International Student Assessment (PISA). INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 2(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v2i1.2922
71. Sun, Y.-K., & Chan, M.-H. (2024). Pathways to early science literacy: investigating the different role of language and reading skills in science literacy among early primary school children. International Journal of Science Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2335671
72. Suwono, H., Maulidia, L., Saefi, M., Kusairi, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2022). The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505
73. Syofyan, H., & Ratih, R. (2022). Honesty and Motivational Character Analysis of Science Learning Achievement. Pedagonal : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v6i2.5792
74. Tarwiyani, T., Ibrohim, & Mahanal, S. (2020). The influence of science learning based on inquiry integrated with nature of science (NOS) towards students’ attitudes and interests in science. 030020. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000633
75. Tas, Y., Subaşı, M., & Yerdelen, S. (2019). The role of motivation between perceived teacher support and student engagement in science class. Educational Studies, 45(5), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509778
76. Teo, T. (2014). Handbook of quantitative methods for educational research. Sense Publishers.
77. Tuan, H., Chin, C., & Shieh, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737
78. van Rooij, E. C. M., Jansen, E. P. W. A., & van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (2017). Factors that contribute to secondary school students’ self-efficacy in being a successful university student. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 22(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2017.1381301
79. Van Vo, D., & Csapó, B. (2022). Exploring students’ science motivation across grade levels and the role of inductive reasoning in science motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(3), 807–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00568-8
80. Wahyu, Y., Suastra, I. W., Sadia, I. W., & Suarni, N. K. (2020). The Effectiveness of Mobile Augmented Reality Assisted STEM-Based Learning on Scientific Literacy and Students’ Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13324a
81. Wen, C.-T., Liu, C.-C., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Yang, C.-W., & Hwang, F.-K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
82. Widodo, W., Sudibyo, E., Suryanti, S., Sari, D. A. P., Inzanah, I., & Setiawan, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of Gadget-Based Interactive Multimedia in Improving Generation Z’s Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23208
83. Winarni, E. W., Hambali, D., & Purwandari, E. P. (2020). Analysis of Language and Scientific Literacy Skills for 4th Grade Elementary School Students through Discovery Learning and ICT Media. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13215a
84. Zulherman, Z., Amirulloh, G., Purnomo, A., Aji, G. B., & Supriansyah, S. (2021). Development of Android-Based Millealab Virtual Reality Media in Natural Science Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18218

Keywords

internal factors, external factors, science learning, science literacy

Affiliations