Bar, V., & Galili, I. (1994). Stages of children's views about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 157-174.
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., Shouse, A. W., National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Science Learning Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Science Education & National Research Council (U.S.) (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Flavell, J. H. ( 2000 ). Development of children’s knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 15–23.
Gobert, J., & Buckley, B. (2000). Special issue editorial: Introduction to model-based teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894.
Goldberg, F., & Bendall, S. (1995). Making the invisible visible: A teaching/learning environment that builds on a new view of the physics learner. American Journal of Physics 63(11), 978-991.
Jose, T. J. & Williamson, V. M. (2005). Molecular visualization in science education: An evaluation of the NSF funded workshop. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(6), 937-943.
Klausmeier, H. J. (1992). Concept learning and concept teaching. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 267. Larkin, J., & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
Mandler, J. M. (2008). On the birth and growth of concepts. Philosophical Psychology, 21(2), 207-230.
Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dualcoding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 484-490.
Mayer, R.E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390-397.
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 256-265.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better?Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43.
Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
National Research Council (U.S.) (1996). National science education standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Project 2061 (American Association for the Advancement of Science) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 373-404.
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2010). Effects of an integrated instructional model for accelerating student achievement in science and reading comprehension in grades 1-2. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 114–121.
Shwartz, Y., Weizman, A., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., & Reiser, B. (2008). Middle school science curriculum: Coherence as a design principle. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching.
Slotta, J. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). The impact of ontology training on conceptual change: Helping students understand the challenging topics in science. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 261-289.
Stein, N. L., Hernandez, M. W., & Anggoro, F. K. (2010). A theory of coherence and complex learning in the physical sciences: What works (and what doesn't). In N. L. Stein & S. W. Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental science goes to school. New York: Taylor and Francis, Inc.
Stein, N. L., Hernandez, M. W., Anggoro, F. K., & Hedberg, E. (under review). A developmental study of physical science learning: Modeling invisible processes and starting early.
Stein, N. L., & Levine, L. J. (1989). The causal organization of emotional knowledge: A developmental study. Cognition & Emotion, 3(4), 343-378.
Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1993). A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory, and reasoning. Argumentation, 7, 183-204.
Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1982). What's in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology, 2, 212-267. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In Block, C.C. & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176-200). New York: The Guilford Press.
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. W. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Trabasso, T., & Stein, N. L. (1997). Narrating, representing, and remembering event sequences. In P. W. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 237-270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lozano, S., MacKenzie, R., & Morrison, J. (2008). Enriching animations. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
Winston, P. (1986). Learning by augmenting rules and accumulating censors. In R. S. Michalski, Carbonell, J. G., & Mitchell, T. M. (Ed.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.