Understanding an Elementary School Teachers' Journey of Using Technology in the Classroom from Sand Table to Interactive Whiteboard



The aim of this study is to understand an elementary teachers’ experiences about using interactive whiteboard (IWB) in the classroom. Narrative inquiry were adopted to conduct the study. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews with the teacher and analysed through narrative analysis. In the study, two major stories emerged. The first story was about the characteristics and difficulties of being an innovative and transformative teacher. In the second story, the use of technology in the classroom were cited. Second story consisted of such sub-stories as changing student profiles, teaching-learning process, measurement and evaluation process, infrastructural adequacy, stakeholder interaction, facilitator role of the technology and challenges of using IWB in the classroom. In all these stories, the examples and advantages of effective use of IWB in the classroom were explained. We can have the following suggestions from the words of the classroom teacher who has been using various technological tools in his classroom for about 40 years, including 10-year IWB use: Teachers should be open-minded for innovation in the sense of professional development, consider the interests of students, reduce the prejudice about the use of technology, utilize the processes that increase and facilitate the learning.


Narrative research, Classroom teachers, Interactive whiteboard

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic Environmental Education
Pages 1 - 20
Issue IEJEE, Volume 8, Issue 1
Date of acceptance 30 September 2015
Read (times) 1100
Downloaded (times) 660

Author(s) Details


Anadolu University, Turkey


Anadolu University, Turkey,


Ates, M. (2010). Ortaogretim cografya derslerinde akilli tahta kullanimi. Marmara Cografya Dergisi, 22, 409-427.

Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bell, J. S. (2002). Narrative inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 207-213.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cakiroglu, U., Akkan, Y., & Guven, B. (2012). Analysing the effect of web-based instruction applications to school culture within technology integration. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(2), 1023-1048.

Ekici, F. (2008). Akilli tahta kullaniminin ilkogretim ogrencilerinin matematik basarilarina etkisi. Yayinlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi. Marmara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu., Istanbul.

Emeagwali, O. L., & Naghdipour, B. (2013). Exploring the usage and user-perception of interactive White boards in higher education in North Cyprus. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 272-276.

Guler, A., Halicioglu, M. B., & Tasgin, S. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Seckin Yayinlari.

Johnson, K. E. (2007). Tracing teacher and student learning in teacher-authored narratives. Teacher Development, 11(2), 175-188.

Kim, H. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status qua bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567-582.

King, K. P. (2004). Both sides now: Examining transformative learning and Professional development of educators. Innovative Higher Education, 29(2), 155-174.

King, K. P. (2002). Educational technology Professional development as transformative learning opportunities. Computers & Education, 39, 283-297.

Lai, H. (2010). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of interactive whiteboard training workshops: A case study from Taiwan. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 511-522.

LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 146-154.

Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative data analysis: conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20(2), 133-139.

Merriam, S. B. (2004). The role of cognitive development in Mezirow’s transformational learning theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(1), 60-68.

Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.

Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.

Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2012a). FATIH Project. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tr/english.php retrieved from 15 May, 2015.

Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2012b). Meslekiçi eğitim ihtiyacını belirleme anketi genel değerlendirme sonuçları. http://oyegm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_07/26120639_anket_ihtiyac_belirleme2012.pdf retrieved from 16 April 2014.

Pamuk, S., Cakir R., Ergun, M., Yilmaz, H.B. & Ayas, C. (2013). The use of tablet pc and interactive board from the perspectives of teachers and students: Evaluation of the FATIH project. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1799-1822.

Sad, S. N. & Ozhan, U. (2012). Honeymoon with IWBs: A qualitative insight in primary students’ views on instruction with interactive whiteboard. Computers & Education, 59, 1184-1191.

Saltan, F., Arslan, K. & Gok, A. (2010, March). Teachers’ acceptance of interactive white boards: A case study. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2360-2365.

Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.

Tataroglu, B., & Erduran, A. (2010). Examining students’ attitudes and views towards usage on interactive whiteboard in mathematics lessons. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2533-2538.

Turkish Education Association (2009). Ogretmen yeterlikleri. Ankara: Adım Okan Publishing.

Turel, Y. K. (2012). Teachers’ negative attitudes towards interactive white board use: Needs and problems. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 423-439.

Turel, Y. K. (2011). An interactive whiteboard student survey: Development, validity and reliability. Computers & Education, 57, 2441-2450.

Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method. New York: Routledge.

Yang, K., Wang, T., & Kao, Y. (2012). How an interactive whiteboard impacts a traditional classroom. Education As Change, 16(2), 313-332.

Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri (6th Ed). Ankara: Seckin Publishing.

Related Papers