Do University Students Know How They Perform?


Piergiorgio BATTISTELLI, Alessia CADAMURO, Alessandra FARNETI, Annalisa VERSARI


Abstract

The aim of the research is to study the capacity for self-evaluation of University students undergoing tests involving mathematics, linguistic and formal reasoning. Subjects were asked to estimate the number of correct answers and subsequently to compare their performance with that of their peers. We divided the subjects into three groups on the basis of performance: poor, middle and top performers. The results demonstrate that all the subjects in all tests showed good awareness of their level of actual performance. Analyzing comparative assessments, the results reported in literature by Kruger and Dunning were confirmed: poor performers tend to significantly overestimate their own performance whilst top performers tend to underestimate it. This can be interpreted as a demonstration that the accuracy of comparative self-evaluations depends on a number of variables: cognitive and metacognitive factors and aspects associated with self-representation. Our conclusion is that cognitive and metacognitive processes work as “submerged” in highly subjective representations, allowing dynamics related to safeguarding the image one has of oneself to play a role.


Keywords

Metacognition, Self- Evaluation, Cognitive Performance, University Students, Self- Image

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic EU Education Programs
Pages 180 - 198
Issue IEJEE, Volume 2, Issue 1, Special Issue Metacognition
Date of acceptance 01 October 2009
Read (times) 477
Downloaded (times) 252

Author(s) Details

Piergiorgio BATTISTELLI

University of Bologna, Italy, Italy


Alessia CADAMURO

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy, Italy


Alessandra FARNETI

Libera Università of Bolzano, Italy, Turkey


Annalisa VERSARI

University of Bologna, Italy, Italy


References

Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student’s learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), 260- 267.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freman. Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: Theory or chapter heading? Learning and Individual Differences. 8 (4), 391-402.

Borkowski, J. G. (1985). Sign of intelligence: Strategy generalization and metacognition. In S. R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children, New York: Academic Press.

Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S. & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In G. Schraw (Ed.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1-41). Lincoln, NB: Univ. Of Nebraska Press.

Borkowski, J. G., & Muthukrishna, N. (1995). Learning environments and skill generalization: How contexts facilitate regulatory processes and efficacy beliefs. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development. (pp. 283-300). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanism. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, A. L., & DeLoache, J. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops (pp. 3- 35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Burson, K. A., Larrick, R. P., & Klayman, J. (2006). Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 60-77.

Cadamuro, A. (2004). Stili cognitivi e stili di apprendimento: da quello che pensi a come lo pensi. (Cognitive styles and learning styles: from what you think to how you think). Roma: Carrocci Editore.

Calonghi, L., Polacek, K., & Ronco, A., (1974), Test di Struttura dell'Intelligenza TSI di Rudolf Amthauer Manuale. (Intelligence Structure Test). Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.

Campione, J.C., & Brown, A. L. (1978). Toward a theory of intelligence: Contributions from research with retarded children. Intelligence. 2(3), 279-304.

Cornoldi, C. (1995). Metacognizione e apprendimento. (Metacognition and learning). Bologna: Il Mulino.

De Beni, R., & Moè, A. (2000). Motivazione e apprendimento. (Motivation and learning). Bologna: Il Mulino.

De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (1991). Lettura e metacognizione. (Reading and metacognition). Trento: Erickson.

Dunning, D., Johnson K., Ehrlinger, J. & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83-87.

Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social–cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008). “Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105, 98–121.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In B. Resnichl (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp.231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Monitoring social cognitive enterprises: something else that may develop in the area of social cognition. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds). Social cognitive development (pp. 272-287). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frieze, I. H, Bar Tal, D. (1980). Developmental trends in cue utilization for attributional judgments. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 1 (2), 83-94.

Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., & Wiederholt, J. L. (1998). TINV. Test di intelligenza non verbale (Non verbal intelligence scale). Trento: Erickson.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Oxford, England: John Wiley.

Hultsch, D. F., Herzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Davidson, H. (1988). Memory self-knowledge and self-efficacy in the aged. In M. L. Howe & C. J. Brainered (Eds.), Cognitive development in adulthood. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Izaute, M., & Chambres, P. (2002). Metacognition: process, function and use. Dodrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Kitchener, K.S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition. A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26 (4), 222-232.

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28 (2), 16-26.

Krueger, J., & Mueller, R. A., (2002). Unskilled, unaware or both? The contribution of social-perceptual skills and statistical regression to self-enhancement biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 180-188.

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1121-1134.

Mason, L.(2001). Verità e Certezze. (Truth and certainties). Roma: Carocci.

Mazzoni, G. (2000). L'apprendimento: comportamento, processi cognitivi, neurobiologia. (Learning: behaviour, cognitive processes, neurobiology). Roma: Carocci Editore.

Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology. Monitoring and control processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Moè A., & De Beni R. (1995). Metodo di studio: dalle strategie ai programmi metacognitivi. In O. Albanese, P. A. Doudin & D. Martin (Eds), Metacognizione ed educazione(pp.121-140). (Study methods: from strategies to metacognitive programmes. In Metacognition and education). Milano: Franco Angeli.

Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Prentice Hall, NJ: Englewood Cliffs.

Pearson N. & Wiederholt L. (1998). Test di intelligenza non verbale TINV. ( Non verbal intelligence scale). Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.

Petter, G. (1992). Dall’infanzia alla preadolescenza. (From infancy to pre-adolescence). Firenze: Giunti.

Piaget, J. (1974). Reussir et comprendre. (Succeeding and understanding). Paris : PUF.

Piaget J. (1975). L’équilibration des structures cognitives: problème central du development. Etudes d’épistémologie génétique, vol. 33. (Cognitive structure equilibration: a central problem of development). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Richard, J. F. (1990). Les activitès mentales: comprendre, raisonner, trouver des solutions. Paris : Colin.

Riviére, A. (1999). Teoria della mente e metarappresentazione. In F. Braga Illa (Ed.), Processi di rappresentazione, soggetto e società. (Theory of mind and metarepresentation. Processes of representation, subject and society). Urbino: Edizioni Quattro Venti.

Schwartz, B., & Perfect, T.J (2002). Applied metacognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Vygotskij, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.

Weiner, B., Frieze, I.H., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R.M. (1978). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. Morristown NJ: General Learning Press.

Weiner, B. (1986). Attribution, emotion, and action. In: R. M. Sorrentino, & E. T. Higgins (Eds), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behaviour. (pp. 281-312). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.