Understanding Elementary Teachers’ Different Responses to Reform: The Case of Implementation of an Assessment Reform in South Korea


Jinyoung CHOI


Abstract

This study explores how teachers implemented an assessment reform in South Korea, with an analysis of different aspects of the reform. Using a mixed method design, this study reveals that the relation between policy and practice depends upon the nature of the changes that reform policies propose. Teachers’ implementation varies in terms of different aspects of the reform. Teachers struggle with implementing its fundamental aspects. This study suggests that it is important to take into account variation in implementation as the developmental progress of the reform and attend to scaffolding to make teachers further progress toward fundamental changes in practice.


Keywords

Educational policy and practice, Policy implementation, Assessment, Educational change.

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic Elementary Education
Pages 581 - 598
Issue IEJEE, Volume 9, Issue 3
Date of acceptance 13 March 2017
Read (times) 26
Downloaded (times) 16

Author(s) Details

Jinyoung CHOI

Ewha Womans University, Turkey


References

Beck, S. (1998). Theory and practice of performance assessment. Seoul: Wonmisa.

Brian, K., Reid, I., & Boyes, L. C. (2006). Teachers as mediators between educational policy and practice. Educational Studies, 32(4), 411-423, doi:10.1080/03055690600850396

Choi, H. (1998). A study on the way of aligning performance assessment with school curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(1), 45-67.

Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3-12.

Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. (2007). Educational innovation and the problem of scale. In B. Schneider & S-K. McDonald (Eds.). Scale up in principle: Ideas in principle of scale, Volume 1 (pp.19-36). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The Mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294-343.

Common Core Math Standards Initiative. (n.d.). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf

Cuban, L. (1993). How Teachers Taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890-1990. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Cuban, L. (2013). Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 109-125. doi:10.1108/095782313113 04661

Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Levittown, PA: The Falmer Press.

Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2000). The three dimensions of reform. Educational Leadership. 57(7), 30-34.

Joong, P., Xiong, Y., Li, L., & Pan, C. J. (2009). Investigation into the perceptions of students, parents, and teachers in China's education reform in grades 7 and 8. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(3), 141-254.

Jung, M. (2001). Performance-based assessment in social studies. Seoul: Hakmunsa.

Keon, D. (2000). Problems of performance assessment. The Journal of Education Research, 21(2), 83-102.

McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171-178.

McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2(4), 301-323.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Olsen, B., & Kirtman, L. (2002). Teacher as mediator of school reform: An examination of teacher practice in 36 California restructuring schools. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 301-324.

Saxe, G. B., Gearhart, M., Franke, M. L., Howard, S., & Crockett, M. (1999). Teachers' shifting assessment practices in the context of educational reform in mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(1), 85-105.

Shepard, L. A. (2000, February). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning (CSE Technical Report 517). Retrieved from https://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/ TECH517.pdf

Spillane, J. P. (2000). A fifth-grade teacher' reconstruction of mathematics and literacy teaching: Exploring interaction among identity, learning, and subject matter. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 307-330.

Spillane, J. P., & Jennings, N. E. (1997). Aligned instructional policy and ambitious pedagogy: Exploring instructional reform from the classroom perspective. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 449-481.

Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1-27.

Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers' hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Suurtamm, C., & Koch, M. J. (2014). Navigating dilemmas in transforming assessment practices: experiences of mathematics teachers in Ontario, Canada. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(3), 263-287. doi:10.1007/s11092-014-9195-0

The South Korean Ministry of Education. (1997). The 7th elementary school curriculum commentary. Seoul: Daehan Gyogwaseo.

Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.