Teacher Variables As Predictors of Academic Achievement of Primary School Pupils Mathematics

Adedeji TELLA


This study examined the relationship between Teacher self- efficacy, interest, attitude, qualification, experience and pupils’ academic achievement in primary school mathematics. The participants of the study comprises of 254 primary school teachers and 120 primary school pupils. Data collected on the study were analysed using a stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results reveals that teacher self –efficacy and interest had significant correlation with pupils achievement scores. Teacher’s self-efficacy being the best predictor of pupils’ academic achievement in mathematics was followed by teacher’s interest. Attitude, qualification and experience were not significant correlation with pupil’s achievement in mathematics. The study recommended that it is high time for primary school mathematics teachers to have a change of attitude towards the teaching of the subject so that the achievement of universal basic education will not be hindered. Furthermore, primary school educational authorities were called upon to ensure that only teachers who are qualified to teach the subject are employed. Not these alone, their attention was also drawn to the fact that they should design educational programmes that will enhance the teacher self- efficacy for a better prediction of pupils’ achievement in mathematics.


Teacher Self-Efficacy, Interest, Attitude, Qualification, Experience and Pupils Academic Achievement in Mathematics.

Paper Details

Paper Details
Topic EU Education Programs
Pages 16 - 33
Issue IEJEE, Volume 1, Issue 1
Date of acceptance 01 October 2008
Read (times) 2059
Downloaded (times) 1074

Author(s) Details

Adedeji TELLA

Osun State University, Nigeria, Nigeria


Adams, P.E. & Krockover, G.H. (1997). Concerns and Perceptions of beginning Secondary Science and Mathematics Teachers. Science Education 81(1), 29 –50.

Agyenmang, D.K. (1993). Sociology of Education for African Students.Temo: Ghana Publishing Corporation.

Akpan, A.A (1987).Correlates of Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability among Secondary School Students. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis University of Ibadan, Ibadan.

Ale, S.O (1989). School Mathematics in the 1990’s some Major Problems for Developing Countries: International Journal of Mathematics Educational in Science and Technology 20 (5), 655-659.

Alele- William G. (1988). Keynote Address Delivered at the Silver Jubilee meeting of mathematics Association of Nigeria (MAN) Sept. 1982. Abacus 18 (1), 15-19.

Aminu, J. (1990). Address by the Honourable Minister of Education. Abacus 20 (1), 22-29.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward Unifying Theory of Behavioural Change. Psychological Review 84, 191 – 215.

Bobbitt, S.A., and McMillen, M.M. (1994). Qualifications of the Public School Teacher Workforce: 1988 and 1991(NCES 95-665). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Brookover W, Beady C, Flood P, Schweitzer J & Wisenbaker J (1979) School social systems and student achievement: schools can make a difference. New York: Bergin.

Caraway, S. D. (1985). Factors influencing competency in mathematics among entering elementary Education majors. Unpublished manuscript, Universityof SouthAlabama. (ERIC Reproduction Service Document No. ED260941).

Carpenter, T., & Lubinski, C. (1990).Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 21, 55-69.

Davies, N., & Savell, J. (2000). "Maths is like a bag of tomatoes": Student attitudes upon entry to an Early Years teaching degree. Paper presented at the Teacher Education Forum of Aotearoa New Zealand Conference, Christchurch.

Edwards A, and Knight P. (1974). Effective Early Years Education. Teaching Young Children. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Fajemidagba, O. (1999). Trends in Mathematics Education in Nigeria: Issues and Problems Abacus 2 (1),, 19-27.

Ferguson, R.F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation 28, 465-498.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Goldhaber, D. D., and Anthony, E. (2004). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? The Urban Institute. Retrieved December12, 2006, from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410958

Goldhaber, D. D., and Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22, 129-45.

Georgewill, J.W. (1980).Causes of poor achievement on WAEC Mathematical Examination in River State. Secondary School Nigeria. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 21 (3), 379-385.

Gibson and Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: Construct Validation. Journal of Educational Psychology 76, 569 – 582.

Glathhorn Fox ; Slick ; Breliner & Biddle; Colton & Spark- Lager ; Costa ; Lampert & Clark; Pultorak ; Porter & Brophy; Dwyer & Villegas in Stroot, S; Keil V; Stedman , P; Lohr, L ; Faust, R; Schinn Cariol –Randall, L; Sullivan, A: Czerniak, G; Kuchcinski, J; Orel N; & Richter, M; (1998). Peer Assistant and Review Guidebook. Columbus; OH: Ohio Department of Education.

Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V., & Laine, R.D (1996).The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361- 396.

Grootenboer, P. J. (2002). Affective development in mathematics: A case of two pre- service primary school teachers. In B. Barton, K. Irwin, M. Prankish, & M. Thomas (Eds.). Mathematics education in the South Pacific: Proceedings of the Twenty- Fifth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 318-325). Sydney: MERGA.

Hanushek, E. (1990).The impact of differential expenditure on school performance. Educational Research 14, (4), 20- 25.

Hawkins, E.F., Stancavage, F.B., & Dossey, J.A. (1998). School policies and practices affecting instruction in mathematics. (NCES 98495). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

Hawk, P. P., Coble, C. R., & Swanson, M. (1985). Certification: It does matter. Journal of Teacher Education 36 (3), 13-15.

Hone; Mechling, Stedmen; & Donnelley; Cunningham & Blacenship; Schoenberger, Gusky, Smylie, Mitgelly et al and Gusky and Passaro in George Wenner. (2001); Science and Mathematics Efficacy Beliefs Held by Practicing and Prospective Teachers; A 5 – years Perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology 10 (2), 181-187. .

Ingersoll, R. (1996). Out-of-Field Teaching and Educational Equality (NCES 96–040). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Ingersoll, R. (1999). The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2): 26–37.

Ingersoll, R. (2000). Rejoinder: Misunderstanding the Problem of Out-of-Field Teaching. Educational Researcher 30 (1), 21–22.

Kennedy (1990) & Raudenbush, Rowan & cheong (1992): Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://deo,murdoch.edu.au/gem/iier/iiers/welch.htm

Kerlinger, F.N. (1985). Foundation of Behavioural Research. Rinehart Holt and Winston.

Mayer, D.P., Mullens, J.E., and Moore, M.T. (2000). Monitoring School Quality: An Indicators Report (NCES 2001-030). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

McDonald T & Siegall M (1992).The effects of technological self-efficacy and job focus on job performance, attitudes, and withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Psychology,126, 465–475.

McMillen, M; Seastrom, K.J; Gruber, R.H.; McGrath, D.J.; &. Cohen, B.A. (2000).Qualification of the public school teacher workforce: Prevalence of outof-field teaching 1987-88-1999-2000. Education Statistics Quarterly. Retrieved December 29, 2006 from http://www.nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol4/4_3/2_2asp

Mitchell, M. (1993).Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 3, 408- 422.

Midgely C, Feldlaufer H & Eccles JS (1989) Change in teacher efficacy and student self-and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology l 81 ( 2), pp 247–258.

Monk, D. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review,13(2);125-145.

National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (1996). What Matters Most: Teaching for America's Future. Report of the National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. Summary Report. New York: Author.

Neuschatz, M., and McFarling, M. (1999). Maintaining Momentum: High School Physics for a New Millennium. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. Retrieved December 29, 2006, from http//: www.aip.org/statistics

Robinson, V. (1985). Making Do in the Classroom: A Report on the Misassignment of Teachers. Washington, DC: The Council for Basic Education.

Nisbet, S. (1991). A new instrument to measure pre-service primary teachers’ attitudes to teaching mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3, 34-56.

Odogwu, H.N (1994) Primary school Teachers and the Teaching of Time Concept in Schools” Education Today 7, (21), 24-30.

Ohuche, R.O (1978). Recent attempts at Mathematics Curriculum Renewal in English Speaking West Africa” Abacus 12, (1), 17-26.

Oshibodu, B.M (1984). An Investigation of Teacher’s Instrumental problems in Mathematics. Benin Journal of Educational Studies. 11(3), 43-54.

Oshibodu, B.M. (1988). Mathematics at Primary level’. Abacus 18, (1) 13 – 20.

Rech, J., Hartzell, J, & Stephens, L. (1993). Comparisons of mathematical competencies and attitudes of elementary education majors with established norms of a general college population. School Science and Mathematics,93(3), 141-44.

Relich, J., Way, J., & Martin, A. (1994) Attitudes to teaching mathematics: Further development of a measurement instrument. Mathematics EducationResearch Journal, 6 (1), 56-69.

Riggs, I. and Knochs, L. (1990).Towards the Development of an Elementary Efficacy Belief Instrument. Science Education, 74, 625 – 637. Retrieved December 29, 2006, from http://deo,murdoch.edu.au/gem/iier/iiers/welch.htm

Sanders, W. L. and J. C. Rivers (1996).Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.

Skott, J. (2001). Emerging Practices of a Novice Teacher. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, (1), 3-28.

Southwell, B., & White, A.L.(2005).Attitude versus achievement in pre-service Mathematics teacherEducation.Retrieved December 29, 2006, from: http://www.aare.edu.au/05papsou05705.pdf

Sullivan, P. (1989). The impact of a pre-service mathematics education on beginning primary teachers. Research in Mathematics Education in Australia, August, 1-9.

Swarzer, R., Schmitz, G.S. &. Daytner, G.T. (1999).The teacher self-efficacy scale. Retrieved December 29, 2006, from http://www.fuberlin.de/gessund/skalen/t_se.htm

Tella, A.(1998). An Investigation into Poor Performance and Attitude of Secondary School Students towards Mathematics in Oyo State, Nigeria. Unpublished B.Ed. Project University of Ibadan, Ibadan.

Trentham L, Silvern S & Brogdon R (1985) Teacher efficacy and teacher competency ratings. Psychology in the Schools, 22, (3), 343–349.

Wenglinsky, H. (2000). Teaching the teachers: Different settings, different results. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Wright, S. P., S. P. Horn, et al. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education:11, 57-67