Elementary Children’s Retrodictive Reasoning about Earth Science


Julie C. LIBARKIN, Matthew H. SCHNEPS


Abstract

We report on interviews conducted with twenty-one elementary school children (grades 1-5) about a number of Earth science concepts. These interviews were undertaken as part of a teacher training video series designed specifically to assist elementary teachers in learning essential ideas in Earth science. As such, children were interviewed about a wide array of earth science concepts, from rock formation to the Earth’s interior. We analyzed interview data primarily to determine whether or not young children are capable of inferring understanding of the past based on present-day observation (retrodictive reasoning) in the context of Earth science. This work provides a basis from which curricula for teaching earth and environmental sciences can emerge, and suggests that new studies into the retrodictive reasoning abilities of young children are needed, including curricula that encourage inference of the past from modern observations.


Keywords

Earth Science, Reasoning, Retrodiction.

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic EU Education Programs
Pages 47 - 62
Issue IEJEE, Volume 5, Issue 1, Special Issue Learning and Instruction in the Natural Sciences
Date of acceptance 01 October 2012
Read (times) 673
Downloaded (times) 301

Author(s) Details

Julie C. LIBARKIN

Michigan State University, United States


Matthew H. SCHNEPS

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,, United States


References

Argow, B., Reilly, J., & Schneps, M. (2004). Essential science for teachers: Earth and space science. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Science Media Group.

Ault, C. R. (1982). Time in geological explanations as perceived by elementary-school students. Journal of Geological Education, 30(5), 304–09.

Ault, C. R. (1984). The everyday perspective and exceedingly unobvious meaning. Journal of Geological Education, 32(2), 89–91.

Ault, C. R. (1998). Criteria of excellence for geological inquiry: The necessity of ambiguity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 189–212.

Barrow, L., & Haskins, S. (1996). Earthquake knowledge and experiences of introductory geology students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26(2), 143–46.

Blake, A. (2005). Do young children’s ideas about the Earth’s structure and processes reveal underlying patterns of descriptive and causal understanding in earth science? Research in Science &Technological Education, 23(1), 59–74. 0

Cheek, K. A. (2010). Commentary: A summary and analysis of twenty-seven years of geoscience conceptions research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(3), 122–134.

Dahl, J., Anderson, S. W., & Libarkin, J. C. (2005). Digging into Earth Science: Alternative conceptions held by K-12 teachers. Journal of Science Education, 12, 65–68.

Dal, B. (2007). How do we help students build beliefs that allow them to avoid critical learning barriers and develop a deep understanding of geology? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 251–269.

DeLaughter, J. E., Stein, S., Stein, C. A., & Bain, K. R. (1998). Preconceptions abound among students in an introductory earth science course. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 79(36), 429–432.

Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geologic time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 415–442.

Dove, J. E. (1998). Students’ alternative conceptions in Earth science: a review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Research Papers in Education, 13(2), 183–201.

Gosselin, D. C., & Macklem-Hurst, J. L. (2002). Pre-/post-knowledge assessment of an earth science course for elementary/middle school education majors. Journal of Geoscience Education, Papers in Natural Resources, 50(2), 169–175.

Happs, J. C. (1984). Soil genesis and development: Views held by New Zealand students. Journal of Geography, 83(4), 177–180.

Kali, Y., Orion, N., & Eylon, B.-S. (2003). Effect of knowledge integration activities on students’ perception of the earth’s crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 545–565.

King, C. (2008). Geoscience education: an overview. Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 187–222.

Kortz, K. M., & Murray, D. P. (2009). Barriers to college students learning how rocks form. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(4), 300–315.

Kusnick, J. (2002). Growing pebbles and conceptual prisms - Understanding the source of student misconceptions about rock formation. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(1), 31–39.

Lawton, J. (2001). Earth System Science. Science, 292(5524), 1965–1965. doi:10.1126/science.292.5524.1965

Lewis, E. B., & Baker, D. R. (2009). A call for a new geoscience education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 121-129.

Libarkin, J., Anderson, S., Dahl, J., Beilfuss, M., Boone, W., & Kurdziel, J. (2005). College students’ ideas about geologic time, Earth’s interior, and Earth’s crust. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 17–26.

Libarkin, J. C., & Kurdziel, J. P. (2006). Ontology and the teaching of earth system science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(3), 408.

Lillo, J. (1994). An analysis of the annotated drawings of the internal structure of the Earth made by students aged 10–15 from primary and secondary schools in Spain. Teaching Earth Science, 19, 83–87.

Marques, L., & Thompson, D. (1997). Misconceptions and conceptual changes concerning Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics among Portuguese students aged 16‐17. Research in Science &Technological Education, 15(2), 195–222.

Montangero, J. (1996). Understanding Changes In Time: The Development Of Diachronic Thinking In 7-12 Year Old Children. Taylor & Francis.

Muthukrishna, N., Carnine, D., Grossen, B., & Miller, S. (1993). Children’s alternative frameworks: Should they be directly-addressed in science instruction? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 233–248.

Nelson, B. D., Aron, R. H., & Francek, M. A. (1992). Clarification of selected misconceptions in physical geography. Journal of Geography, 91(2), 76–80.

Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89(4), 535–563.

Pyle, E. J. (2008). A model of inquiry for teaching Earth Science. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7770

Ross, K. E. K., & Shuell, T. J. (1993). Children’s beliefs about earthquakes. Science Education, 77(2), 191–205.

Schoon, K. (1995). The origin and extent of alternative conceptions in the earth and space sciences: A survey of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 7(2), 27–46.

Sunderlin, D. (2009). Integrative mapping of global-scale processes and patterns on “imaginary Earth ”continental geometries: A teaching tool in an Earth History course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(1), 73–81.

Thomson, N., & Chapman Beall, S. (2008). An Inquiry Safari: What can we learn from skulls? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(2), 196–203.

Trend, R. (1998). An investigation into understanding of geological time among 10‐ and 11‐year‐old children. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 973–988.

Trend, R. (2000). Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees, with reference to their engagement with geoscience, history, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 539–555.

Trend, R. D. (2001). Deep time framework: A preliminary study of U.K. primary teachers’ conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geoscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 191–221.

Trend, R., Everett, L., & Dove, J. (2000). Interpreting primary children’s representations of mountains and mountainous landscapes and environments. Research in Science & Technological Education, 18(1), 85–112.

Wiser, M., & Amin, T. (2001). “Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 331–355.

Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), March 2000, 99-149.