Self-Regulated Learning Using Multimedia Programs in Dentistry Postgraduate Students: A Multimethod Approach

Miguel LLORET, Estela AGUILAR, Alejandro LLORET


The purpose of this study was to study the effect of a multimedia computing program on the production of activities and self-regulated learning processes in 18 students of the Dentistry postdegree (Celaya, Mexico). A multi-method design (quasi-experimental, pretest-post-test and qualitative: Think aloud protocol) was used. Self-regulated activities were identified with the MSLQ questionnaire. Results of the MSLQ pretest/post-test questionnaire didn't show an intervention effect. In contrast, the qualitative methodology allowed the registration of a high frequency of self-regulated dimensions on the metacognitive area, on the making of inferences (cognitive area), and on the planning time and effort (behavioural area). Our data revealed the usefulness of a qualitative methodology for the understanding of the complex nature of the self-regulatory processes on learning environments based on computers.


Self-Regulated Learning, Multimedia, Multi-Method Design, Metacognition, Postdegree Students

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic EU Education Programs
Pages 101 - 121
Issue IEJEE, Volume 2, Issue 1, Special Issue Metacognition
Date of acceptance 01 October 2009
Read (times) 514
Downloaded (times) 254

Author(s) Details


Universidad Latina de México, Mexico


Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico

Alejandro LLORET

Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico


Aguaded, J. & Cabero, J. (2004). Educar en red. Internet como recurso para la educación. Educating on the network. Internet as a resource for education. Revista Pixel Bit, (22),115-125. Accessed:13.04.09

Aguilar, E. & Viniegra, L. (2003). Atando teoría y práctica en la labor docente. Tying theory and practice in teaching. Ciudad de México, México: Paidós.

Anderson, L. & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom´s taxonomy of educational objectives.New York, USA: Longman.

Area, M. (2002). Elaboración de material didáctico para la world wide web. Creating didactica material for the world wide web. Web docente de tecnología educativa. Universidad de la Laguna. Accessed;10.03.09

Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199-209.

Azevedo, R. (2007). Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: an introduction. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 57-65.

Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological,and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning. 4, 87–95.

Azevedo, R. & Guthrie, J. (2004). The role of self regulated learning in fostering student´s conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing. Research 3, 87-111.

Azevedo, R. & Witherspoon, A. (2009). Self-regulated use of hypermedia. In D.Hacker, J.Dunlosky & A.Graesser, (Eds.).Handbook of metacognition in education,Chapter17, (753-760). New York, USA: Routledge.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. 52, 1–26.

Bannert, M. & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalization method affect learning?, Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39-58.

Bartolomé, A. (2004). Nuevas Tecnologias en el aula.New Technologies in the classroom Barcelona, España: Grao.

Bendixen L & Hartley K. (2003). Succesful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awarness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 15-30.

Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Self-regulation. An introductory overview. In:M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner. (Eds), Handbook of Self-regulation. Chapter 13 (423-428) San Diego,USA:Academic Press.

Cabero, J. (2003). Replanteando la Tecnología Educativa. Rethinking Educational technology.Comunicar, 21,(23-30). Accessed: 04.02.09.

Desoete A. (2008). Multimethod assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: how you test is what you get. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 189-206.

Dresel, M. & Haugwitz, M. (2008). A computer-based approach to fostering motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 3-20.

Duncan, T. & McKeachie, W. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist ,40, 117-128.

Ericsson, K. & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, USA: MIT press.

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 3, 906-911.

Graesser, A., Wiley, J., Goldman, S., O’Reilly, T., Jeon, M., & McDaniel, B. (2007). SEEK Web tutor: fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption. Metacognition and Learning, 2 ,89-105. Igo, L., Kiewra, K., & Bruning, R. (2008). Individual differences and intervention flaws. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 149-168.

Jöreskog, K., Sörbom, D. & Wallentin, F. (2006). Latent variable scores and observational residuals. Finland. Upssala University. Accessed: 07.05.07

Kinchin, I. & Cabot, L. (2007). Concept mapping principles in power point. European Journal of Dental Education, 11, 194-199.

Kirkup, G. & Kirkwood, A. (2005). Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching – a tale of gradualism rather than a revolution. Learning,Media & Technology, 30(2), 185-199.

Manlove, S., Lazonder, A., & de Jong, T. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 141-155.

Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge,U.K. :Cambridge University Press

Mayer, R. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13,125-139.

Middleton, T. (1992). Applications of virtual reality to learning. Interactive Learning International, 8, 253-257.

Neo, K. & Neo, M. (2001). A constructivist learning experience: Reconstructing a web site using web based multimedia authoring tools. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17, 330-350.

Nevgi, A. (2003). Motivational strategies of students in virtual university. Third international,Inter-disciplinary Evidence-Based Policies and Indicator Systems Conference. July 2001 (pp. 1-17). . Accessed: 05.09.09.

Nevgi, A., Virtanen, P., & Niemi, H. (2006). Supporting students to develop collaborative learning skills in technology based environments. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 37, 937-947.

Oilo, D. (1998). “De lo tradicional a lo virtual: las nuevas tecnologías de la información”. Debate temático. “From traditional to virtual: the new information technologies”. Thematic debate. UNESCO París. Conferencia Mundial Sobre Educación Superior (pp. 1-18) <>. Accessed: 04.03.09.

Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Emory University. . Accessed:19.01.09.

Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration—an extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning ,4, 3–31.

Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 2, 459-470.

Pintrich, P. (2000). A framework for conceptualizing student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In: P. Pintrich & P. Ruhotie (Eds). Conative constructs and self-regulated learning,Chapter II (pp. 31-51). Finland: Research centre for vocational education.

Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement. 53, 801-813.

Plan de estudios FES Acatlán, Diseño Gráfico. FES Acatlán, Graphic Design Curriculum. UNAM, (2009).<>. Accessed: 12.12.08.

Regian, J. & Shebilske, W. (1992). Virtual reality an instructional medium for visualspatial tasks. Journal of Communication, 4, 12-19.

Ruohotie, P. & Nokelainen, P. (2000). Modern modeling of student regulation and self regulated learning. In: P. Pintrich and P. Ruohotie. Conative constructs and selfregulated learning,Chapter VI (pp. 141-142). Finland: Research centre for vocational education.

Sáez, F. (2004). Más allá de internet. La red universal digital. X-economía y nuevo entorno tecno-social. Beyond the Internet. The universal digital network. X-economy and new techno-social environment. Madrid, España: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.

Serra, M. & Metcalfe, J.( 2009) Effective implementation of metacognition. In; D.Hacker, J. Dunlosky and A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education, Chapter 15 (pp. 652-654). New York.USA: Routledge.

Stoney, S. & Oliver, R. (1999). Exploring the nature of self-regulated learning with multimedia.In B. Collins & R. Oliver (Eds.). Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (1),869- 874.Chesapeake: USA.AACE.

Suárez, C. (2004). La zona de desarrollo próximo, categoría pedagógica para el análisis de la interacción en contextos de virtualidad. The zone of proximal development, educational category for the analysis of interaction in virtual settings. Revista Pixel Bit, (24), 5-10. Accessed: 22.06.08.

Tobías,S. & Everson,H.(2009). The importance of knowing what you know: a knowledge monitoring framework for studying metacognition in Education. Effective implementation of metacognition. In; D.Hacker, J. Dunlosky and A. Graesser. (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education, Chapter 7 (pp. 261-263). New York,USA:Routledge.

Van Hout, B. (2000). Assessing active self-directed learning. In P. Simons, J. van der Linden y T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning, (pp. 83-101). Germany: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Veenman, M. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: a discussion. Metacognition and Learning. 2, 177-183.

Veenman, M., Kok, R., & Blöte, A. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills at the onset of metacognitive skills development. Instructional Science, 33,193-211.

Veenman, M., Van Hout, B., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14.

Viniegra, L. & Aguilar, E.(1999). Hacia otra concepción del currículo.Towards another conception of curriculum. Ciudad de México, México: Editorial Instituto Mexicano delSeguro Social.

Virtanen, P., Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., Raehalme, O., & Launonen, A. (2003). Towards strategic learning skills through self-assessment and tutoring in web-based environment. Conference on Educational Research, University of Hamburg, Germany. . Accessed:17.11.08.

Weinstein, C. & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In: M. Wittrock (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching, (pp. 315-327). New York USA; Mac Millan.

Winne, P. & Hadwin, A. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In: D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications, (pp. 297-314). New York. USA: Taylor & Francis.

Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45,(1) 166–183.