Calibration of Comprehension and Performance in L2 Reading



Comprehension monitoring is crucial for successful reading. Although the researchers appreciate the importance of comprehension monitoring in L2 reading, there are only a few studies done on the comprehension monitoring ability of L2 readers. The main aim of this study was to investigate the comprehension monitoring abilities of university students while reading expository texts in L2. The results showed that the students’ were not able to calibrate their comprehension at above chance level whereas they were able to calibrate their performance. The results were discussed comparative to findings from earlier research in L1 reading.



Metacomprehension, Second Language, Calibration

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic EU Education Programs
Pages 167 - 179
Issue IEJEE, Volume 2, Issue 1, Special Issue Metacognition
Date of acceptance 01 October 2009
Read (times) 488
Downloaded (times) 204

Author(s) Details


Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey


Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey


Baker, L., & Brown, A. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research. (ss. 353-394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Begg, I. M., Martin, M. A., & Needham, D. R. (1992). Memory monitoring: How useful is self-knowledge about memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 195- 218.

Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 319-343.

Casanave, C. (1988). Comprehension monitoring in ESL reading: A neglected essential. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 283302.

Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11-28.

Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J.,& Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 12,50-71.

Cromley, J. G. (2005). Metacognition, cognitive strategy instruction, and reading in adult literacy. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 5, 187-204.

Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A.R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228-232.

Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Why Does Rereading Improve Metacomprehension Accuracy? Evaluating the Levels-of-Disruption Hypothesis for the Rereading Effect. Discourse Processes, 40, 37-56.

Dunlosky, J.,& Connor, L. T. (1997). Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 25,691-700

Epstein, W., Glenberg, A. M, & Bradley, M. (1984). Co-activation and comprehension: Contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing. Memory & Cognition,12, 355-360.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(4), 702–718.

Glenberg, A.M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory &Cognition, 15, 84-93.

Glenberg, A.M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (l987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. New York: Longman.

Kimmel, S., & MacGinitie, W.H. (1984). Identifying children who use a perseverative text processing strategy. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 162-172.

Kolic-Vehovec, S., & Bajsanski, I. (2006). Metacognitive strategies and reading comprehension in elementary-school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 439-451.

Lin, L., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345–391.

Lin, L., Moore, D., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2001). An assessment of students’ calibration of comprehension and calibration of performance using multiple measures. Reading Psychology, 22, 111–128.

Lin, L., Zabrucky, K. M., & Moore, D. (2002). Effects of text difficulty and adults’ age on relative calibration of comprehension. American Journal of Psychology,15(2),187- 198.

Maki, R. H. (1995). Accuracy of metacomprehension judgments for questions of varying importance levels. American Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 327-344.

Maki, R. H., Jonas, D., & Kallod, M. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,1, 126–138.

Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don’t understand: A Preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 989-992.

Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgements and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 159-163.

Miesner, M. T., & Maki, R. H. (2007). The role of test anxiety in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 650– 670.

Morrison, L. (2004). Comprehension monitoring in first and second language reading. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 77-106.

Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance and monitoring accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 159-179.

Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 7- 28.

Nietfeld, J. L., Enders, C. K., & Schraw, G. (2006). A Monte Carlo comparison of two measures of monitoring accuracy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 258-271.

Maki, R. H., J. M. Foley, W. K. Kajer, R. C. Thompson, & M.G. Willert. (1990). Increased processing enhances calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 609-616.

Otero, J. C., Campanario, J.M., & Hopkins, K. D. (1992). The relationship between academic achievement and metacognitive comprehension monitoring ability of Spanish secondary school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, pp 419-430.

Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration—An extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 3-31.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41, 219-225. Pressley M, & Schneider W. 1997. Introduction to Memory Development During Childhood and Adolescence. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.

Schraw, G. (2002). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.). Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice. (ss. 3– 16). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.

Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.

Thiede, K.W., & Dunlosky, J. (1994). Delaying students’ metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting the recognition performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 290-302.

Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned from multi-method designs? In: B. Moschner, C. Artelt (Eds.) Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (75-97). Berlin: Waxmann.

Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (1995). Differential effects of instructional support on learning in simulation environments. Instructional Science, 22,363-383.

Weaver, C. A. III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 12–22.

Weaver, C. A. III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition,23, 12-22.

Wiley, J., Griffin, T., & Thiede, K.W. (2005). Putting the Comprehension in Metacomprehension. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 408-428.

Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 408–428.

Zabrucky, K, Agler, L. & Moore, D. (2005). Metacognition in Taiwan: Students’ calibration of comprehension and performance. International Journal of Psychology, 44 (4), 305-312.

Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1994). Contributions of working memory and evaluation and regulation of understanding to adults’ recall of texts. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, 201-212.

Zhao, Q., & Linderholm, T. (2008). Adult metacomprehension: Judgment processes and accuracy constraints. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 191–206.