How Reading Comprehension is Embodied and Why That Matters



Reading comprehension, much like comprehension of situations and comprehension of oral language, is embodied. In all cases, comprehension is the ability to take effective action on the basis of affordances related to the body, the physical world, and personal goals and cultural norms. In language contexts, action-based comprehension arises from simulating the linguistic content using neural and bodily systems of perception, action, and emotion. Within this framework, a new approach to teaching reading comprehension is described: Teach children how to simulate while reading. The Moved by Reading intervention teaches simulation in two stages. In the first stage, physical manipulation, children manipulate toys to simulate the content of what they are reading. After success in physically manipulating the toys, the children are taught to manipulate the toys in imagination. Research demonstrates that both physical and imagined manipulation leads to large gains in memory and comprehension.


Reading Comprehension, Embodiment, Moved By Reading

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic EU Education Programs
Pages 5 - 18
Issue IEJEE, Volume 4, Issue 1, Special Issue Reading Comprehension
Date of acceptance 01 October 2011
Read (times) 758
Downloaded (times) 329

Author(s) Details


Arizona State University and University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States


Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(04), 577–660.

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 617–645.

Beilock, S. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesture Changes Thought by Grounding It in Action. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1605-1610. doi:10.1177/0956797610385353

Bubic, A., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4.

Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825-850. doi:10.1080/17470210701623605

Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. The Multiple Functions of Sensory-Motor Representations, 22(3/4), 455.

Glenberg, A. M. (2007). Language and action: creating sensible combinations of ideas. In G. Gaskell (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.361-370). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Glenberg, A. M. (2011). Introduction to the Mirror Neuron Forum. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(4), 363-368. doi:10.1177/1745691611412386

Glenberg, A. M, Brown, M., & Levin, J. R. (2007). Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 389–399.

Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2011). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex. doi:10.1016/ j.cortex. 2011. 04.010

Glenberg, A. M., Goldberg, A. B., & Zhu, X. (2009). Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instructional Science, 39(1), 27-39. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9096-7

Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436.

Glenberg, A. M., Jaworski, B., Rischal, M., & Levin, J. R. (2007). What brains are for: Action, meaning, and reading comprehension. Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, 221–240.

Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of highdimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3),379–401.

Glenberg, A., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 905-919. doi:10.1080/ 17470210701625550

Glenberg, A. M., Willford, J., Gibson, B., Goldberg, A., & Zhu, X. (2011). Improving Reading to Improve Math. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1-25. doi:10.1080/ 10888438. 2011.564245

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action’s Influence on Thought: The Case of Gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 664-674. doi:10.1177/ 1745691610388764

Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307.

Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., Gutowski, K. A., Lucarelli, M. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2010). Cosmetic Use of Botulinum Toxin-A Affects Processing of Emotional Language. Psychological Science, 21(7), 895-900. doi:10.1177/0956797610374742

Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495-514. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.495

Kaschak, M. P, & Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 508–529.

Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2011). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006

Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2010). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/a0021446

Marley, S. C, Levin, J. R, & Glenberg, A. M. (2007). Improving Native American children’s listening comprehension through concrete representations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 537–550.

Marley, S. C., Szabo, Z., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2011). Investigation of an Activity-Based Text-Processing Strategy in Mixed-Age Child Dyads. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(3), 340-360. doi:10.1080/00220973.2010.483697

Marley, S., Levin, J., & Glenberg, A. (2010). What Cognitive Benefits Does an Activity-Based Reading Strategy Afford Young Native American Readers? The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(3), 395-417. doi:10.1080/00220970903548061

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169-192. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Glenberg, A. M., Kaschak, M. P., Mueller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2010). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Contributions to Understanding Sentences Describing Objects in Motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. doi:10.3389/ fpsyg.2010. 00183

Santana, E., & de Vega, M. (2011). Metaphors are Embodied, and so are Their Literal Counterparts. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00090

Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1-11.