Fifth Graders’ Enjoyment, Interest, and Comprehension of Graphic Novels Compared to Heavily-Illustrated and Traditional Novels


Kimberly Ann JENNINGS, Audrey C. RULE, Sarah M. Vander ZANDEN


Abstract

The comparative effectiveness of graphic novels, heavily illustrated novels, and traditional novels as reading teaching tools has been sparsely researched. During the 2011-2012 school year, 24 mixed-ability fifth grade students chose to read six novels: two traditional novels, two highly illustrated novels and two graphic novels. Students participated in discussion groups structured with thinking skills, and completed assignments during and after reading the books. Student comprehension and enjoyment were measured by rubric-graded assignments and rating scales. The numbers of student responses during discussions per type of novel were tabulated. The graphic novel received the highest scores in all categories. The researchers conclude that graphic novels be considered an engaging and effective method of teaching reading to fifth graders.


Keywords

Graphic Novels, Comprehension

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic Environmental Education
Pages 257 - 274
Issue IEJEE, Volume 6, Issue 2
Date of acceptance 01 March 2014
Read (times) 635
Downloaded (times) 389

Author(s) Details

Kimberly Ann JENNINGS

Wales Elementary School, Wales, United States, United States


Audrey C. RULE

University of Northern Iowa, United States, United States


Sarah M. Vander ZANDEN

University of Northern Iowa, United States, United States


References

Abbott, T. (1999). The Secrets of Droon: The Magic Staircase. New York: Scholastic.

Allington, R. (2011). What really matters for struggling readers, 3rd Ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.

Babbit, N. (1975). Tuck Everlasting. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Barack, M., & Doppelt, Y. (1999). Integrating the Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) programme for creative thinking into a project-based technology curriculum. Research in Science and Technological Education,17(2), 139–151.

Bosma, K., Rule, A. C., & Krueger, K. S. (2013). Memorable, enjoyable reading about American Revolution with graphic novels. Social Studies Research and Practice, 8 (1).

Briggs, S. R. (2010). Using Literature Circles to Increase Reading Comprehension in Third Grade Elementary Students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 511 091.

Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G. & Topping, K. (2010). Engagement in Reading: Lessons Learned from Three PISA Countries. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51, 304-315.

Certo,J., Moxley, K., Reffitt, K., & Miller, J. (2010). I Learned How to Talk About a Book: Children's Perceptions of Literature Circles Across Grade and Ability Levels. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(3),

Clay, M. (2000). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cronin, D. (2000). Click, Clack, Moo Cows That Type. New York, NY. Simon & Schuster Children’s Publishing Division.

Dahl, R. (1984). The BFG. New York: Puffin Books.

Daniels, H. (1994) Literature Circles: Voice and Choice in the Student-Centered Classroom. York, ME: Stenhouse.

de Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York, NY: Harper and Row Publishers

Edwards, B. (2009). Motivating middle school learners: The graphic novel link. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 25(8), 56-58.

Guthrie, J.T. (2001). Contexts for engagement and motivation in reading. Reading Online, 4(8). Available: http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/handbook/guthrie/inde x.html

Jewett, C. (2008) Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms, Review of Research in Education. 32(1)241-267.

Juster, N. (1961). The Phantom Tollbooth. New York: Random House, Inc.

Kibuishi, K. (2008). Amulet: Book One: The Storekeeper. New York: Graphix.

Kinney, J. (2007). Diary of a Wimpy Kid. New York, NY: Amulet Books, 2007.

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY: Routledge

Lavin, M.R. (1998). Comic books and graphic novels for libraries: What to buy. Serials Review, 24(2), 31–46.

Lyga, A., & Lyga, B. (2004). Graphic novels in your media center: A definitive guide. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited

Martin, A. (2009). Graphic novels in the classroom. Library Media Connection, 28(2), 30-31.

Martin, A., & Godwin, L. (2002). The Doll People. New York: Hyperion Books for Children.

Matthews, S (2011). Framing preservice teachers’ interpretations of graphic novels in the social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education, 39(3), 416-446.

Melchior, T. M., Kaufold, R. E., & Edwards, E. (1988). How schools teach thinking: Using CoRT thinking in schools. Educational Leadership, 45 (7), 32–33.

Michalski, R. (2005). Forward thinking, sideways. C M A Management, 79(2), 20.

Mills, H. & Jennings, L. (2011) Talking about Talk: Reclaiming he Value and Power of Literature Circles. Reading Teacher, 64(8), 590-598. doi:10.1595/RT.64.8.4

Muth, J. (2002). The Three Questions. New York, NY: Scholastic Press.

O’English, L. Matthews, J. G., & Lindsay, E. B. (2006). Graphic novels in academic libraries: From Maus to manga and beyond. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 173-182.

Paulsen, G. (1996). Brian’s Winter. New York: Random House.

Peterson, S. , & Belizaire, M. (2006). Another look at roles in literature circles. Middle School Journal, 37(4), 37-43.

Pilkey, D. (1997). The Adventures of Captain Underpants. New York, NY: The Blue Sky Press.

Ruckman, I. (1984). Night of the Twisters. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Corp.

Rule, A. C., & Barrera, M. T., III. (2008). Three authentic curriculum-integration approaches to bird adaptations that incorporate technology and thinking skills. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 501247.

Rule, A. C., & Barrera, M. T., III, (2006). CoRT thinking skills guide PBL science. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(4), 145-149.

Rule, A. C., & Stefanich, G. P. (2012). Using a Thinking Skills System to Guide Discussions during a Working Conference on Students with Disabilities Pursuing STEM Fields. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(1), 1-12.

Salisbury, K. E., Rule, A. C., & Vander Zanden, S. M. (in review). Performance of high-potential versus identified gifted middleschoolers during a prairie restoration project.

Selznick, B. (2007). The Invention of Hugo Cabret. New York: Scholastic.

Sipe, L. R. (2008). Young children’s visual meaning making in response to picturebooks. Handbook on Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts, 2, 381-392.

Smith, J. (2005). Bone: Out from Boneville. New York: Graphix.

Snowball, C. (2005) Teenage reluctant readers and graphic novels, Young Adult Library Services, 3(4) 43-45.

Telgemeier, R. (2010). Smile. New York: Graphix.

Trabachnick, S. (Ed.). (2009). Teaching the Graphic Novel. New York, NY: The Modern Language Association of America.

Wood, D. (2008). Into the Volcano: A Graphic Novel. New York: The Blue Sky Press.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181.

Related Papers