Mathematics and Metacognition in Adolescents and Adults with Learning Disabilities


Annemie DESOETE


Abstract

A majority of studies on learning disabilities have focused on elementary grades. Although problems with learning disabilities are life-affecting only a few studies focus on deficits in adults. In this study adults with isolated mathematical disabilities (n=101) and adults with combined mathematical and reading disabilities (n=130) solved tests on procedural calculation and number knowledge, numerical facility and visuospatial skills. Metacognitive skilfulness was assessed through calibration measures, a questionnaire, stimulated recall, and thematic analyses after a qualitative interactive interview with a flexible agenda to discover the interviewee’s own framework of meanings and to avoid imposing the researcher’s structures and assumptions. In our dataset the isolated group (MD) did worse than the comorbid group (M+RD) on mental representation, dealing with contextual information and number knowledge. However the comorbid group did worse on the number sense tasks. No significant differences were found between the MD and M+RD adults for fact retrieval, procedural calculation and visuo spatial tasks. In addition adults with MD overestimated their mathematics results, whereas individuals with M+RD underestimated their results in the calibration task. Moreover, adults with M+RD thought that they were worse on the evaluation of the own results, the evaluation of the own capacities and on monitoring when things went wrong compared with adults in the M+RD group. Thematic analyses revealed that many adults had problems with planning and keeping track of steps and that supporting surroundings were important protective factors towards the chances of success. Consequences for the assessment of metacognition in adults and for the support of adults with mathematical disabilities are discussed.


Keywords

Metacognition, Mathematical Learning Disabilities, Assessment, Comorbidity

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic EU Education Programs
Pages 82 - 100
Issue IEJEE, Volume 2, Issue 1, Special Issue Metacognition
Date of acceptance 01 October 2009
Read (times) 561
Downloaded (times) 222

Author(s) Details

Annemie DESOETE

Ghent University, Arteveldehogeschool, Sig, Belgium, Belgium


References

Barbaresi, W.J., Katusic, S.K., Colligan, R.C., Weaver, A.L., & Jacobsen, S.J. (2005). Learning disorder: Incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976-82, Rochester, Minn, Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5 (5), 281-289.

Beacham, N., & Trott, C. (2005). Screening for dyscalculia within Higher Education. MSOR Connections, 5 (1), 40-43

Beacham, N., & Trott, C. (2006a). Project update. Widening the use of DyscalculiUM: A first-line screening test for dyscalculia in higher education. MSOR Connections, 6 (1), 1-3.

Beacham, N., & Trott, C. (2006b). Project Report: Wider use of DyscalculiUM: An electronic screening tool for dyscalculia in H.E. MSOR Connections, 6 (2), 12-19.

Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A proces-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1-41). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

Clark, L., A., Watson, D., & Reynolds, S. (1995). Diagnosis and classification of psychopathology: challenges to the current system and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 121-153.

Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Cornoldi, C., Venneri, A., Marconato, F., Molin, A., & Montinaro, C. (2003). A rapid screening measure for the identification of visuospatial learning disability in schools. Journal of learning disabilities, 36, 299-306.

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Desoete, A. (2008). Co-morbidity in mathematical learning disabilities: Rule or exception? The Open rehabilitation Journal, 1 (1), 15-26.

Desoete, A. (2007a). Students with mathematical disabilities in Belgium: from definition, classification and assessment to STICORDI devices. (181-222). In T.E. Scruggs & M.A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Vol. 20. International Perspectives Amsterdam & Oxford: Elsevier Press.

Desoete, A. (2007b). Evaluating and improving the mathematics teaching-learning process through metacognition? Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5 (3), 705-730.

Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2006). Cognitieve Deelhandelingen van het Rekenen Jongvolwassenen. CDR 5de graad. VCLB Service cvba

Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 435-449.

Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2004). Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities in Belgium. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (1), 50-61.

Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Huylebroeck, A. (2006). Metacognitive skills in Belgian third grade children (age 8 to 9) with and without mathematical learning disabilities. Metacognition and Learning, 1 ( 2), 119-135.

De Vos, T. (1992). Tempo Test Rekenen (TTR). Nijmegen: Berkhout.

Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic. Implications for psychology, neuroscience and education. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297-323). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

Elshout-Mohr, M., Meijer, J., van Daalen-Kapteijns, M., & Meeus, W. (2003). A self-report inventory for metacognition related to academic tasks. Paper presented at the 10th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Padova, Italy 26-30 August 2003.

Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research. London, Sage.

Frank, A.W. (2004). After methods, the story: from incongruity to truth in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14 (3), 430-440.

Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 564-574

Geary, D.C. (2004). Mathematics and Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (1), 4-13.

Holliday, A. (2002). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage.

Jordan, N., Hanich, L. B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with co-morbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834-850.

Kaplan, B., Crawford, S., Cantell, M., Kooistra, L., & Dewey, D. (2006). Comorbidity, cooccurrence, continuum: what’s in a name? Child: care, health and development, 32, 723-731.

Kibby, M. Y., Marks, W., Morgan, S., & Long, C. J. (2004). Specific impairment in developmental reading disabilities: A working memory approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(4), 349-363.

Light, J.G., & DeFries, J.C. (1995). Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disabilities: Genetic and environmental etiologies. Journal of learning disabilities, 28, 96-106.

Lin, L. M., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345-391.

Martinez, R. (2006). Social support in inclusive middle schools: perceptions of youth with learning disabilities, Psychology in the Schools, 43 (2), 197-209.

Martinez, R. & Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2004). Emotional Adjustment and School Functioning of Young Adolescents with Multiple Versus Single LearningDisabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (5), 411-420.

Neale, M.C., & Kendler, K.S. (1995). Models of Comorbidity for Multifactorial Disorders, American Journal of Human Genetics, 57 (4), 935-953.

Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385-413.

Pressley, M. (2000). Development of grounded theories of complex cognitive processing: Exhaustive within- and between study analyses of thinking-aloud data. In G. Schraw,& J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 262-296). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

Pugalee, D. K. (2001). Writing, mathematics, and metacognition: Looking for connections through students’ work in mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 236-245.

Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (Eds.) (2003). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.

Rhee, S. H., Hewitt, J. K., Corley, R. P., Willcutt, E. G., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Testing Hypotheses Regarding the Causes of Comorbidity: Examining the Underlying Deficits of Comorbid Disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 346-362.

Seale, C., Gogo, G., Gubrium, J.F., & Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.

Shalev, R.S., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 121-125.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). A Triarchic View of Giftedness: Theory and Practice. In N. Coleangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 43-53). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Stock, P., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2006). Focussing on mathematical disabilities: a search for definition, classification and assessment. In Soren V. Randall (Ed.), Learning Disabilities New Research. Nova Science: Hauppage, NY.

Swanson, H.L., Jerman, O., & Zheng, X. (2009). Math disabilities and reading disabilities: Can they be separated? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 175-196.

Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249-274

Swanson, H.L., Jerman, O., & Zheng, X. (2008). Math Disabilities and Reading Disabilities: Can they be Separated? Journal of Psycho-educational assessment, in press.

Swanson, H. L., & Sachse-Lee, C. (2001). Mathematical problem solving and working memory in children with learning disabilities: Both executive and phonological processes are important. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 294–321.

Tesch, R. (1991). Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer Trott, C. & Beacham, N. (2006). DyscalculIUM. UK: Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University.

Van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Executive functioning in children, and its relations with reasoning, reading, and arithmetic. Intelligence, 35, 427-449

Veenman, M.V.J., Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning. Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3-14.

Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learnedfrom multi-method designs? In C. Artelt, & B. Moschner (Eds), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen fur Forschung und Praxis (pp. 77-99). Münster: Waxmann.

Willcutt, E.G., Pennington, B.F., Boada, R., Ogline, J.S., Tunick, R.A., Chhabildas, N.A. et al. (2001). A comparison of the cognitive deficits in reading disability an attentiondeficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110 (1), 157-172.